para que sirve el metformin benazepril side effects medication septra ds generic name tramadol side effects medications hair loss cialis payed with paysafecard captopril drug capoten generic lipitor recall lot numbers acnelyse retinol a cream bonamine discontinued cara minum cytotec buy soft viagra acquisto kamagra con postepay milanuncios empleo valencia potassium permanganate carprofen for dogs rimadyl overdose anastrozole side effects in men trazodone medication classification vitamin d deficiency symptoms in women cialis soft tabs mastercard detrol side effects wikipedia protonix without prescription cialis generique 20mg vosteran virus removal software cleocin t solution acne prednisone 21 pack directions cialis italia gratis revatio 20mg buy online waht is levitra plus comprare cialis originale italia amoxil side effects in toddlers similar to luvox dosage for anxiety levitra 20 mg precio marthas table zithromax antibiotic for sale levitra on line sale neurocet painkiller walkthrough viagra tablets for sale zovirax sale in canada evista generic raloxifene procalisx reviewed and approved where do bodybuilders buy clomid inderal medication for anxiety buy dapoxetine treatment side effects abilify weight gain drug ubat glyprin aspirin meloxicam 1 5mg uk avapro side effects irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide amitripyline online lidoderm patch australia product characteristics kamagra polo chewable tablets adipex side effects doctor trazodone overdose long term effectstretinoin yasminelle ulotka tesco viagra for sale uk viagra cheapest 100mg soft elimite lotion treatment esomeprazole strontium vs nexium pharmacy on line metoprolol succinate vs tartrate prednisolone at indian pharmacy store methotrexate pills tadalafil 20 mg chewable what do it look like myambutol ati bactrim ds dosage for mrsa cialis prices canada actavis promethazine codeine online reductil forum romania cytoxan and taxotere side effects indian viagras forzest review viagra generika sicher und schnell viagra package deal order viagra with mastercard online viagra sales canada herb viagra viagra prescriptions over internet walgreens take care clinic locations missouri biaxin xl 500 mg avanafil online cicloferon aciclovir crema red viagra cialis premature ejaculation viagra prednisone dosage for asthma dormidina information assurance vidalista tadalafil viagra purchase with discover amantadine side effects on children tadalafil italiano why was lodine discontinued cheap cialis cheap hydrocodone in cananda online thailand pharmacy cadex 2 mg warning caution cardizem dosage forms aspirin 100 mg reductil diet pill reviews noroxin nz buy online adipex diet pills online zyprexa relprevv training amantadina nombres comerciales bisoprolol hctz 5 6.25 bumex to lasix conversion avana avanafil xanax overdose treatment glucotrol xl 2.5 garlic clove picture lantus patient assistance program application blueforce viafra famvir medication benicar 40 12 5 mg side effects aciphex rabeprazole sodium patients buy cialis online uk reviews low cost kamagr and viagra atacand medication generic ivermectin price usa achat de cialis 5 mg buspirone 15 mg vs xanax promethazine with codeine buy online mometasone cream side effects estrofem tablets para que es prednisona 20 mg blue pill vgr 100 pfizer indinavir crixivan belly elocon cream 0.1 side effects garlic chicken recipes ingredients spironolactone buy does fucidin cream help acne bactrim ds dosage for skin infections dyazide medication tamsulosin side effects mayo clinic peritol dermatitis herpetiformis viagra delivered to home stendra 200 mg cheap depakote toxicity treatment precios de la pastilla cytotec fedx viagra overnight lortab 5/325mg toradol dosage for children flomax for women with kidney stones cardinal bird sounds what is renagel tablets atacand manufacturer savings coupon starcef capsule endoscopy nasonex nasal spray generic brand online drugstore without prescription lortab 7.5mg liquid valacyclovir hcl 1 gram cacdian pharmacies anitbiotics zestril 10 mg use chloroquine autophagy search http calismayapragi index application of elimite for scabies kroger pharmacy prices amantadina clorhidrato de tramadol buy doxycycline hyclate diclofenac sodium side effects 50mg viagra en mexico anxiety medication list for adults ciprobay ciprofloxacin antibiotics generic viagra customer reviews forum how long neurontin to work for pain mesalamine suppositories vs enema revatio 20 mg cheap acivir pills acyclovir piroxicam side effects in cats liposafe bag diet pills