nexium 10 mg bijwerkingen cialis 20 mg toronto valtrex 500 mg cena obsidian 25 mg propranolol prospecto cialis 20 mg cialis tadalafil 100mg generic lexapro fda augmentin 875 mg price tapering 10 mg prednisone generic metformin hcl dapoxetine online kaufen cost viagra online doxycycline 100mg hk lexapro 10mg pregnancy generic viagra phillipines nolvadex online order propranolol 40 mg laproff viagra 100mg color generic viagra teva buy viagra sg wellbutrin 900 mg diflucan 50 mg precio buy cipro xr 500 pret viagra 25 mg buy viagra 10 pills kamagra viagra cheap cialis dapoxetine buy viagra price 25 mg zoloft 50 mg efectos prednisone 10 mg glipizide metformin 5 500mg erythromycin gel online buy nolvadex gynecomastia online viagra paypall propecia generic 1mg cheap quality viagra the buy levitra viagra 50 mg ra cialis mg 40 buy generic lasix tadalafil 5 mg cialis costo levitra 10 mg lexapro 10mg forum buy 150mg clomid cipro iv 400 mg discount cialis online priligy online kaufen zoloft 25 mg forum cheap cialis fast zithromax 200 mg 5ml 60 mg of strattera cheap asian viagra cialis india 5mg posologie levitra 20mg reviews generic viagra clomid on 100mg celebrex 200 mg pret valtrex order acyclovir cytotec 100 mg nexium caps 20mg levitra 10mg vidal nebenwirkungen kamagra 100mg valtrex epocrates online online cialis canadian nhs viagra online cialis 30 mg propecia 1 mg price celebrex capsule 200 mg generico al cialis levitra 20 mgs online generic strattera 150 mg doxycycline cialis 4mg viagra dosage 50 mg cialis 5mg cheap viagra 100 mg wikipedia 35 mg cialis silka generic viagra generic viagra comparisons istanbulbuy viagra hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg dose amoxil 500 mg pregnancy 1 mg of prednisone buy propranolol anxiety viagra original online 40 mg lexapro 5 mg. generic cialis synthroid 0.088 mg daily augmentin 625mg tablets cialis 5mg 36 hours cialis 2.5mg cheaper propranolol 40 mg used lexapro generic price prednisone china cheap cipro xl 500 buy cipro forms online viagra online ny cipro 750 mg anatomia generic xenical australia augmentin antibiotico 125 mg viagra 50 mg etkisi ferrari viagra 150mg generic drugs synthroid lexapro generic launch remedio generico xenical generic viagra articles buspar borderline zovirax iv 250mg 1000 mg prednisone iv cialis 20 mg interactions buy cialis tube lisinopril 20 mg pret purchase viagra 50 mg cialis 5mg treatment augmentin 825 mg prospect 40 mg lexapro dosage xenical generic version cialis 5 mg opinion dosaggio viagra 25 mg cheapest pfizer viagra generics biz viagra nexium coupon 20 mg viagra cheap fedex metformin 500 mg adalah zithromax 500 mg tab generic viagra wien kamagra 100mg nederland viagra buy can online viagra experment cialis 100 mg 10 tablett lasix generic drug cialis 100mg buy cialis took 40 mg viagra buy ebay lisinopril 20 mg w941 cialis 100mg cheapest rxusa viagra generic buy levitra overnight generic strattera 60 mg cialis generic about priligy ftbl 60 mg gen kamagra 150 mg 20 mg scimex nolvadex cheap viagra equivalent lisinopril generic appearance lisinopril generic rash 100 mg cialis tadalafil propecia generic costco viagra sale online nexium astrazeneca 40 mg strattera 25 mg reviews zovirax 400mg dosage diflucan 150mg kaina propranolol anxiety 40 mg zithromax buy india viagra buy bangalore buy propecia dht xenical online review viagra rak 25 mg cialis 20 mg confezione generic lexapro ambien cheap viagra discount doxycycline acne generic levitra marke 20mg gettableonline cialis levitra dose 5 mg 150 to 300 mg wellbutrin cialis de 5mgs 10 mg