valtrex 1000 mg online prednisone tabs 20mg buy viagra indianapolis cheap overnight cialis cipro nome generico obat zithromax 200 mg glucophage 500 mg bijsluiter lisinopril actavis 20mg propranolol mk 40 mg cialis sweden buy generic cialis sun order propecia uk cialis equivalente generico 0.5 mg propecia eod generic viagra spain cialis lilly 5 mg propranolol anxiety 40 mg levitra 20mg fta metformin 500mg bristol buy viagra kamagra cialis generico soft cialis 5mg holland cialis lilly 20mg buy nolvadex generic viagra buy leeds viagra 50 100 mg viagra generico guadalajara synthroid . 1 mg levitra 5 mg schmelztabletten to buy xenical generic viagra ingredients cortancyl 20mg prednisone buy cipro xr 500 mgs in cialis lisinopril 5 mg pill fda generic cialis xenical generico prezzo good online viagra montreal viagra online levitra 5 mg alcohol wellbutrin 300 mg beipackzettel cheap viagra with cipro 500 mg antibiotics augmentin 250 mg zawiesina lexapro 10 mg buy cialis 5mg perth canadia viagra generic doxycycline acne generic generic for wellbutrin 2012 online store xenical cialis 20mg ellily tadalafil cialis 50 mg buy cytotec cebu viagra online atlantic buy injectable phenergan cialis 5 mg rate priligy generico farmacia cialis 5 mg take 30mg cialis ciprofloxacin cipro generic prednisone dog mg cheap celebrex 200mg augmentin 625mg tablets amoxil tm 500 mg zithromax 500mg precio buspar 10mg reviews buying safe cialis generic cialis problem buy cialis korea nexium generic image generic wellbutrin bloating comanda viagra online lexapro dosage 20 mg augmentin pediatrico 125 mg inderal propranolol 10mg levitra online info buy nolvadex injections cipro 750mg super cialis online propranolol la 40mg kamagra 100 mg wirkung buy cialis singapore buspar overdose mg lexapro generic options cialis 2 20mg pills cialis canadian 40mg cipla generic viagra 80 mg nolvadex tetracycline kapsul 500 mg cialis paypal buy cytotec et img nexium cost generic buy zoloft online wellbutrin retard 300 mg 10mg cialis generic prednisone 20 mg pill cipro 1000 mg bula bactrim fast cheap online propecia subscription metformin pcos 500 mg cialis 10 mg vs 20 buy viagra inatlanta viagra online overseas lisinopril 20 mg cost celebrex 200mg capsulas viagra online bankeinzug augmentin mylan generics nexium 20 mg nedir chinese 800 mg viagra lisinopril 10 mg price getting wellbutrin online generic viagra 25 pricing cialis 20mg buy lasix 80 mg jual cialis 80 mg generic synthroid cost harga zovirax 200 mg 100mg viagra generic antidepressants citalopram 20mg prednisone dose mg illegal buy kamagra xenical generic version cytotec bh mg comprar lexapro 15 mg 80mg cialis flashback 2.5mg lexapro pregnancy buy cialis 10mg strattera 25 mg capsule generic lexapro kaiser buy zithromax thailand day 17 zoloft 25 mgs doxycycline 75 mg generic sildon generic viagra synthroid order online viagra generico yahoo cialis penang buy augmentin duo 125 mg prednisone 4 mg kg lisinopril lupin 40 mg prednisone 5mg ndc synthroid 0.088 mg daily viagra generico sandoz periactin buy online erythromycin cream online diflucan 50 mg prospecto 10mg of levitra 5 mg of lexapro clomid 50 mg buy viagra generico 300mg buy lisinopril 40 mg nexium 40 mg otc cheapest viagra 800mg zithromax 600 mg price test cialis 20mg levitra 20mg alberta lisinopril 20 mg infarmed cialis super 60 mg generic kamagra online viagra 150mg overdose viagra 100mg tabs bactrim nombre generico buy bactrim liquid buy propecia answers 1000 mg prednisone iv nexium generic availability viagra 50 mg бrak viagra online secure korea generic viagra viagra generico rischi levitra 10 mg nedir strattera 100mg capsule lexapro generics australia starting 20 mg lexapro clomid steroids buy erythromycin suspension 125mg pill zoloft 50 mg cialis generic 20 kl buy viagra tratamiento lexapro 10 mg 20mg cialis experience celebrex 100 mg costo zithromax 600 mg dosage medicament cialis 10 mg viagra online ny buying clomid online lasix 20 mg diuretico zithromax online bestellen lexapro 10 mg recreational cheapest lexapro 10mg australia viagra buy 20 mg lexapro half clomid 50 mg posologie buy propecia usa viagra 50mg cost buy doxycycline injection medication cipro 500 mg cipro 750 mg filmtabl buspar generic for rush cialis online buy viagra sa cialis 5 mg efektet doxycycline online cheap nexium 40 mg po generic bactrim ingredients generic lexapro information clomid online drugs 40 mg lexapro levitra online pharmacy 500mg er metformin levitra vardenafil generico generic for lexapro 2011 5mg cialis samples generico de propecia cialis order paypal clomid 50 mg buy celebrex generic names mg. de cialis generic bactrim cream viagra generico espanha generic cipro 500mg cialis 20mg preise generic zoloft breastfeeding nexium 40mg fungsinya generic viagra echeck cheap cialis phillipines 20 mg lexapro generic viagra fourm cialis 5 mg durata valtrex epocrates online viagra online ua generic cialis cost cipro mg cialis 20 mg. india 125 mg of clomid buy zithromax use online viagra review cialis cheap 200 mg cialis everyday online strattera 18 mg pill cytotec mg lexapro tablets 20mg periactin 2mg 5ml generic cialis 48 pack tetracycline online kaufen lexapro 10mg indicaciones propecia canada online order Cialis 20 viagra 50 mg 4 pack doxycycline accord 100 mg viagra