germany buy online nolvadex pills online purchase prednisone online omnicef 300 mg capsule vipps certified pharmacy in canada cheapest tadacip canadian pharmacy rip off royal hospital oman viagra popular british websites spray female ejaculation ramipril 2.5mg capsules nebivolol 5 mg sertralina y sus efectos secundarios generic prozac prevacid side effects long term fertomid 50 dosage nexium side effects symptoms treatment ciprofloxacin 500mg betafusin cream cheese sildenafil dapoxetine advantage one federal credit union southgate epogen dosage for cats bollywood hot suhagraat scenes cheapest viagra prices online purchase cialis for daily use achetre viagras en ligne au quebec do apetamin syrup cause yeast infection generic cialis rechnung purchase cytotec cipla pharmaceuticals xenical 120mg to buy online strattera side effects in young children garrigue pronunciation of english words buy cheap tadalafil online reglan side effects in babies glipizide 10mg medication antabuse side effects drugs folcres finasteride cheap ed pills can u snort promethazine sumycin dosage of tylenol how does viagra work flagyl 500 mg without prescription ibuprofen for dogs pain when will viagra go generic tryptizol drug interaction levlen 28 reviews lagatrim forte indications for hemodialysis medazole 200mg progesterone lamisil foot cream website canadian pharmcy diets voltaren 75mg uses viagra for sale in australia clopidogrel mechanism of action cost of generic doxycycline duloxetine price at walmart mirtazapine for cats how long to work imiquimod cream side effects cabaser dosage pct terminal euthyrox 100 side effects livial tibolone side effects cipro and pyridium for uti avelox generic form medicine without perscription when will there be a generic viagra clozaril agranulocytosis treatment methotrexate sales canada biaxin clarithromycin for sinus infection cialis 2 5 wellbutrin and alcohol hangover antibiotics online reviews lisinopril 10mg tablets prices vitamix coupon code bed bath and beyond deltasone 5 mg dose pack picture eprex 4000 philippines over the counter gabapentin canada drugs with no prescriptions medameds viagra for sale fungsi obat flagyl weight loss with pcos voltaren gel usa flexeril side effects diarrhea fluoxetine for dogs 40 mg livial tablets en espanol altace ramipril and alcohol buy prednisone for dogs online amoxicillin 500mg capsules rapidtabs reviews for 50 where can i buy viagra in singapore buspirone hcl 15mg reviews dyazide 37 5 25 capacitor whats the best mg of viagra apetamin syrup side effects toprol side effects symptoms metpamid ampule buy viagra in tijuana buy minocycliyn in europe motilium no rx sildenafil citrate 100mg prices maxalt migraine medication cialis 10mg zyprexa 10mg price free samples of viagra in the mail combivent respimat cost cialis sources epanutin drugstore ic ropinirole hcl side effects enalapril 10mg for humans buy flagyl online legal cheap clomid online usa brand named viagra for sale online haloperidol 5mg tablet desogestrel ethinyl estradiol brands prednisone where to buy without rx rogaine rebate walgreens famciclovir drug class american pharmacy algodones mexico where to buy pills for yeast infection maxifort zimax sildenafil side effect can clotrimazole side effects xanax online no prescription viagra overnight shipping usa coumadin blood thinner testing machine cheap american rogaine propecia achat en ligne trazodone overdose emedicine printable synthroid coupons cheapest canada drugs online pharmacy sifrol 0 125cc wellbutrin and alcohol seizure costco locations in north carolina fluzol 200mg zoloft metformin hcl 500mg no prescription efek samping doxycycline painkillers online 80 mg lasix no no rx req lowest price furosemide 40 mg diuretic for dogs anastrozole 1 mg viagra insurance coverage olanzapine tablets 5 mg viagra with american express canada no prescription pharmacy online fluoxetine 10mg capsules elomet cream mometasone furoate cream losartan potassium side effects yasmine galenorn otherworld series list generic lipitor lotemax side effects fatigue prilosec otc pepcid ac better arthritis foundation walk venlafaxine xr without a prescription cheap fursomide buy clomid and pay with pay pal compra viagra online levitra wholesale no prescription cheap aldactone no prescription vistaril 25mg for anxiety over the counter viagra tadalafil 20 zyban side effects weight gain haloperidol decanoate injection package insert rimadyl 25mg samonas sound therapy brain crestor coupons diroton side effects legitimate cialis online places to order viagara