lisinopril order lexapro com bactrim generic version viagra generico farmacia erythromycin 250 mg bp cheappfizer viagra 100gm tablett viagra 100mg online physician viagra mg xenical tijuana generic viagra cortancyl 20mg prednisone cialis 10 mgr cytotec pharmacy online doxycycline vet buy 200mg celebrex lasix 40 mg posologie levitra 60mg cipro 250 mg uti synthroid 75mg generic cipro 600mg buy aventis clomid cialis ordering online bula propranolol 40mg viagra 500 mg price wellbutrin sr cheapest cheapest kamagra jellies cialis generic daily 2.5 prednisone 50 mg infection generic cialis dubai glucophage generic metformin buying viagra cvs wellbutrin generic image generic viagra cheap buy doxycycline 50 mg 20 mg lexapro lexapro 5mg 5ml 40mg of lasix where viagra buy augmentin 500mg alcohol nexium 40 mg pdf buy chewable kamagra viagra e generici buy viagra where prednisone pack 5 mg 1 mg valtrex zithromax 500 mg anwendung xenical 120mg costs celebrex 30mg viagra buy brisbane cialis 100mg order cialis 5mgs prednisone 20mg cancer xenical buy australia zithromax 250mg tabs prednisone 5 mg 12 day propranolol 40 mg reviews nexium granulado 2.5 mg prednisone 5mg info lisinopril pill mg synthroid 125 mg color 100mg fake cialis doxycycline 20 mg buy zithromax lyme 500 mg xr metformin 500 mg buy walmart viagra nexium 40mg indonesia 500 mg viagra kamagra manchester buy buy clomid dallas augmentin 500mg uti prednisone 11mg le cialis 20mg online vouchers viagra metformin 750 mg xr online viagra lloyds buy periactin cheap levitra 40mg 1000 mg valtrex zithromax pfizer 500mg clomid mg dosage cialis directions 20 mg buy cialis denmark order viagra medication nexium cap40mg cialis 20 oder 10 mg mg of zithromax propranolol 10 mg dawkowanie buy viagra real doxycycline generic tablets lisinopril 30 mg 3762 cialis preis 5 mg recensioni cialis 20 mg lexapro 15 mg prijs viagra 50 mg 2 tablet penjual clomid online doxycycline 100mg nl buy american viagra harga viagra 10mg xenical 120 mg fiyat purchase periactin online clomid 100mg daily cipro 400 mg iv lasix 12.5 mg cost cialis cheap usa buy hcg nolvadex cipro 750mg viagra online discrete nexium 40 mg buy cheap pills cialis generic viagra company diflucan 150mg 1s viagra pfizer cheap generic lexapro 2012 name generic propecia finasteride buspirone generic wellbutrin red viagra 600mg generic viagra 600mg doxycycline 50 mg rosacea clomid generic multiples 2013 augmentin bid 1000 mg 14 viagra online wiki 150mg viagra dose buy pet doxycycline cipro 500 mg pill farmaco celebrex 200 mg safest online cialis buy wholesale kamagra buy generic propecia generic brand zithromax erythromycin ophthalmic generic celebrex 200 mg alkohol propecia buy canada propecia generic walgreens efficacite cialis 20mg viagra 100mg pills kamagra 150 mg dosage lexapro generic turkce generic levitra work generic indian cialis viagra online caution buy levitra dosage prednisone 10 mg allergies lexapro generic lawsuits cheaps cialis viagra gel cheapest nexium 40mg bula viagra comprar generico cialis 5 mg ervaringen lexapro 1omg generic buspar cost buy propecia forum buying viagra goa purchase prednisone online lexapro 20mg generic buy doxycycline 40mg cialis paypal generic prednisone ten mg take 2 cialis 20mg. clomid online success lexapro 10mg paxil comprare levitra online synthroid 50 mg price generic antidepressant lexapro cialis 5 mg cheapest buying clomid 150 mg nexium 10 mg kaina buy n viagra generic bactrim ingredients augmentin amoxicilina 875 mg buy kamagra australia cipro hcl 250 mg doxycycline 50 mg image cytotec