low cost 20mg cialis costco travel packages suhagra 100mg reviews salbutamol guaifenesin mechanism of action ambien online prescription reglan breastfeeding medication buy tadalis sx diclofenac sodium nuvigil vs adderall for narcolepsyobestat buy celexa with no prescription levitra dosage recommendations trental medication use zolpidem tartrate 5 mg side effects medazole 500px kamagra oral jelly kako koristiti arcoxia 90mg pain killer cialis purchase by mastercard vistaril for sleep disordervitamin canesoral duomo zinoxime 75052 paxil cr dosage information buy cialis hong kong relafen 500 mg medica buy cialis online using pay pal cuckold synonyms brand cialis by lilly indomethacin no prescription buy nitrostat without a prescription pharmacy tech certification study guide part d covering cialis for prostrate alli cheap norlevo pill side effect isotretinoin for sale how long for cialis to kick in uroxatral vs flomax discussion groups in the classroom insulin glargine side effects laxifen tablets for kids nolvadex in mexico la vpz de maroa padre help ropinirole 0.25 mg is use for what keppra side effects medication buy nizagara pfizer vgr 100 effects tadalafil 20mg india binozyt antibiotic can you get high off indomethacin 50 mg diazepam side effects in children buspirone buspar vs xanax cialis uputstvo orderpharma topix medrol dosepak side effects stilnox drug side effects garrigue pronunciation of acai buspirone reviews 2013 store gucci new york how to get viagra prescription online buy baclofen overnight artane 2 mg equivalent cytotec medicine pregnancy where to buy elocon cialis no presciptiononline order lipitor without prescription cheapest price on cialis how much does doxycycline cost prostata inflamada sangrando sureway construction edmonton alberta minocycline hydrochloride capsules for dogs plavix 75 mg generic name lamotrigine 25mg tablets vardenafil 20 mg vs levitra cenveo stock dutasteride without prescription antibiotics for sale online from canada over counter levothyroxine dilantin medication side effects farmacias online sin receta anastrozole 1 mg bodybuilding pravachol medication side effects list of indian brand stanozolol tablets biaxin antibiotic erexin maximum male strength black meclizine 12.5 mg cheap 1 pill of cefixime 400 mg aciclovir 800 mg no script condyline 5 minoxidil metotrexate online no rx toprol xl 50 mg side effects neurocet reviews on garcinia how to buy cialis from canada bactroban nasal ointment otc cialis price in india azithromycin over the counter usa ospamox amoxicillin sandoz viagra pure europe pharmaceuticals no prescription buy brand viagra online the price of naltrexone in sa lisinopril hctz 10 12.5 betnovate cream medicine doctor robaxin canada phenegren no prescription buy diclofenac tablets online lopid side effects gemfibrozil 600 street value of seroquel 300 viagra in malta levitra sales in usa fast valtrex delivery buy kamagra paypal noprescriptionneeded 5mg cialis buy sertraline no prescription order escitalopram online ativan lorazepam half life levitra pills confidex silverline xenical vs lesofat purchase alli online ketorolaco dosis pediatrica can i get bentyl without a prescription over the counter flagyl tablets online apotheke a¶sterreich viagra toprol xl generic name 1224 canadien pharmacy vipro celebrex dosage dose
Home MLB Network / Extra Innings Questions of Exclusivity Surround DirecTV Deal

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 620 guests online

Atom RSS

Questions of Exclusivity Surround DirecTV Deal Print
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Friday, 23 February 2007 13:31

Extra InningsAfter traveling to Indianapolis for the Sports Management Worldwide Conference today, The Biz of Baseball is back on track with the following news...

The news of a pending announcement of MLB coming to an agreement with DirecTV to show Extra Innings exclusively was supposed to be announced today. Then word arrived late yesterday that the FCC has shown a keen interest in whether customers will have access to the MLB package for out-of-market games.

Friday, Richard Sandomir of the NY Times shed some more light on the deal, and why it had yet to be announced. As touched on yesterday, there is word that MLB may be willing to relax the window of exclusivity on DirecTV, from 7 years to 3 years, to coincide with the launch of MLB's proposed 24-hour baseball-only channel. That may not be the case, or at least at the time of inking the deal. As reported on the NY Times:

Letting the exclusivity lapse after the 2009 season might have eased a bit of the outrage. And, potentially, it might have softened the guaranteed fulminations on Capitol Hill when baseball and DirecTV officials testify sometime soon before the Senate Commerce Committee.

But according to executives familiar with the agreement who were not authorized to speak about it, the exclusivity will not be relaxed, at least not when the deal is announced. If it is eventually eased, DirecTV would surely reduce its payments; a savvy strategy if it believes it has converted a significant number of new customers and reached a ceiling of Extra Innings buyers.

As to how cable and InDemand, the service that provides Extra Innings on cable, and EchoStar, DishNetwork's parent company are reacting, Sandomir further reports:

EchoStar, Dish’s parent, issued a tart statement Wednesday that railed against exclusive sports deals and called the proposed DirecTV-M.L.B. agreement a “dangerous step backward to an anti-competitive world.”

Three EchoStar publicists declined comment on whether Dish sought its own exclusive deal. A DirecTV spokesman said: “We view this as sour grapes coming from EchoStar and ironic considering that it too had opportunities and negotiations to secure the optimal deal for its own business interests.”

As mentioned within the article, the deal must be approved by the owners before fully implementing the deal. Many markets will be in a lurch due to agreements with cable operators such as Time Warner and Comcast. The Mets, White Sox, Padres and Phillies are cited as examples as clubs that would be impacted by the agreement.

As noted, MLB should have been able to ink this deal some time ago. Whether the FCC's sudden interest is part of the equation, or ownership discontent has any bearing on why the deal was not announced today, none of the principles in the deal would speak on record.

 

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?