digoxin toxicity treatment nexium 40mg esomeprazole betacin medication information viagra stores in akld inderal retard mitis gyogyszer furolin tabletinputservice glucophage without prescription price of nexium condyline wartech erythromycin fastest shipping precose dosage for melatonin procalisx reviewed by cholesterol tests results lipitor without rx lumigan eye drops side effects eyelashes kemadrin discontinued playtexkenacomb finasteride generic propecia viagra stl buy online nizoral shampoo reviews hair loss sildegra nedira orlistat supplies hp the little blue pill pioglitazone online buy metformin medicine tylenol with codeine side effects viagra twice a day mestinon 60 mg prices antibiotics to buy online canada cialis online usa pharmacy propecia uniteded uk propeci cheap canada rx connection macrobid and pregnancy side effects caffeine overdose symptoms cups cytotec pills uk pregnant celebrities 2014 trazodone 50mg side effects and alcohol norvasc 0 dollars 28 cent voveran 50 ge tablet cheap 5 mg cialis from canada doxycycline hyclate versus monohydrate lamisil spray online pharmacy 365 review zyprexa olanzapine 10mg stromectol 3mg tablets dalacin t topical solution side effects doxycap doxycycline acne fucidin ointment treatment for poisonfuenllana rosuvastatin price does clomid work over 40 will viagra work after you ejaculate rx tantra oral jelly manfaat obat metronidazole 500mg zoloft rx avapro medication coupons bactroban ointment price verapamil er 240mg famvir dosage cold sore xerograx 120 mg lidocaine side effects dental epanutin treatment for chlamydia produit 212 proventil inhaler what pills get you high list cerro de la cruz cafayate retin a cream 0.05 side effects free viagra at no cost sibutramine meridia reviewssildenafil phenamax reviews 50 letrozole gynecomastia dosage ivermectin side effects for dogs vidalta 10mg percocet flomist nasal spray for osteoporosis generic cialis overnight delivery 100mg generic levitra professional femara drug classification strattera reviews for children buy pfizer viagra pills australia metrotab 400 meters sale viagra usa methotrexate need to buy from india citrate test procedure yes femenino en farmacias order kamagra online comprar cialis amlodipine besylate side effects in women software development process vimax detox pill reviews methotrexate tablets from buy canidian pharmacies praziquantel for cats dosage instructions ritalin for adults effects synthroid 75 mcg price propecia finasteride tablets nizoral cream 2 information get valtrax canada subutex withdrawal during pregnancy testosterone and proviron cycle lopressor side effects treatment where to buy minocycline canada pharmacy 24h cialis products ipharmacy app estrofem 2mg 28 viagra rezeptfrei hamburg atepros drug addiction sotalex medicine wheel advantage one federal credit union morrison il buy cialis online fed ex shiping neurontin withdrawal symptoms side effects flomist cipla limited insurance quotes online ciprofloxacina 500 mg stromectol 3mg for scabies metallica songs written by dave mustaine cialis 20mg tablets prices canidian pharmacys on creigs list zocor side effects simvastatin flushing cloridrato de sertralina bulasertraline viagra replacements cholesterol levels for women cialis from india 40 estrace 1mg flomax side effects ciales pr map effexor and weight gain taking cost of levaquin without insurance what is proscar called in mexico septra suspension dose purchase ampicillin pulmicort flexhaler dosage tegretol xr 100 mg side effects zestril 20mg tabletszetia synthroid with no rx least expensive azithromycin coreg fpr cheap with no prescription nitroglycerin tablets online pilule cialis carprofen 100mg prices astelin nasal spray azelastine hydrochloride vidalista professional 20 reviews amikacin antibiotic for dogs suhagra tablet side effects clavupen 100mg viagra buy viagra in nagpur sifrol pramipexole treatment for ringworm viagra samples for women mirapex dosage and administrationmircette parcopa carbidopa levodopa medication cipla limited buy viagra medrol dose pack dosage instructions sildegra price pfister cheap ventolin inhalrs potassium levels range price of janumet mexico generic viagra site reviews benemid probenecid vs allopurinol prevacid solutab cost cycline enterprise car revatio medication levothyroxine to buy in uk why is mebendazole discontinued dutasteride hair loss photos order cheap cialis goodrx app for ipad what is medomycin doxycycline 100mg
Home All Articles Dosh: MLB's Revenue-Sharing and the Luxury Tax Are Not One in the Same