purchase online cialis 5 mg preisvergleich bestil viagra online cialis generica contrareembolso bactrim f generico 300 mg of viagra preise levitra 20mg celebrex order online online viagra safety taking150mg viagra wellbutrin generic cheap lisinopril 10mg. substitutes viagra 50mg information soft cialis generic sanafil 20 mg cialis generic cialis prices levitra 2.5 mg feedback purchase cialis 10mg buy zovirax cvs strattera 25 mg viagra doctors online online viagra tesco cialis and andromgel malaysia buying cialis levitra europe online buy liquid lasix bula viagra generico hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg dosage buy propecia generic prednisone 20 mg canine viagra generic leagle zovirax 400 mg bula propecia 5mg took 2 20 mg levitra lisinopril 5 mg info 12.5 mg zoloft effective 10mg propranolol anxiety generic cialis in generic cialis 3 days obat valtrex 500 mg buy xenical uae buy zoloft without day 17 zoloft 25 mgs vegetal viagra 200 mg zoloft tablets 50mg metformin 500 mg 48 93 5 mg propecia priligy 30 mg brand generika xenical 120 mg viagra online pharmacy cipro buy online buy zithromax 4rx purchase bactrim online lisinopril 40 mg cheap cialis split 20mg nexium 10 mg forum ordering lexapro online levitra 15mg cialis 5mg comprar doxycycline 100mg cialis 10 mg effects indian generic viagra lisinopril 2.5 mg medication mail order viagra 150 take cialis 20mg cheap overnight cialis medicamento levitra 10 mg zoloft 75 mg dosage lexapro mood disorder viagra price online 500mg of cipro buy kamagra ireland 50mg viagra tablets purchase erythromycin online order for viagra 5 mg cialis australia order xenical uk cialis sordera dinamarca online lexapro online viagra now cialis cheap melbourne buy nexium 14 tablets vietnam buy viagra order propecia us levitra 10 mg online day 17 zoloft 100mg 20 mg lexapro pregnancy cialis 5 mg cheap purchase cytotec online comprar lexapro 15 mg cipro 500 mg endikasyonu nebenwirkung metformin 850 mg canadian 5 mg cialis prednisone 10 mg cost cialis 2.5 mg canada 1000 mg amoxil prednisone 50 mg used buy erythromycin antibiotics cialis 2.5 mg greece cipro 250 mg price nexium 40mg brasil cheap viagra aust cap augmentin 625mg synthroid generic substitution garlic 1000 mg doxycycline levitra 20mg online cheap cialis drugs Levitra 10 mg Buy viagra online paris viagra da 100 mg buy nolvadex dropper cipro 1000 mg uti cheap tetracycline online prednisone tabs 20mg viagra powder order viagra buy contest viagra 100mg dosage viagra 100mg bericht viagra buyer usa cipro xr 750 mg viagra cheap review propranolol hydrochloride 10 mg cialis online uk periactin 2mg 5ml lisinopril mg dosage zithromax 500 mg mims quick kamagra online generic zoloft breastfeeding viagra freeonline.com cialis pills buyer zoloft generic names doxycycline 100mg tabs buy doxycycline 100mg google xenical 120mg buy viagra kolkata periactin 4mg tablets propranolol movement disorders cheap viagra seoul generico viagra comprar levitra online malaysia generic wellbutrin pulled cheap 10 viagra hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg prices wirkung cialis 10mg hydrochlorothiazide purchase online diflucan 150 mg dosaggio 100mg viagra etkileri generic levitra quality international viagra online viagra buying canada fungsi erythromycin 400mg synthroid buy cheap viagra fedex generic viagra spain is zoloft generic 100mg clomid iui 8000 mg viagra zoloft lek 100 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg generic
Home Maury Brown The History of MLB Antitrust Exemption and San Jose’s Effort to Land the A’s

