zovirax cream online glucophage tabletas 500 mg levitra 20mg jellies buy kamagra soft pattaya viagra buying 2011 100mg cialis dosage diflucan generic online diflucan 150 mg costo toddler prednisone 5mg cialis 5 mg einnahme propranolol 40 mg dosage cheap cialis ed packungsbeilage viagra 100mg 10 mg phenergan orlistat cheap xenical price generic augmentin illegal buy kamagra wellbutrin 450 mg bipolar prednisone 20mg cancer buy nolvadex walgreens clomid 50mg ovulation comprar viagra 100mg thuoc viagra 25mg priligy purchase online generic wellbutrin doses switching synthroid generic prednisone online purchase amoxil 50 mg buying clomid injection get propranolol online buying viagra shanghai propranolol hcl 20mg viagra generic quality dos generic viagra liquid clomid online cheap pills cialis splitting 20mg cialis buy zithromax prescription 80 mg levitra viagra online rischi propecia cheap finasteride amoxil 500 mg toothache levitra 5 mg ausreichend buy nolvadex dropper generic cialis replacement kamagra 25 mg lexapro 15 mg price augmentin tablets 875mg scherzartikel online viagra took 2 5mg cialis bactrim online cheap cipro xl 500 buy viagra online indian buy 50mg clomid xenical 180 mg relsuts buy bactrim cheap strattera cheaper cialis took 40 mg viagra 250 mg obat erythromycin 250 mg buy zithromax tablet buy viagra price metformin buying buy cytotec ireland buy propecia men lexapro 10mg canada lisinopril 10 mg wiki lexapro 5 mg anxiety buy metformin uk cialis 40 mg sublingual cialis 20mg philippines zoloft dose 250 mg order propecia us propecia online hong cialis generico precio nexium esomeprazole 10mg chinese viagra buy will lexapro generic glucophage forte 850 mg viagra online experience nexium 20 mg nedir cheap online kamagra amoxicillin 500mg amoxil 200 mg generic viagra viagra 50mg dose propecia 1mg review buy cialis venezuela buy lisinopril 40 cvs cialis 5mg buy cialis 2.5 mg bfp 100mg clomid celebrex generic dosage Online Levitra 10 pills lasix 500 mg online durata viagra 100mg clomid challenge 50mg zoloft dosage 400 mg clomid 50 mg tabletki Cialis 5 mg Washington cheap tadalafil cialis valtrex 500 mg valor nexium 20mg esomeprazole cost viagra online hydrochlorothiazide online canada generic lexapro better amoxil 500 mg cost prednisone 20 mg prescription priligy generico 30 mg breaking 20 mg cialis cialis online compare pastile cialis 20mg tlilly cialis 100 mg 30 mg propranolol took 3 5mg cialis viagra 25 mg ceny generic celebrex same cheapgeneric cialis uk dosage cipro 500 mg hay viagra generico cialis 40mg overnight viagra online .au prospecto strattera 25 mg existe clomid 100mg safest viagra online augmentin 625mg uk generic viagra onlineusa zithromax 200 mg 5ml buy viagra trusted viagra 10 pills buy 10 mg cialis online generic viagra hypertension buy lasix pills kamagra 100mg chewable lasix furosemide online drug nexium 40mg buy zithromax brand preisvergleich cialis 20 mg 12 buy dapoxetine online cheap viagra pleasure viagra strength mg 600mg viagra order lasix drug erythromycin tablet 500 mg lisinopril 10mg. interactionn diflucan 150 mg precio viagra online pharmacy diflucan 10 mg walmart zoloft dosage 250 mg cipro 250 mg price viagra online toronto levitra 20mg alberta propecia online kopen levitra cheap achat cialis 10mg buying 40mg cialis buy bactrim liquid generic cialis source valtrex online cheap kamagra manchester buy wellbutrin 900 mg buy viagra america prednisone 7 days 20 mgs natural viagra online propranolol mk 40 mg viagra 50 mg posologie augmentin 652 mg glucophage 1000 mg prezzo buy diflucan 150mg synthroid . 