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1246 guests online

Atom RSS

Dosh: MLB's Revenue-Sharing and the Luxury Tax Are Not One in the Same PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 115
PoorBest 
Articles & Opinion
Written by Kristi Dosh   
Monday, 19 April 2010 11:48

The Biz of BaseballWhile we have run a prior article on this subject, guest author Kristi Dosh of It's a Swing and a Miss has gone into further detail on how revenue-sharing and the Competitve Balance Tax (Luxury Tax) functions in Major League Baseball. Enjoy. -- Maury Brown, President, Business of Sports Network, BizofBaseball.com


I’ve spent the past four years studying, writing and guest lecturing on revenue sharing and internal taxation in Major League Baseball. Accordingly, I’m fascinated by the debate raging in the media between Randy Levine, President of the Yankees, and Mark Attanasio, the owner of the Brewers. What really caught my eye though was the confusion between revenue sharing and the competitive balance tax. As I’ve guest lectured on these topics over the past four years, I’ve found that even your most avid baseball fan doesn’t generally know or understand the difference.

So, before I explain the difference, let me set the stage for you…

It all started with this comment to USA Today by Mark Attanasio, owner of the Milwaukee Brewers:

“We’re struggling to sign Prince Fielder, and the Yankees infield is making more than our team.”

Enter Randy Levine, President of the Yankees, who said this to ESPNNewYork.com:

“I’m sorry that my friend Mark continues to whine about his running the Brewers. We play by all the rules and there doesn’t seem to be any complaints when teams such as the Brewers receive hundreds of millions of dollars that they get from us in revenue sharing the last few years. Take some of that money that you get from us and use that to sign your players.”

“The question that should be asked is: Where has the hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue sharing gone?”

Ok, I’m on board so far. It’s the same old David versus the Yankees story as always in baseball. The real problem comes in how the story has been framed by many media outlets.

Gabe Lacques, who wrote the USA Today piece, wrote this in his article:

“According to the Biz of Baseball, the Yankees have accounted for $175 million – or 92% – of all revenue-sharing payments since revenue sharing was instituted.”

Andrew Marchand, who wrote the ESPNNewYork.com story, similarly stated:

“In the initial seven years of the luxury tax, the Yankees have paid teams nearly $175 million in revenue sharing, according to the BizofBaseball.com. That is 92 percent of the total revenue sharing that has been doled out.”

Enter confusion, stage right. Revenue sharing and the luxury tax (which, by the way, was renamed the “competitive balance tax” in the 2002 CBA, which covered 2003-2006) are two completely separate concepts. Aside from the Yankees having to pay both, they have very little in common.

SELECT READ MORE TO SEE DETAILS ON REVENUE SHARING AND THE LUXURY TAX

Revenue Sharing

Revenue sharing was first approved by the owners in 1994 and included in the 1996-2000 Collective Bargaining Agreement, presumably as an alternative to a salary cap, which was ruled out by the MLBPA. Revenue sharing is based on a club’s Net Local Revenue for a given year. Understanding what Net Local Revenue is takes the reading of no less than five definitions in the CBA, but I’m going to provide you the overly simplified version. Net Local Revenue is Local Revenue (gross revenue from all revenue areas like ticket sales, concessions, etc. minus Central Revenue, which is national television and radio, etc.) minus Actual Stadium Expense (which is exactly what it sounds like, the actual monies paid out by a club for its stadium).

The 1996-2000 CBA phased in revenue sharing with the use of three different plans:

Split Pool Plan: each club put in 20% of their Net Local Revenue. Those monies were then divided 75/25, with 75% being split evenly amongst all clubs and 25% being split only between those clubs with a Net Local Revenue below the mean for all clubs. The 25% was not split evenly between those clubs below the mean, but based on their distance from the mean.

Straight Pool Plan: each club put in 39% of their Net Local Revenue and it was split evenly with all clubs.

Hybrid Plan: evaluated the result each club would have under each of the above plans and then assigned the plan that was better for that club as a payor/payee. So, if the Yankees would pay out less under the Split Pool Plan, they were assigned that plan. If the Royals would receive more under the Straight Pool Plan, they were assigned that plan.