online.it buy zoloft brand buy samples viagra bactrim forte 800 mg doxycycline 100mg abscess cialis 10 mg enough strattera 100mg cost generic lisinopril india gettableonline cialis viagra 100mg color citalopram 5 mg anxiety viagra au online priligy 60mg tablets strattera 40mg capsules viagra buy australia prednisone 5 mg kegunaannya cialis dosages 10mg augmentin duo 457 mg purchase nolvadex online lexapro 10 mg wiki trusty online viagra valtrex 500 mg kullanimi generic lisinopril hctz buy hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg prospecto cialis 5 mg medicamento lasix 40 mg viagra vegeta 200mgl viagra online germany clomid 50 mg tabletki cgv buy kamagra 300 mgs wellbutrin augmentin 500 mg dosage zithromax liquid buy cheap synthroid doxycycline mg acne levitra 20mg com composition augmentin 500 mg ordering clomid online buy viagra rx lasix 12.5mg cost celebrex generic dosage 20mg lexapro dangerous wellbutrin xr 300 mg lasix 10 mg compresse buy nexium pharmacy zithromax 250 mg 6 kaps lexapro cheap 50 mg viagra online zovirax iv 250mg generic cialis 25 blaster cialis generic cialis generic Washington india cheap viagra 20mg cialis canada cheap real cialis augmentin 156 mg syrup prednisone 5mg tabs cheap professional cialis zovirax generic price cialis 5mg comprar prednisone 60 mg dog clomid 50mg grossesse generic lexapro 5 mg cipla cialis 5mg 250 mg zoloft nausea vanzari viagra 50mg 40mg cialis potency celebrex 400 mg price viagra buy tesco cialis sklep online levitra 5 mg precio cialis 40mg overnight buy generic lasix cialis dosage 800mg viagra 100mg erfahrung wellbutrin xl 75 mg online viagra genuine zovirax cheap prices cheap viagra equivalent kamagra 100 mg reviews buy zithromax prescription viagra cheap review diflucan 100 mg 30 days 50mg of clomid levitra orosolubile 20 mg 100mg viagra cost prednisone 30 mg online generic tetracycline 500mg generic zovirax dosage synthroid 0.05mg generic wellbutrin pulled lasix 500mg price viagra 50 mg 2 tablet 10mg lexapro wellbutrin generic brand zithromax buy uk clomid lasix generic equivalent online doctors viagra weakest propecia 2mg lasix 60 mg iv purchase 2.5 mg cialis indonesia cialis online lisinopril 10 mg images levitra online versand geniric viagra 150 mg 12.5 mg phenergan cheap online kamagra 150 mg clomid multiples levitra tablets buy online viagra business buy nolvadex walgreens cheap propecia alternative tadalafil 5 mg cialis clomid 50mg works cialis 10mg hinta viagra 100mg function Levitra 180 pills order zithromax azithromycin 500 mg 40mg cialis effect 40mgs of cialis buy viagra cipla sordera por viagra cialis generico dosis australia cialis online nexium 40mg brasil buy zithromax individual kamagra online cheapest generic medicine propecia taking 2 5 mg cialis viagra online mumbai cialis uk cheap 300 mg zoloft dosage cialis 20 mg cheap valtrex online wellbutrin 150 mg seizure cytotec 200 mg prix generic lexapro better order doxycycline online levitra 20 mg viagra lexapro cost 20 mg viagra online ecuador cialis 20mg 8x buy cialis melbourne dosage cialis 40mg zithromax pediatric 600 mg generic esomeprazole nexium 150mg diflucan order doxycycline 1oomg pastillas viagra generico cialis 3000 mg cialis 20mg uk nexium order canada generico viagra eurofarma obsidian 25 mg propranolol buy 5 day zithromax clomid online 50mg doxycycline 100 mg ingredients levitra 20mg jellies lisinopril 30 mg prednisone online us prospect augmentin 1000 mg generic valtrex wiki online cialis prices drinking 20mg lexapro nolvadex buy canada prospecto cialis 20 mg buying levitra australia propecia online hong order lasix online amoxil 500mg alcohol cheap viagra you 12.5 mg viagra effective kamagra gel buy order Cialis 120 lexapro generic wean prednisone 20 mg teva 50mg levitra cheap zoloft 100 mg cialis 10 mg effects 40mg of levitra xenical buying 100. mg kamagra online doxycycline 100mg tabs metformin 750 mg xr levitra generic us generic viagra walgreens viagra price 25 mg buy glucophage 500mg viagra generic long 5 mg lexapro usage prednisone 20mg. mayo cialis 10 mgbeograd viagra 50 mg effect zoloft tic disorders dapoxetine online india 100mg viagra street generic lexapro fda kegunaan nexium 40 mg 200 mg generic viagra cialis 5 10mg thuoc kamagra 5omg augmentin 1000 mg sr generic cialis craigslist cialis 20mg effets buy 4 dose zithromax cialis preis 20 mg online cialis safe augmentin 625mg uk order prescription viagra 5 mg cialis price cheap kamagra plus generic zovirax available duracion cialis 20 mg clomid 10mg cheap cialis line viagra buy contest cheap cialis drugs doxycycline onlineamerica amoxil 500 mg toothache pfizer viagra 25mg Generic Levitra order wellbutrin sr100mg cialis 5mg 28 st nexium 40 mg alternative xenical 120 mg formulation generic zoloft medication generic cipro 600mg cialis india 5mg buy nolvadex hcg paypal viagra generic viagra 50mg chats viagra generico brasil online viagra reliable 20mg generic levitra propranolol 10mg order zovirax lasix price 500 mg viagra 50 mg use 5mg cialis nedir lasix 30 mg bijsluiter buy cipro tabs levitra 10 or 20 mg valtrex online cheap doxycycline 500 mg. kamagra online nachnahme xenical 120 mg 84 cap lexapro 20 mg tabs cialis 40 mg tablets viagra 50 mg etkileri zithromax 250 mg tablets
Home All Articles The Matsuzaka Dilemma