2mg lexapro 5 mgs propranolol dosage 40 mg diflucan 150 mg torrino viagra buy brisbane order levitra mastercard recipe viagra online buy viagra sachets starting citalopram 5mg buy viagra chemist red viagra 600mg lexapro generic medications cheap real cialis propecia generic substitute cheap overnight cialis mg of zithromax 200 mg clomid twins valtrex generic cheapest buy viagra without buy lisinopril 40 mg augmentin 200 mg suspension order Cialis 120 prednisone biogaran 20 mg cap augmentin 625mg 1000 mg amoxil doxycycline 75 mg overdose levitra vs generic cialis wirkung 20mg cialis 40mgvs20mg cialis 10mg forum medikament zoloft 50mg acquistare levitra 5 mg priligy comprar online ferrari viagra 150mg lexapro 20 mg canada generic cialis strattera mg available prednisone streuli 50 mg viagra generico vendita cytotec pharmacy online 100 mg viagra cost glucophage generic metformin buy zovirax online cheap cialis 5mg priligy de 30 mg generic viagra egypt cheap nolvadex 20mg propranolol 10 mg migraines 25 mg zoloft pmdd pastillas levitra 10 mg levitra 20 mg treatment buy zoloft online xenical online philippines Levitra 180 pills Buy viagra de 500 mg cheap cialis 10mg generic versus lexapro merrick generic propecia viagra online discount buying cytotec online buy uk metformin order hydrochlorothiazide online lisinopril dosage generic online levitra rx cialis 2.5mg buy levitra 10mg paypal cipro 750 mg filmtabl cialis 10 mg halbieren nexium 40 mg vademecum 500 mg of valtrex buying levitra australia generic wellbutrin image chip cialis 40 mg bactrim forte 160 mg online shop viagra clomid pct 50mg experience buying cialis buy zovirax amoxil 500mg caps buspar mgs levitra 10mg effects lisinopril buyer safe generic viagra preise viagra 50 mg lexapro 20 mg tablets original lexapro online generic lexapro discount prednisone 5mg ndc viagra buy australia prospect viagra 50 mg strattera mail order cipro tabletki 500 mg 100mg viagra cost propecia order finasteride strattera 10 mg wikipedia 10 mg lisinopril cheap lexapro uk 150 mg clomid multiples levitra europe online buy nolvadex safely cialis canadian generic cialis 5 mg ansia viagra doctors online generic zovirax ingredients generic viagra echeck generic cipro hc generic viagra 10mg metformin hexal 500 mg assunzione levitra 5 mg cytotec 200 mg prix ordering propecia overseas cheap rx cialis 40mg of levitra cialis 5mg rezept xenical generic name cialis generic4all augmentin nombre generico online rezept viagra online viagra now nexium 40mg gastrite prednisone pack 5 mg glucophage 1000 mg compresse cipro cheap online zovirax generic price pet doxycycline 100mg cialis generico chile cialis sklep online cialis generico mx viagra buy tablets generic of cipro lexapro 10 mg tablets prednisone 6 day 10mg nolvadex cheap uk generic cipro 600mg zovirax tabletter 800 mg finasteride propecia 5mg viagra 6800mg levitra not generic zoloft order canada generic viagra website 100 mg kamagra tablets zovirax generic uk clomid generic multiples 2013 wellbutrin generic a 101 buy viagra zimbabwe generico do lisinopril lexapro generic launch metformin generic problems black cialis 3000 mg levitra 20mg achat levitra 20 mg viagra 2 25mg of viagra valtrex 500mg dosage viagra droga generica dreampharmaceuticals online wellbutrin cialis soft 100mg drug online viagra strattera 80 mg effects buying cialis manila cipro 250 mg uti propecia cheapest buy cytotec 100 mg viagra order india glucophage 500 mg lisinopril 10 mg safe viagra quebec online diflucan liquid buy lasix generico levitra 40 mg online viagra