Home Maury Brown Jim Crane’s No-Win Situation with the Astros

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 532 guests online

Atom RSS

Jim Crane’s No-Win Situation with the Astros PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Monday, 14 November 2011 12:26

Jim CraneGiven what I’ve published prior, you might be saying, “Huh?” but I feel for Jim Crane. The man about to take over the Houston Astros may wind up with the shortest honeymoon period of any new owner in recent memory.

Crane is in a no-win situation. After several attempts to land an MLB club, barring some last minute snafu, Crane will finally do so on Thurs. when MLB’s owners vote to approve the $680 million sale from Drayton McLane.

The bad thing for Crane is, the sale has the added wrinkle of moving the Astros to the AL West as early as the 2013 season in the mix. Fans, incensed at the notion of the 50-year relationship with the National League is about to bid farewell have already begun booing Crane for “bowing to Selig” over the move.

To be blunt, that’s unfair.

Look, the Astros move to the AL is something bigger than Jim Crane. Truth me told, it’s something that not only the owners want to see, but so do the players as it balances the schedule out.

Never mind that we’ll get interleague daily, the Astros would be moving to the AL whether Jim Crane, Drayton McLane, or some mystery owner behind door #2 was in the ownership position. In that, Crane can’t win. He knows that if he wants the club, he has to make the move. The only question needing to be answered is how much his investor group would be compensated.

And look, at $680 million, Drayton McLane was probably right when he said there wasn’t going to be a better deal out there.

The bad thing is, while $680 million is good for McLane and MLB (even if there’s a $50 million compensation element for the move to the AL, it will be the highest sale price, ever), it may be bad for the Astros.

Crane has already been involved in furthering the “house cleaning” having approved of the Hunter Pence and Michael Bourn deals. That netted eight prospects, but the Astros might not be done, yet. It’s been rumored that Wandy Rodriguez could be next.

In other words, the Astros could be in the same position that they were in 2011 – dead last. The move the AL will cause a major shift in how Ed Wade (or whoever is the next GM, should Crane clean house on the baseball ops side, as expected) goes after building the team for 2013 and beyond.

So, give Crane some slack. He’s entering a situation that no other owner has had to deal with. Don’t cry that he “sold out” to land the Astros. Remember, the Astros were going to go the AL regardless. Give Crane some rope with extra slack. Next year at this time is when you really need to take stock in the direction that the Astros are headed. This season should be written off as “priming the pump.”


Maury BrownMaury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey, and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).

Follow Maury Brown on Twitter Twitter

Follow The Biz of Baseball on TwitterTwitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

Comments (11)Add Comment
0
Crane Photo
written by Chris A., November 14, 2011
Is that really the only photo of Crane that you have? We've been subjected to this one shot for weeks and it doesn't make him look very trustworthy. I wouldn't want my team sold to a guy who couldn't stop and look into a camera and smile.
0
Astros move to the AL
written by WorldWideDon, November 14, 2011
You say this move was a forgone conclusion having nothing to do with the sale. I hadn't read anything that su*gested the league would have forced the move on McLane were he retaining the team.

It was my impression that the sale is the condition precedent to make the move possible: They could make the sale conditioned on the move.

So, if it were San Diego or Phoenix, selling, it would be them moving to the AL and then moving the Astros to the NL West.

As an outside observer, the biggest problem with this move isn't so much the league, but the time zone. Houston is on Central Time. Being in a Western division means nearly all their home games will be starting at 9:15 PM local time. That can't help the value of the TV deal.
0
Ridiculous
written by A.F., November 14, 2011
Maury is probably right that Jim Crane faced a no-win situation here, but he's dead wrong when he keeps saying that the Astros would have been changing leagues regardless. MLB couldn't have forced Drayton McLane to change leagues, and if some other buyer without skeletons offered the same $680 million, MLB would have had no choice but to vote and approve.

It's been obvious for months that MLB was using Crane's skeletons against him to get him to agree to switch leagues. Everyone else had this figured out about 4 months ago.
0
Um....
written by MauryB, November 14, 2011
If "using Crane's skeletons" to get him to jump leagues, then why is not now being reported that Crane will likely see an $80 million compensation due to the league jump? If, as you say, MLB was going to use "skeletons" to their full potential, then MLB didn't do a very good job.

See one: McCourt, Frank. That, in concert with other factors, caused some owners (and Selig) to not have a comfort level with Crane in August. The league jump was not what delayed the vote. That issue came to the forefront later.
0
No way ...
written by A.F., November 14, 2011
"That issue came to the forefront later?" In the eternal words of John McEnroe, "You cannot be serious."

If you really think this realignment idea just popped up in August, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona I'd like to sell you. MLB never cared about Crane's character or else MLB never would have allowed Drayton McLane to waste time negotiating with him. Crane was the perfect buyer for this situation: he's a guy with some skeletons, a guy on whom MLB could exert pressure and get something (realignment) it couldn't get from any other owner.

It's been obvious for two months that MLB was feeding the "character" story to you and Richard Justice to advance their own agenda. What does MLB know about Crane's character now that it didn't know in August? Nothing. The only thing that changed was Crane's position on moving to the A.L.
0
...
written by MauryB, November 14, 2011
If that's the story you've concocted, feel free to believe it. It's not true, but you seem to have put 2 and 2 together and gotten 5, so you keep on keepin'.
0
Come on ...
written by A.F., November 14, 2011
What exactly is your theory here? Are you seriously claiming that if MLB "got comfortable" with Crane back in June or July, that MLB would have approved him and there would have been no realignment in this CBA? You seriously think this whole realignment issue suddenly popped into Bud Selig's mind two days before the Cooperstown owners meetings? Please. It's ridiculous. Not even Richard Justice is peddling this claptrap anymore.
0
...
written by MauryB, November 14, 2011
I'm not claiming anything. I'm not terribly big on doing guessing games. I tend to talk to sources (more than one, on both sides of the ledger on this matter), and work from that. Anything else is just conjecture.
0
...
written by A.F., November 14, 2011
A lot of reporters and the people on the Crane side had been saying for two or three months that the delay was all about realignment, and you shot that talk down at every opportunity, often quite sarcastically. Nothing about Jim Crane's character has changed since July or August. Either he was approvable then or he wasn't. The only thing that has changed is Crane's willingness to switch leagues.
0
M Brown is a total fool
written by BS Detector, November 15, 2011
You continue to maintain this stupid stuff. You have been a mouthpiece for MLB this whole time. I told you months ago that the character stuff was a charade. Instead of apologizing, like a decent human would do, you still maintian your stupid story. "I talk to sources." Give, me a break, it is more accurately stated "I am misled by sources." You are more clueless than Justice, as he at least knows he is a joke.
0
Well Said
written by RobertB, November 16, 2011
Nice article Maury...didnt expect something like this out of you! I've had trouble for a while with the venom being spewed at Jim Crane on this. I think it's pretty sad that MLB decided to make him the fall guy on a deal that they forced. I am disappointed at Selig for having the short-sightedness to willfully begin his ownership this way. I'm pretty confident in his group and their ability to turn this franchise around and I will flat out guarantee the first playoff game at MMP will be a sellout. Division doesnt dictate ticket sales, wins do.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?
 

404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /components/com_bmtj/local/tent.php was not found on this server.


Apache/2.2.16 (Ubuntu) Server at www.alentejo.pt Port 80