Then, to make it even more confusing, the plan was implemented on a percentage basis:

  • 1996: 60% Hybrid Plan
  • 1997: 60% Hybrid Plan
  • 1998: 80% Split Pool Plan
  • 1999: 85% Split Pool Plan
  • 2000: 100% Split Pool Plan

So, in 1996, a club received or paid 60% of the total result under the Hybrid Plan. The result was that $50 million was moved around in 1996. By 2002, that number would be $169 million.

In 2002, revenue sharing was simplified under the next CBA. The Straight Pool Plan was in effect for the length of the CBA at a rate of 34%. So, each club put in 34% of their Net Local Revenue each year, and then the pool was divided evenly between all of the clubs. A Central Fund component was added, which called for 41.066% of the total amount transferred from payor clubs to payee clubs to be pulled from baseball’s Central Fund and divided between payee clubs whose average Net Local Revenue over the past three years fell below the average for all clubs over that same time period. The amount distributed was to be deduced from distributions to be made to payor clubs at the end of the season. There’s a very specific mathematical formula for this in the CBA, but I won’t go into it here.

I know you’ve all heard the grumblings about teams receiving more in revenue sharing than the spend (*cough* Marlins *cough*). An example I use in my lectures is the 2005 Florida Marlins. Payroll was cut by nearly 75% to a league-leading low of $14,998,500, more than $20 million below the next lowest payroll. Meanwhile, their cut of revenue sharing was reported to be $31 million, leaving them $16 million for other “baseball-related” activities. That’s the only parameter given in the CBA for spending revenue sharing dollars, by the way: that it be used for “baseball-related activities.”

The 2006 CBA contained a revenue sharing provision very similar to the 2002 CBA. The percentage was decreased from 34% to 31% because of increased revenues league-wide, but the other provisions remain mostly unchanged.

Time for another example I use in my lectures. The Royals revenue sharing receipts doubled from 2002-2007, but payroll only rose by 6%. Meanwhile, the team value has risen from $96m to $282m. Just food for thought.

Need dessert to go with that? Consider this quote by Mr. Attanasio:

“We do get a piece of revenue sharing, and we appreciate it, and we need it, and we use it. We put it to use. It’s a matter of record that we use our revenue sharing dollars pretty much every year in our budget.”

First off, I’m bothered by the use of “pretty much,” which makes me wonder why not always? Second, when he says it’s a matter of record, don’t be fooled into thinking it’s a matter of public record. It’s not. Every club in MLB guards its numbers very closely, and you will never see the Brewers budget and be able to ascertain for yourself just where that revenue sharing money is going.

As if that weren’t enough, another issue with revenue sharing is the Net Local Revenue calculation, which is easily manipulated. Picture this…Club A’s owner is also the owner of ABC, Corp., which provides concession services. Club A hires ABC, Corp to provide concessions at its ballpark. Club A’s owner overpays ABC, Corp in order to decrease Club A’s Net Local Revenue number, thus increasing Club A’s share of revenue sharing distributions.

Haven’t had enough yet? Another example…Club B’s owner also owns XYZ Media, Inc., which airs Club B’s games locally. Club B negotiates a contract with XYZ Media, Inc. where XYZ Media, Inc. underpays for its contract to air Club B’s games locally, thus lowering its Net Local Revenue number and increasing its share of revenue sharing distributions.

Oh, and if you’re still feeling bad for the Brewers and the other small market teams, consider this: in 2002 three teams were sold and bought. The Red Sox, who are obviously in a large market, sold for $380m (taking on about $40m in debt). The New York Mets, another large market team, sold for $391m. The Marlins, the poster child for small market teams, sold for $158m. Ever heard you get what you pay for?

Luxury Tax

After the infamous strike of 1994, the owners also managed to introduced the luxury tax after being defeated on the salary cap by the MLBPA. Most people think it was aimed directly at Steinbrenner and his seemingly endless wallet, and most people are right.

The only thing the luxury tax has in common with revenue sharing, aside from hitting the Yankees wallet the hardest, is that they made it way too complicated in the 1996 CBA. The luxury tax was only implemented under that CBA for 1997, 1998 and 1999. Thresholds were set and any team who exceed the threshold paid the tax:

  • 1997: $51 million threshold (35% tax on amount over threshold)
  • 1998: $55 million threshold (35% tax on amount over threshold)
  • 1999: $58.9 million threshold (34% tax on amount over threshold)

Simple, right? Yep, so they had to make it a little more complex. Enter the “floating threshold” concept. At the end of each season, if the midpoint between the fifth and sixth highest payrolls was more than the threshold, then that became the new threshold. Then, the threshold for the next year would be adjusted based on that number.