paypal 100mg generic viagra anygood diflucan generic buy valtrex 1000 mg dreampharmaceuticals diflucan online jual viagra 100 mg starting 20 mg lexapro buspar 10mg reviews generic strattera india doxycycline 50 mgs kamagra online nachnahme buy prednisone 1 mg cheapest viagra 800mg 20mg cialis coupons wellbutrin retard 300 mg viagra london buy viagra online japan erfahrungen online viagra metformin 500 mg 48 93 clomid online sale dosis celebrex 100 mg will levitra generic buy cialis 50mg cipro 250 mg harnwegsinfekt posologia xenical 120 mg cialis medication online 100mg viagra taking 2 cialis online ads levitra 5 mg fiyati viagra price online buy levitra walmart viagra 50mg erfahrung levitra 20mg dosierung buy 1 diflucan pill 30 mg lexapro breastfeeding wellbutrin generic withdrawal cialis 20 mg china cheap levitra 40mg nexium 20 mg tabletten cialis 20 oder 10 mg cipro online purchase cipro order cialis online no order prescription viagra wellbutrin recall generic cheappfizer viagra 100gm viagra 50 mg expiration generico do bactrim zoloft 50 mg erowid cialis 20 mg gebruik strattera generic available viagra buy can generic cialis recommended prednisone 20 mg taper cialis 20mg .at levitra online clomid 50mg generico do lexapro order zovirax cialis pills 5 mg buy lexapro lundbeck online viagra advice viagra generico c50 purchase erythromycin online generic zithromax walmart lexapro 10mg recreationally nexium 40 mg pdf viagra genericssouth africa augmentin suspension 250 mg acheter cialis generic prednisone 20mg image generic lisinopril cheap clomid 50 mg buy valtrex 500 mg generico diflucan 100mg pret lisinopril 10 mg w 929 viagra 50mg indications cheap propecia cost cheap viagra wholesale viagra 50mg cost viagra 100mg color propranolol 40 mg effects generic cialis quality tapering prednisone 50 mg bactrim 480mg cialis de 20 mgr levitra generic us clomid online drugs patente viagra generico prednisone 20mg rash zoloft 100 mg prezzo about doxycycline 100mg cheapviagrageneric viagra metformin overdose mg viagra 50 mg 2 tablet doxycycline accord 100 mg prednisone 5mg chat generic valtrex wiki viagra online sample generic valtrex manufacturer cheap valtrex 1000mg nolvadex buy canada doxycycline dose 100 mg generic propecia finasteride zovirax buy generic buy levitra packs valtrex generic 1000mg tetracycline 500 mg dosage nexium generic image 10 mg cialis dosage levitra 5 mg bayer levitra 20mg kosten mg of wellbutrin hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet cialis cena 20 mg buy wellbutrin canada cialis 10 mg opinioni buy xenical 84 capsules cialis 20 mg interactions buy doxycycline inj. cialis de 5 mgrs synthroid generic cheap cialis web celebrex cheaper alternative buspar overdose mg celebrex dosage 200 mg zoloft 25 mg price viagra mexico generic prospecto cialis 5 mg order cs viagra viagra no.1 200mg lexapro 10mg paxil generic supplements cialis prednisone 60 mg daily prednisone 7.5 mg daily uk propecia cheap lasix 20 mg tabs zoloft mg overdose valtrex prices generic diflucan available generic lexapro 60 mg dose 150mg viagra online ordering lisinopril cialis lady 20mg cialis tabletas 20 mg viagra buying canada propecia 0.25mg kullananlar cialis lilly 5 mg buspar 30 mg reviews generic medication propecia amoxil 250 mg bula buy clomid legit edmonton viagra buy phenergan tabs 25mg zovirax 400 mg bula prednisone 30 mg online cialis 20mg test generic diflucan 150 mg kamagra 50 mg jelly online viagra cheap buy epistane nolvadex metformin 500mg pcos
Home Pete Toms LWIB: Salary Cap in MLB, Reforming the Draft, Biz Tidbits