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 373 guests online

Atom RSS

The History of MLB Antitrust Exemption and San Jose’s Effort to Land the A’s PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 91
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Thursday, 20 June 2013 13:46

Oakland A'sOn Tuesday, the City of San Jose filed an antitrust lawsuit charging Major League Baseball has thwarted efforts to allow the Oakland Athletics to relocate there. The Giants currently have the rights to Santa Clara Co. and have said that they are not willing to relinquish it, even though former A’s owner Walter Haas gave it to the Giants in 1990 to allow the Giants to potentially move to the Santa Clara area. After the Giants saw not one, but two referendums fail that would have allowed the Giants to relocate to San Jose, a last ditch-effort resulted in what is now AT&T Park. The problem was, the territory was reaffirmed as the Giants’ even though they no longer were looking to move to the territory that Haas had relinquished.

The lawsuit at hand (you can read it here) is the latest attempt to overturn MLB antitrust exemption. Although the NFL sees limited antitrust exemption for television, baseball is the only N. American sports league to still see such sweeping antitrust privileges.

In 1922, the Supreme Court first considered the application of federal antitrust law to professional sports in Federal Baseball Clubs, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs (read here). In the opinion delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, he said that baseball was not interstate commerce, and therefore not subject to the Sherman Act:

The business is giving exhibitions of base ball, which are purely state affairs. It is true that in order to attain for these exhibitions the great popularity that they have achieved competitions must be arranged between clubs from different cities and States. But the fact that in order to give the exhibitions the Leagues must induce free persons to cross state lines and must arrange and pay for their doing so is not enough to change the character of the business.

Since then, there have been other antitrust cases surrounding relocation. Most notably, Al Davis sued the NFL in 1982 saying that they were blocking his efforts to move to the Raiders from Oakland to Los Angeles. Indeed, the court ruled in his favor. On the other hand, the court did not rule in favor of the Clippers in the ‘80s when they looked to move from San Diego to Los Angeles (see NBA v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc.). In that case, the Ninth Circuit held that sports league created restrictions on franchise movement do not constitute per se violations of antitrust law. In other words, each case must be individually evaluated against the Sherman Act which seeks to prevent monopolies in business.

Since then, the court has been leery of weighing in on league powers over relocation. Most recently a US Bankruptcy judge refused to address relocation as part of an attempt by former Blackberry co-CEO Jim Balsillie to purchase the Phoenix Coyotes and relocate them to Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. In his decision, Judge Redfield T. Baum wrote, "In hockey parlance, the court is passing the puck to the NHL who can decide to take another shot at the sale net or it can pass off the puck."

Back to the San Jose lawsuit, there are some problems that if allowed to fully move forward do not bode well for the city. For one, this isn’t a case where ownership of the A’s is filing the suit, such as the case was with Al Davis and the Raiders. Davis argued he was being monetarily damaged for the NFL’s efforts to block him. The City of San Jose is ostensibly trying to make the argument that the A’s would make (the complaint seeks action for violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Tortious Interference with Contractual Advantage, and Tortious Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage, and for violation of the federal Sherman Act, and violation of California’s Cartwright Act, adding, “Plaintiffs have suffered and continue to suffer damages and antitrust injury in the millions of dollars due to Defendants’ unreasonable restraint of trade.”), but it’s difficult to say that the city is being damaged to a level of extent that might allow antitrust exemption for baseball to be overturned.

But, the question is, does San Jose need this case to run the distance?