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 552 guests online

Atom RSS

The Matsuzaka Dilemma PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Articles & Opinion
Written by John Thorn   
Tuesday, 12 December 2006 08:15

Article

John Thorn is a contributing writer for The Biz of Baseball 

From "Play's the Thing," Woodstock Times: 

This whole swirl may be over by the time you read this, but the meaning is the same, no matter how it comes out, and so is the moral. I’m talking about the sequence in which the Boston Red Sox were revealed to have outbid other baseball clubs for the thirty-day negotiating rights to “posted” Seibu Lion pitcher Daisuke Matsuzaka, who wishes to pitch in the United States but is not, under Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB) regulations, eligible for free agency until 2008. This Thursday night at midnight, when December 14 becomes December 15, is the witching hour.

As I write, Boston Red Sox executives have just landed the owner’s plane on the West Coast to plant themselves on agent Scott Boras’s doorstep. His Japanese client is mum on the seeming breakdown in negotiations, but as he has not fired his representative one may deduce that he is in on the game. It is a game designed by Major League Baseball (MLB) and the NPB, but as they seem only dimly to have understood their own rules, D-Mat and his designated hitter have made their own—or rather, as we shall see, correctly fathomed the implicit rule structure of the posting system. Bottom line: no matter how this shakes out, while D-Mat is not exactly the reincarnation of Curt Flood, Scott Boras has taken the mantle of Marvin Miller, and is my new hero. 