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 348 guests online

Atom RSS

LWIB: Salary Cap in MLB, Reforming the Draft, Biz Tidbits PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 27
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 01 February 2010 10:21

Last Week in Bizball by Pete Toms

This week in "Last Week in Bizball", is it time for the MLBPA to abandon their long held philosophical opposition to a salary cap?, can reforming the amateur draft result in increased competitive balance? plus a few brief tidbits.

TIME FOR THE MLBPA TO EMBRACE THE SALARY CAP?

One of the most important challenges facing new MLBPA Executive Director Michael Weiner is increasing the amount of MLB revenues being spent on veteran players. “Rookie compensation” is a contentious issue within player ranks in both MLB and the NFL. In both leagues there is a movement amongst veteran players to curtail the escalating compensation being awarded “unproven” rookies (Stephen Strasburg and Matthew Stafford being the most high profile examples) and apportioning those savings to “proven” veterans. MLB veteran players have met with diminished demand for their services in the free agent markets of recent years both in terms of dollars and contract length while competition amongst clubs in the amateur draft and international free agent market has sharply increased. As well, the percentage of industry revenues being paid to MLB players has steadily diminished. The recent agreement amongst the MLBPA, MLB and the Florida Marlins that the Marlins will more closely adhere to the principles of revenue sharing by increasing their big league payroll is probably motivated - in part - by Mr. Weiner’s need to address “rookie compensation”.

LWIB, Buster Olney commented for ESPN on the continuing speculation that the next CBA (the current CBA expires in December of 2011) will address the divisive issue of “rookie compensation”.

And there is a strong belief on the side of management that a slotting system can be completed, because the union will embrace the idea -- so long as the Players Association is guaranteed, in some fashion, that more money will be spent on major league players. How this happens remains to be seen, but there are agents convinced that the interests of the draft-eligible will be swapped out for the interests of the union veterans.

NBC Sports baseball blogger Craig Calcaterra responded with scepticism to Mr. Olney’s comments, wondering if the MLBPA is open to any “capping” (i.e. “slotting”) of compensation;

I was always inclined to believe that too, simply because there were so many veterans on record taking issue with the size of draft bonuses and that it makes sense that they would be willing to negotiate away the rights of amateurs if they got something for themselves. But that changed when Michael Weiner referred to the idea of hard slotting as "a salary cap" in his introductory press conference last month. The term "salary cap" is a rallying cry for the union. Always has been. The owners know this, and they have publicly abandoned any effort to impose one because they know the union will gladly strike over it and will likely win. Again.

But has the MLBPA’s long and steadfast philosophical opposition to any “capping” of player compensation outlived its usefulness? One of the purposes of a salary cap is to limit player compensation but in recent years the players in the only “capless” league - MLB - have come to earn the smallest percentage of league revenues amongst their “big 4” peers. (Arguably so, more on that below) Not coincidentally, the NFL owners appear eager to rid their league of their salary cap as soon as next month, in part due to escalating player compensation. (see The Biz of Football)

The February 2010 edition of the Journal of Sports Economics includes a paper by Andrew Zimbalist entitled, Reflections on Salary Shares and Salary Caps (read the paper here in PDF). The paper examines the many variables in calculating “salary shares” amongst the “big 4”. As Mr. Zimbalist notes, there have been widely divergent media reports on the percentage of MLB revenues earned by the players. The different conclusions can be attributed to different criteria in calculating league revenues and team payrolls. On the revenue side there are widely differing valuations of the “related party transactions” of owners including most significantly in MLB the value of the TV rights “paid” to RSNs owned by the franchises. Similarly, discrepancies in calculating team payrolls arise over whether or not players on the disabled list are included as well as the difference in including or excluding the 15 “reserves” on the 40 man roster (as opposed to solely the active 25 man roster). As well, some calculations include or exclude player benefits and deferred salaries. Nonetheless, Mr. Zimbalist concludes that, “The player share reached a peak of 67% of revenues in 2002, but since has fallen to 51%.” That 51% would place the MLB players at the bottom of their peers in the “big 4” in terms of percentage of earned industry revenues. Mr. Zimbalist goes on to explain that, on average, MLB clubs spend approximately $20 million per season on player development, including an average of $11.5 for the salaries of their minor league players. If those expenditures are included, the percentage of MLB revenues being spent on players increases to 57%, slightly exceeding the percentages in the NHL and NBA. However, Mr. Zimbalist notes that, “…given the higher revenues in MLB, one would expect its share to be above those leagues.” More from Mr. Zimbalist;

The abiding question is why, given the presence of a salary cap system in the NBA, NHL, and NFL and the absence of a cap in MLB, MLB players do not command a higher share of sports revenues. The MLBPA has made a religion of avoiding a salary cap system at all costs and, as a result of this orthodoxy, has endured multiple work stoppages over the years. Has the fight been in vain?