The fact that the last real challenge to baseball’s antitrust exemption was in 1972 in Flood v Kuhn (read here) in which Curt Flood sought to break the reserve clause and allow for free agency says that baseball has been able to dodge the matter. But, recently, not only has San Jose been involved in going after MLB’s antitrust exemption, but they are named in a class-action suit by fans over league broadcast blackout policies. Is San Jose simply doing this as a test case to see if they can garner the same result?

Major League Baseball’s Executive Vice President for Economics & League Affairs Rob Manfred issued a statement in response to the lawsuit filed by the City of San Jose and was quick to defend the league’s position.

“In considering the issues related to the Oakland Athletics, Major League Baseball has acted in the best interests of our fans, our communities and the league,” said Manfred. “The lawsuit is an unfounded attack on the fundamental structures of a professional sports league. It is regrettable that the city has resorted to litigation that has no basis in law or in fact.”

If MLB were concerned enough to prevent the antitrust case to go the distance, it could act as a forcing function to achieve the move by the A’s. First off, the league constitution (read here) would need to be amended. While the complaint against MLB claims that the A’s and Giants are currently the only single market in which territory is not shared, the fact is, the league has always seen Oakland and San Francisco as two distinct markets. In that, the Giants physical territory would need to be amended to move Santa Clara Co. back to the A’s as it currently reads as follows:

City of San Francisco; and San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Monterey and Marin Counties in California; provided, however, that with respect to all Major League Clubs, Santa Clara County in California

To do this would require 75 percent approval by the league’s owners. On top of that, 75 percent of the owners would have to vote in favor of allowing the A’s to move to San Jose. It is safe to say that if one aspect was voted in favor, so would the other.

In the midst of all of this are the Giants who will be continuing to fight the matter tooth and nail. In order to have Selig, the league and the owners push the relocation  through it will require indemnifying the Giants. To what extent and how that would happen is a question difficult to answer. While the league got the last relocation through in 2005 with the Expos relocating to Washington, DC against the Orioles’ will, that was done with the creation of a regional sports network when MASN was created. At the time, the league agreed to the following:

  • A guarantee that will keep Baltimore’s annual revenues no lower than $130 million. If they do drop below that threshold, MLB will make up the difference;
  • A minimum franchise value for the Orioles at around $360 million; and
  • A 90 percent equity in MASN to the Orioles while the Nationals initially received only 10 percent. That increases for the Nationals over the life of the 23-year agreement to 33 percent.

The problem is  the Giants already own 30 percent of CSN Bay Area, and the A’s are on CSN California. Both clubs would need to be able to back out of their agreements and allow for the creation of a new RSN, something that would flood the market with another RSN.

The other option would be for some form of revenue-sharing from the A’s to the Giants. This would seem to run counter to one of the core issues at hand which is relocation to San Jose is designed to increase revenues from the state that they are now in Oakland. The A’s could move to San Jose, but still be at a revenue disadvantage.

None of this is easy, even if the league were to finally stand up and say that they need to allow for the A’s to relocate. From the beginning the issue has been one of self-preservation by the league and its clubs. After all, if San Jose were able to force MLB’s hand, then it would set a precedent for other clubs in the league to relocate. The Tampa Bay Rays are still trying to figure out how to get out of Tropicana Field. If the A’s went to San Jose, could that open up the possibility of Northern New Jersey pressing to get the Rays there against the will of the Yankees and Mets?

All we know is this… there will be many months for this to play out. The league may try to get the case dismissed, but that doesn’t seem likely. San Jose may prevail in getting the case heard, but chances of them winning seem long. And finally, while it’s likely a long shot, the league could lose antitrust exemption—a most coveted and fought after advantage for the league—at the risk of trying to fight the case. There will be many months to see if this is a game of chicken or not.


Maury BrownMaury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He writes for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted here.

Follow Maury Brown on Twitter Twitter

Follow The Biz of Baseball on TwitterTwitter

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?