Yesterday I had lunch at the local Chinese restaurant where, despite my better judgment, I ate my customary sacramental portion of the stale fortune cookie and read its message. “It is better to have a hen tomorrow than an egg today” was the word from on high. Wait, I thought; this reverses the more commonly expressed wisdom that not only is an egg today better than a hen tomorrow, but also its avian corrolary about birds in hand and those in the bush. I wondered: might Boras have received the same, seemingly counterintuitive message?

Let’s back up for a moment and see how we got here. In the system by which a player is to be posted, both the team and player must agree on the posting. The team then notifies the NPB Commissioner’s Office that the player will be posted, which then notifies MLB, which notifies all of its teams. The MLB teams then have four days to submit a closed bid for the right to negotiate a contract with the player. If the high bid is accepted by the NPB team holding the player’s rights, the winning MLB team has thirty days to reach an agreement with the player. If the bid is rejected, the player is not “posted.” If the player signs a contract with the MLB team by the end of the signing period, then the NPB team receives the bid money. If the player does not sign a contract with the MLB team by the end of the signing period, the player is returned to the NPB team and the NPB team receives nothing.

Whoever designed this may have had in mind that classic scenario of game theory called the “Prisoner’s Dilemma.” It is a mathematical and psychological game illustrating how rational actions by individuals may not always lead to positive outcomes for either the individuals or the group. The Prisoner’s Dilemma is described neatly in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

“Tanya and Cinque have been arrested for robbing the Hibernia Savings Bank and placed in separate isolation cells. Both care much more about their personal freedom than about the welfare of their accomplice. A clever prosecutor makes the following offer to each. ‘You may choose to confess or remain silent. If you confess and your accomplice remains silent I will drop all charges against you and use your testimony to ensure that your accomplice does serious time. Likewise, if your accomplice confesses while you remain silent, they will go free while you do the time. If you both confess I get two convictions, but I’ll see to it that you both get early parole. If you both remain silent, I’ll have to settle for token sentences on firearms possession charges. If you wish to confess, you must leave a note with the jailer before my return tomorrow morning.’

“The ‘dilemma’ faced by the prisoners here is that, whatever the other does, each is better off confessing than remaining silent. But the outcome obtained when both confess is worse for each than the outcome they would have obtained had both remained silent. A common view is that the puzzle illustrates a conflict between individual and group rationality. A group whose members pursue rational self-interest may all end up worse off than a group whose members act contrary to rational self-interest. More generally, if the payoffs are not assumed to represent self-interest, a group whose members rationally pursue any goals may all meet less success than if they had not rationally pursued their goals individually. Puzzles with this structure were devised and discussed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher in 1950, as part of the Rand Corporation’s investigations into game theory (which Rand pursued because of possible applications to global nuclear strategy).” 

So, the underlying scheme of Prisoner’s Dilemma is to have the two prisoners collaborate wittingly or unwittingly against their own interest, with the outcome weighted to benefit the sate as represented by the police and prosecutor. The dilemma resides in the fact that each prisoner has a choice between only two options, but cannot make a good decision without knowing what the other one will do.

I suggest that the posting system was created along these lines to benefit the “state”—each league and each team involved. Think of MLB and Boston as the police and prosecutor in the above scenario, knowing that the salutary actions of Prisoner A (NPB and Seibu) and Prisoner B (Matsuzaka and Boras) are necessary to prevent the mutually assured destruction (M.A.D.) of MLB. That was the prospect some owners envisioned in 1973-74, at the dawn of free agency: that in an auction scenario, dollars would pursue scarce/unique assets in an irrationally exuberant way that would effectively transfer control of the game into the players’ hands. Marvin Miller cleverly assuaged the owners’ fears while assuring high prices for his players’ union by restricting free agency to those with six years’ service in the major leagues; had he opted for universal free agency, as he might have, the flood of talent onto the market each year would have depressed salaries. 

The design problem in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game above is that Prisoner Seibu has its deal in hand and is (ostensibly) denied the option of contributing some of its $51.1 million posting fee from Boston toward Prisoner Matsuzaka’s new contract. Indeed, without flexibility the fortunes of Seibu/NPB are more closely tied to the Police/Prosecutor than to Matsuzaka despite the pitcher’s total control over Seibu’s posting windfall. Boston, which stands ready to pay the sum and call it a bargain, instead feels aggrieved because its $51.1 million in expense is counted as nothing by Boras, who is looking to obtain $100 million for a six-year contract, pretty much in line with what his client would fetch in an unrestricted market. Boston had intended to pay out $100 million, all right, but had figured that Boras would give the club credit for half of that for “liberating” his client. No such luck, nor should there have been.