Unfortunately, there are no definitive answers to that question, but the very fact that the question can be asked is of profound interest. After all, if cap and open systems are salary share neutral, but cap systems, as economic theory instructs us under most assumptions, are more likely to promote competitive balance, then cap systems would appear to be a preferred mechanism for optimizing league performance.

Mr. Zimbalist goes on to compare the pros and cons of the NFL “cap” system and the “open” system of MLB. He notes that in the NFL, due to “unequal club revenues” and a concurrent “narrow range” of team payrolls mandated by the salary cap, conflict has arisen amongst owners over “unequal rates of profit across the clubs”. He also speculates on whether the MLBPA erred in not accepting the owners offer in 02 of a minimum team payroll of $40 million and discusses the pitfalls that came with the increased revenue sharing of that same CBA negotiation. Mr. Zimbalist describes a “revenue-sharing welfare system” that has guaranteed profitability for low-revenue franchises choosing to “lowball” team payroll.

Indeed, several teams apparently adopted this strategy and lowered payroll into the $14-$30 million range over the ensuing years. The good news was that this option preserved the profitability and financial strength of low-revenue clubs, the bad news is that it did little to provide ownership incentive to produce a winning team or to promote the desideratum of competitive balance.

Many dispute that there is no salary cap in MLB. Those same people argue that in real terms the Competitive Balance Tax (aka luxury tax, aka Yankee tax) serves as a de facto salary cap for 29 franchises. Amongst those is Shawn Hoffman, who speculated last week in Baseball Prospectus that the MLBPA’s aforementioned success in forcing the Marlins to spend more of their revenue sharing proceeds on their big league payroll marks the introduction of a de facto salary floor in MLB;

The union probably won't stop there. The Pirates are supposedly next, and it's always possible that Weiner will expand the push to include any other team that is spending less than $50 million or $60 million. The short-term goal is pretty clear: if the union can pressure two or three teams to spend an extra $10 million on payroll, that's $20 million or $30 million that's being transferred to the players. But the long-term goal might be even more ambitious: the union could very well be trying to impose a soft payroll minimum, much like the luxury tax serves as a soft maximum.

In a lot of ways, it makes sense: the luxury tax is a real rule with real penalties for teams that spend more than what is deemed socially acceptable by MLB. But there's no similar penalty for teams that spend too little. A tax on payrolls under some very conservative number—much like the luxury tax, which very few non-Yankees teams have reached—seems pretty reasonable, especially if those teams are receiving revenue-sharing dollars and are turning healthy profits.

Increasing the big league payrolls of the franchises at the bottom of the scale would help to satisfy Mr. Weiner’s veteran player constituency but would it also put the small/mid revenue clubs in an even more disadvantaged competitive position? The Pittsburgh Pirates have been very vocal in defending their decision to reduce big league payroll in favour of increasing investments in player development. Again from Mr. Hoffman;

…..teams at the bottom end of the success cycle have no reason to spend on major-league payroll, and in fact it can actually be counterproductive. If the clubs are required to spend a certain percentage of their net revenue-sharing dollars to improve their teams, those other categories—the draft, international free agents, et al—need to be counted.

Concluding the upcoming MLB CBA negotiations will again depend upon finding a suitable compromise between small and large revenue franchises. Increased revenue sharing is not only unpopular with large revenue franchises but the PA as well. The increased revenue sharing and Competitive Balance Tax introduced in the 02 CBA are key factors in the players eroded earned percentage of league revenues. Nobody is predicting that the next round of CBA negotiations will include a work stoppage. The quietly negotiated agreement between the two sides over the Marlins use of revenue sharing proceeds is a recent indicator that labour relations are on solid ground. But the PA might no longer be able to credibly argue with either their membership or management that the introduction of a salary cap in MLB is the worst possible scenario.

Select Read More to see if reforming the draft is key to increased competitive balance, plus other cool biz tidbits from last week

IS REFORMING THE DRAFT THE KEY TO INCREASED COMPETITIVE BALANCE?

