Home Maury Brown Jim Crane Will Be Approved to Purchase Astros. Here’s Why

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 405 guests online
Jim Crane Will Be Approved to Purchase Astros. Here’s Why PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:38
Jim Crane
Unless there's a dramtic change, Jim
Crane will be the next owner of the
Houston Astros

The Houston Astros will be getting a new owner in Jim Crane. No, it’s not been made official. No, the vote hasn’t yet occurred, and as with anything in MLB, it could change at the last minute. But, over the last two weeks, matters have moved, and with it, expect Crane’s approval.

If you’re asking, “What changed?” you might as well be asking how an owner thinks; it’s not one thing.

But, here’s what did happened that delayed the initial vote.

It was not the first story on Crane, but something in the report on him in June of this year on Forbes, coupled with the mess that is the current state of the Dodgers under Frank McCourt, got some of the owners rethinking approving him without more information. It wasn’t just an EEOC investigation into discrimination charges against one of Crane’s companies. It’s possible it was the war-profiteering that occurred after that, in conjunction with other matters.

Repeatedly we’ve been told, it wasn’t one thing with Crane. It was slowing up and asking for more information on his dealings. It was getting a “comfort level” with approving Crane.

There’s never been anyone willing to say on or off-record which owners weren’t willing to vote to approve Crane in August. Speculating, it’s possible the Rangers might not have been keen to Crane. After all, Crane was part of a quickly cobbled together partnership with Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban that had them in the auction process for the Rangers that eventually saw a group headed by Nolan Ryan and Chuck Greenberg winning. The auction process drove the sale price up higher than expected, which didn’t exactly sit well with the new Rangers ownership group. The odd thing is, that sale likely played into how much Crane’s exceptionally large group is now paying for the Astros.

All that aside, at least 7 owners must have had questions about Crane as the move to approve ownership transfer requires 75 percent of the owners agreeing. Certainly, Drayton McLane is for it, so 75% of 29… you do the math.

Two weeks ago, Crane met with Commissioner Selig. What was discussed hasn’t been said in detail, but what is known is this: Bud wanted to hear directly what Crane’s story was on the character issues surrounding his company. It should be noted, he was never directly linked to the war-profiteering aspect – something that was done by regional execs in the Middle East – but rather, it occurred on his watch.

There’s also the move of the Astros to the American League West, something that has been said to be a lynch pin in Crane’s approval. To be clear, that is important, but the serious discussions about moving the Astos to the AL occurred as part of the August owners meetings after the vote on Crane had been delayed. As a source close to the situation has said repeatedly, “It’s a factor with Crane, but not number one.”

So, owners weren’t comfortable with Crane, sought more information, and now seem ready to vote for his approval during the Nov 15-16 meetings in Milwaukee.

The timing makes sense, as well.

There will no doubt be articles talking about Crane’s controversial elements that occurred at his companies. If you’re going to go there, you do so during the off-season. While the baseball media will have something to say, most fans will be talking about football and basketball (college, at least, and possibly NBA if the labor dispute is resolved). There will be less media churn than if Crane had been approved in August in advance of the postseason.

What will be interesting is knowing what Crane said to the Executive Board that has been created as part of the exceptionally large investor pool for the purchase. Crane is covering about 20% of the deal, while dozens of others make up the difference. As we reported yesterday, Crane and a lawyer flew to meet with league officials last week, and it’s likely that while he’s been told the votes are now there to approve, seeking compensation for moving to the AL could have been part of that meeting.

So, mark it down. Crane will get approved. It’s not in stone (see what happened to Miles Prentice at the 11th hour when he tried to purchase the Royals), but most everything points to his winning the day. Not since the league struggled to get an owners for the Los Angeles Dodgers have the owners hand wrung so much. That was a different situation, with different personalities, and certainly, different financing. But, stopping a $680 million deal, scuttling Crane’s group, and starting back over would not be good for the Astros in 2012 (and give Drayton McLane even more aggravation). After November, Crane gets the focus back to turning the Astros around on the field, and off the front office discussions that have swirled for months.

OTHER NEWS ACROSS THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK:


Maury BrownMaury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey, and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).