The posting system entices Boston (and other bidding clubs) with the lure of paying for a free agent in a tangential way that would not increase its exposure to luxury tax. The Red Sox are further compensated by considering the payment to Seibu as an inexpensive licensing or entry fee to market their brand vigorously in Japan. Additionally, the exclusivity that came with their winning bid permitted them not only to pursue Matsuzaka, but also to defend against the Yankees landing him. 

With its $51.1 million sugarplum, Seibu thought it was being rewarded for having nurtured Matsuzaka’s talent to the point that he was one of the top five pitchers in the world, and for graciously letting him go to America two years before NPB regulations would otherwise allow. In fact Seibu was also being pulled out of a very considerable financial hole, as the posting fee hits up on their bottom line as pure net income ... plus they gain at least $12 million in the amount they would otherwise have had to pay Matsuzaka for 2007 and 2008, the last years of his contract with the Lions.

MLB/Boston is in effect attempting to coerce a “confession” from Prisoner Matsuzaka because he risks embarrassment by returning to pitch for Seibu after 36,000 fans bade him farewell at the Lions’ Stadium, and because Seibu doesn’t want him back at the forfeiture of $63 million it is already counting on. 

What did MLB and the 29 teams not in the running for D-Mat’s services gain by the posting system? A presumptive lid on D-Mat’s demands and their escalating effect on pitcher salaries, already heightened by the ineffectual Adam Eaton and the awful Justin Marquis, each of whom received multiyear contracts at about $8 million per. With Matsuzaka wearing carmine hose, MLB will gain a new hero to promote its brand in Japan as well as the USA, just as Ichiro proved a marketing windfall. In fact this posting system is a nostalgic throwback, recreating for owners a glimpse of the paradise they enjoyed prior to free agency, when they owned the market and could say “take it or leave it” to the players. While the posting system may have been born of a genuine wish to protect Japanese baseball and avoid the appearance of American cultural imperialism, it has played out as an exercise in “Who will rule.”

As Boras has evidently surmised, even though MLB and NPB thought they had boxed in Prisoner Matsuzaka, it turned out that he and his client were not locked in behind iron bars but instead, like Br’er Rabbit, had been thrown into a briar patch from which they could easily escape. Boras has recognized that while the game is structured like Prisoner’s Dilemma, counting upon Seibu and his client to act independently in their perceived self-interest to the benefit of Organized Baseball, there is in fact only one prisoner, and without his yielding, there is no palatable outcome. 

If MLB and NPB had a game theory for how this would play itself out, it was the wrong one ... styled as Prisoner’s Dilemma but quickly revealing itself to be the “Dollar Auction,” another, even more vicious game, in which each of two contestants seeks to overpay for an asset in order to avoid being the second-place bidder whose money will have been utterly wasted.

In the Dollar Auction someone offers to sell a dollar bill to the highest bidder. The highest bidder will get the dollar, but the second-highest must also pay what he bid yet get nothing in return. Think here of “throwing good money after bad,” of “saving face,” of “having too much invested to cut and run,” of “staying the course.” If you can buy a dollar for a dime, this looks like a good deal. Even as the bidding rises in ten-cent increments to the 50-cent level, it still seems a bargain. At the 70-cent level, one may expect that all but two bidders will have fallen off the chase. When the dollar-mark is reached, the underbidder, rather than accepting defeat, will tend to bid ten cents more so as not to lose 90 cents. 

“People escalate their commitment both to justify their earlier bids and to prevent the financial and ego loss of coming in second,” Max H. Bazerman wrote in Psychology Today twenty years ago. “No specific bid is clearly wrong, since it is rational to bid ‘just another 10 cents,’ if the other party is about to quit bidding. But when both parties think this way, an escalatory spiral emerges that is very reminiscent of the Vietnam War and other international and industrial failures in which both competitors get trapped by their previous commitments.”

At first blush the winner in the Matsuzaka Dilemma appeared to be Boston; if the Mets were second, at $13 million less, they felt no ill consequence of their bid. Had the posting system had been a true Dollar Auction, with succesive rounds of bidding,  rather than a veiled Prisoner’s Dilemma with closed bids, the price for D-Mat might have gone much higher, as the underbidder would have been highly motivated to stay in the game. But now Boston’s inadvertent partner has been revealed not to be MLB but Seibu, which unlike Boston—which will retain the defensive benefit of its bid—will lose everything, as if it had been the underbidder in a Dollar Auction. And Br’er Boras and D-Mat, if they do not prevail this year, can play again only with more bargaining clout. 

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?