LWIB Buster Olney reported for ESPN on some of the particulars of a meeting last month attended by the General Managers, Commissioner Selig, MLB’s senior person on labour matters Rob Manfred and former GM John Schuerholz. Mr. Schuerholz has been assigned by Commissioner Selig to make recommendations on improving the Rule 4 draft (aka “amateur draft). If Mr. Olney’s report is accurate (and it very likely is) the focus of the meeting was on introducing hard slotting and the trading of draft picks to the amateur draft. Whether or not MLB can reach agreement with the MLBPA on these changes - along with expanding the amateur draft to Latin America - remains to be seen. But, assuming that these changes are implemented in the next CBA (the current CBA expires in December 11) will they contribute to increased competitive balance in MLB? Many small/mid revenue franchises are lobbying for slotting and expansion of the draft to Latin America (de facto the Dominican Republic) because they believe a “levelling of the field” in competing for amateur players is key to competing with large revenue franchises capable of outspending them on big league payroll.

LWIB Tom Singer reported for MLB.com on the Reds signing of the much heralded Cuban P Aroldis Chapman. That the small market Reds were the successful bidders in the very competitive bidding for Chapman surprised many. The Reds were not the only small/mid revenue franchise that seriously bid for Chapman. On the Reds’ successful pursuit of Chapman, Mr. Singer reported that, “As confirmed by agent Randy Hendricks, at the end they had to outdraw the A's and one other "sub-.500 club." (likely the Blue Jays) Mr. Singer’s report also notes that last month the small market Royals made a $7 million commitment to another Cuban P, Noelle Arguelles and the small market Twins recently spent $3 million plus on Dominican shortstop Miguel Angel Sano. The large financial commitments being made to international free agents is not limited to small/mid revenue franchises, as demonstrated by the Red Sox $6 million plus commitment made this off season to SS Jose Iglesias, but the trend is clear. More from Mr. Singer’s report;

What teams like the Royals and Reds may lack in resources to compete for the elite on the mainstream free-agent market, they are making up for, this winter in particular, with their ability to adapt, to be resourceful and to invest in the international market of baseball talent.

General manager Walt Jocketty showed his hand after announcing the Reds' Chapman deal: They had little chance of landing such a talent by other means, free agency or Draft, so they had to go all-in on the Cuban kid.

AND

"You have to get your talent somewhere," said Rob Manfred, MLB's executive vice-president of human resources. "We believe focusing on entry-level talent is the best competitive strategy, particularly for smaller-revenue clubs. We think that's a very good thing."

LWIB, Brewers assistant GM (and former Blue Jays GM) Gord Ash made suggestions for improving the amateur draft to Richard Griffin of the Toronto Star.

“Even though the last couple of big international signings have been by smaller-market clubs, traditionally speaking we have not been available to avail ourselves of that level of talent," Ash said. "The Brewers have focused pretty solely on the draft and have done pretty well. We don't even look at Chapman because we can't even go there (financially).

"Some people talk about having a parallel international draft, but then you're creating two No. 1 overall picks and I'm not sure you want to be doing that. The side benefit (with a universal draft) to me is that some of the players that get over-drafted in the U.S. and Canada might go down a little bit.

"By and large, most of the Latin-American guys are moderately priced guys. I don't think that's an issue there….

AND

"Baseball needs to adopt the NHL rule where if you're drafting underage players (high schoolers) you retain the rights," Ash said. "If you're forced into signing them and overpaying because you're trying to buy out colleges you could say, `Look, go to college. We'll keep our eye on you and we'll sign you later.' That has to go hand-in-hand with asking colleges to convert back to wood bats even if MLB has to subsidize it to some degree. It's a much different game with aluminum bats."

Ash also suggests an opt-in registration for players saying that, if drafted, they will sign.

LWIB, Baseball America Executive Editor Jim Callis was asked to comment on MLB’s plans to reform the amateur draft;

I could go off on this subject for hours, but if I were running MLB, I'd lay off the teams in regards to the draft. Right now each team spends about $6 million on the draft, a pittance in a big league budget. The players are severely undervalued compared to what they'd get on an open market, and severely undervalued to what they'll be worth if they become solid big leaguers who are cost-controlled for up to six years. If MLB mandates slotting and/or adds international players to the draft, it won't level the playing field. It will eliminate the opportunity for small-revenue clubs to grab as much talent as they're willing to pay for, which will make it that much tougher to compete because they're not going to be able to sign quality big league free agents. It also will drive more players to other sports and to college baseball.