Follow Maury Brown on Twitter Twitter

Follow The Biz of Baseball on TwitterTwitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

Comments (11)Add Comment
0
Terrible
written by diego, October 18, 2011
It would be an awful move for the Astros to go to the AL. The way the fans have been treated this year and the to turn around and force this on them...it will be a long while before fans return. What was just a few years ago one of the highest home attendance teams will continue to be in the basement for some time.
0
Yet More Squirrely Reporting
written by BS Detector, October 18, 2011
One question. Has Crane agreed to move the franchise to the AL?

A reporter might want to relay this important piece of info.
0
Read
written by MauryB, October 18, 2011
There’s also the move of the Astros to the American League West, something that has been said to be a lynch pin in Crane’s approval. To be clear, that is important, but the serious discussions about moving the Astos to the AL occurred as part of the August owners meetings after the vote on Crane had been delayed. As a source close to the situation has said repeatedly, “It’s a factor with Crane, but not number one.”


It's not "squirrely reporting". The a*sumption is the group has agreed to move to the AL. But, it would be irresponsible at this point to say definitively that an agreement has been reached. If Crane is approved, the answer is likely, yes in 2013
0
To summarize
written by BS Detector, October 18, 2011
So, to summarize your reporting:

There were no questions prior the story about war profiteering. (Yet there was still no vote/approval prior to that date).

Then, the most important fact of all, Crane's war profiteering was uncovered. This event caused MLB to back off approval. Otherwise, they would have presumably approved the sale.

Meantime, there were allegations that a condition to move was asked of Crane. Hey don't look there you said, that is not important at all. Move along now, we can't have MLB portrayed as extortionists.

That has been your story. Amazingly, it still is.

Now, you say that Crane has agreed to move and shockingly, he now stands to be approved. Yet, he is still the dirty war profiteer he was in the summer, (readers now are asked to shut their brain off) but he is now being approved because he explained his war profiteering and MLB is now comfortable. It's certainly not his agreement to move. It couldn't be that. That was always, and still is secondary.

Do you understand how incredibly how full of holes this storyline is? Do you think all of your readers are fools? Seriously.

It is obvious that you were either duped all along, or simply a willing mouthpiece for MLB. Even after the fog disappears, you still maintain your impossible to digest storyline.
0
...
written by MauryB, October 18, 2011
I don't speak to how owners think, I just report on how they do.
0
Really?
written by BS Detector, October 18, 2011
You have been reporting for months that it was his character issues which were preventing approval. This isn't reporting what owners think?

Then you reported that debt was an issue. This isn't reporting what owners think?

You stated that issues with McCourt were concerning owners. This isn't reporting what owners think?

You have always said the move was not important. This isn't reporting what owners think?

0
article
written by Timboy, October 18, 2011
this article is all over the place. He WILL get approved, but it COULD change. Crane WILL get approved. It's NOT set in stone.
Which is it?
0
Not so fast...
written by Blake, October 19, 2011
I am wonder if the "exceptionally large investor pool" is scaring the other team owners. It's not just Crane they're approving, it's the whole family of investors. And have the owners scrutinized these other potential Astro "owners"?

The whole deal seems questionable; one of the highest selling prices for a MLB team (Crane and Co. didn't even negotiate), questionable majority owner, dozens of investor, large purchase price financed by debt, financial woes of Dodgers & Mets, and more.

Didn't we think we had signed Randy Johnson and Carlos Beltran to multi-year contracts? It ain't over 'till the ink on the contract is dried.
0
agreed
written by A.F., October 19, 2011
Everywhere you look in this deal, MLB has a reason to reject it. High debt? Check. Huge list of investors? Check. Buyer with a questionable background who caused problems in the past (e.g., Rangers last year)? Check. MLB seems to be making a deal with the devil here to accomplish an objective.
0
I don't see the problem with the reporting
written by RDerringer, October 20, 2011
I honestly don't get the criticism of Brown's reporting. To have an issue with how the story has apparently 'changed', one would have to a*sume the owners are a hive mind. (100% agreement on everything)

Is it really a stretch to understand some owners may have an issue with the debt, while other owners have an issue with the character, and even other owners have interests in an Astros move?

This whole Crane story is one big political play with folks scrambling to get votes. Brown's reporting has been professional throughout.
0
...
written by A.F., October 21, 2011
I think what people are saying is that Maury has been drawing the wrong conclusions, not that his reporting has been bad.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?
 

404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /components/com_bmtj/local/tent.php was not found on this server.


Apache/2.2.16 (Ubuntu) Server at www.alentejo.pt Port 80