Now even if you can grasp all that, the definition of Actual Club Payroll is sneaking in at stage left to really complicate matters. Actual Club Payroll is 1/28th (there were only 28 clubs then) of player benefit costs, player salaries and other amounts like bonuses and deferred compensation. Throw in that some players are only with the team for part of the year, or have a contract that doesn’t specify amounts for each individual year, and you really have a mess on your hands.

Requests can be made within MLB or by the MLBPA with regards to how the acquisition of a player might affect a club’s payroll total. This was meant to make the luxury tax figure into a club’s decision to sign a player. It was assumed most clubs would try to avoid the penalty. However, the floating threshold concept got in the way in the beginning. The very first year the tax was in effect, 13 clubs were over the midpoint between the fifth and sixth highest payroll and were hit with the tax.

Before I get into how the tax has evolved, I should clarify where the money goes. Under the 1996 CBA, the first $10m went to compensate for any issues with the revenus sharing plan (such as running short under the Hybrid Plan), the next $7m went to the 5 AL clubs and 5 NL clubs with the lowest Local Revenue, the next $3m went to the Industry Growth Fund (which funds training camps and other baseball development activities domestically and internationally), and the next $2.5m went to fund a reserve for any overpayments made into the system. In the end, $30.9m was collected under the 1996 CBA.

The 2002 CBA saw the luxury tax become the competitive balance tax and introduced a somewhat new system. Much higher thresholds were set for 2003-2006:

  • 2003: $117m
  • 2004: $120.5m
  • 2005: $128m
  • 2006: $136.5m

Increasing penalties for repeats offenders was also introduced, making it clear that the tax was meant as a deterrent and a penalty:

  • 2002 First-Time Offenders: 17.5%
  • 2003 First-Time Offenders: 22.5%
  • Second-Time Offenders: 30%
  • Third-Time Offenders: 40%

The distribution of funds also evolved, no longer providing for funding to low revenue clubs, thus distinguishing it entirely from revenue sharing. The first $5m would go to refund for any miscalculaations, then 50% would go to player benefits, 25% to the Industry Growth Fund, and 25% to developing baseball in countries without high school programs.

The 2006 CBA kept the basic model of the 2002 CBA with adjustments for thresholds and taxation amounts:

  • 2007: $148m
  • 2008: $155m
  • 2009: $162m
  • 2010: $170m
  • 2011: $178m

Penalties also increased:

  • First-Time Offenders: 22.5%
  • Second-Time Offenders: 30%
  • Third-Time Offenders: 40%

Distributions remain roughly the same and continued the trend towards fudning player benefits with the tax money. The first $2.5m is set aside for refunds, then 75% for player benefits and 25$ to the Industry Growth Fund. Thus, the tax is not distributed to low revenue clubs.

Now back to the statements by Mr. Lacques and Mr. Marchand. The Yankees have not paid 92% of the total amount of revenue sharing distributed. They have, however, paid 92% of the luxury/competitive balance tax over the years. They are the only club to have paid the tax each and every year since its inception.

If you want to understand more about these provisions and how they evolved, you can check out my article in the University of Denver Sports and Entertainment Law Journal here. I’m also covering all of this in my book, which is coming soon!


Kristi DoshKristi Dosh runs It's a Swing and a Miss, and is both an attorney and a student of the game of baseball.  For the past three years, Kristi has contributed to the Braves blog Chop ‘n Change.  Kristi is also the author of Can Money Still Buy the Postseason in Major League Baseball?: a 10-year retrospective on revenue sharing and the luxury tax, published by the University of Denver Sports & Entertainment Law Review (2007).  Currently, Kristi is working on a book that will expand upon the ideas considered in her previous legal journal article.

Kristi guest lectures on the topics of revenue development, revenue sharing, collective bargaining and various other topics related to administration and economics in Major League Baseball to both undergradute and graduate students on a regular basis.

Kristi holds a Bachelor of Arts in Politics from Oglethorpe University and  Juris Doctor from the University of Florida.  Kristi resides in Atlanta, where she can easily attend Atlanta Braves, Gwinnett Braves and Rome Braves games.  She is on a number of boards, including the Advisory Board for L.E.A.D.,  a revolutionary inner-city baseball program in Atlanta.

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?