Perhaps reforming the draft will contribute to increased competitive balance and perhaps it won’t. But the frustrations of small/mid revenue franchises in competing with their large revenue peers is easily understood. Despite record amounts of revenue sharing in MLB ($400-$450 million in 09) and a de facto salary cap (aka the Competitive Balance Tax, aka the Yankee Tax) small/mid revenue franchises and their fans understand that discrepancies in big league payroll most often explain why some win enough to qualify for the playoffs and some don’t. In a guest column earlier this month for the Sports Business Journal, minor league owner and law professor Len Simon wrote;

The data shows that MLB payroll levels separate the contenders from the pretenders. If one looks at 2004-08, and rank-orders the 150 team payrolls (30 teams times five seasons), the following pattern emerges:

  • ŸTop 10 percent of payrolls: make playoffs 80 percent of the time
  • ŸNext 10 percent of payrolls: make playoffs 47 percent of the time
  • ŸNext 30 percent of payrolls: make playoffs 24 percent of the time
  • ŸBottom 50 percent of payrolls: make playoffs 13 percent of the time

Is MLB genuinely interested in promoting competitive balance or is reforming the draft about controlling player development costs? Cynics would point out that MLB’s interest in reforming the draft has arisen in conjunction with the rapidly escalating signing bonuses being awarded to drafted amateurs and international free agents. (While industry revenues roughly doubled over the course of this decade) From Roger Noll, economics professor at Stanford University;

The only way to have equally balanced teams is to ban trades and sales of players and to have periodic drafts of managers, coaches and directors of player personnel. The methods that leagues use to create balance have been shown to have little or no effect on the distribution of quality among teams. The logic behind it is that it is not in the interests of owners as well as players to have balanced competition. If all teams were of the same strength, total league revenues would go up if the best player in KC were traded for the worst player in NYC. In a regime of salary caps and no free agency, the KC owner will be richer if he sells his underpaid star to NY.

SOME BRIEF TIDBITS

LWIB Darren Rovell reported for CNBC that MLB licensee 2K Sports is offering a $1 million prize to the first gamer to pitch a perfect game in their Major League Baseball 2K10 game. Might this promotion be linked to the disappointing results of 2K Sports MLB titles? Last month, Eric Fisher reported for the SportsBusiness Journal;

Take-Two Interactive, parent of 2K Sports and one of the video game industry’s most prominent producers of licensed sports video games, picked a rather routine forum to deliver some startling news. During a conference call early last month with financial analysts, company management warned it would report worse-than-expected quarterly results due to “several factors, the largest being the performance of its Major League Baseball titles in the fourth quarter.”

Two weeks later, when Take-Two indeed reported a quarterly loss of $22 million, the grim outlook for its MLB games continued, with the company projecting a fiscal loss of at least $30 million in 2010 solely from its licensed baseball titles.

2K’s licensing agreement with MLB and the MLBPA expires after the 2012 season. In particular this might be of concern to the PA which already saw their licensing fees greatly negatively impacted by their loss in the “CDM Fantasy Sports” case.

Michael Hiestand reported for USA Today that Fox is in discussions with MLB to move 2 “Saturday afternoon” games into prime-time this season. The Sports Media Watch blog followed up on Mr. Hiestand’s report;

Coming off of a third-straight season of record low regular season ratings, FOX is looking to move two MLB telecasts into primetime this season.
A FOX spokesman told USA Today that the network is looking into moving two regular season telecasts to primetime during the 2010 season. One primetime telecast would take place in May, with the other one airing in June.

FOX has only aired two primetime regular season games since acquiring MLB rights in '96 -- Cubs/Cardinals in September '98 (when admitted steroid user Mark McGwire hit his then-record 62nd home run of the season), and Yankees/Red Sox in April '04 (months after the teams' 7-game clash in the ALCS).

Not surprisingly, the same blog later reported that both those games would include the Yankees.

Eric Fisher reported last week in the Sports Business Journal that the Sun Life naming rights deal for “Dolphins Stadium” included an MLB connection. Fenway Sports Group put the deal together, the first naming rights deal concluded by the agency. Dolphins CEO Mike Dee formerly headed FSG.


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?