prospect valtrex 500mg review cialis 60mg lisinopril 10 mg info doxycycline 100 mg vidal propranolol retard 40 mg nolvadex 10 mg tab buy viagra orlando hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg pill cheapest 800mg cialis generic synthroid medication bactrim de 400 mg buy 2 gram zithromax buy diflucan express buy synthroid 100 mcg levitra 10mg information clomid cyprus 50mg 2mg of propecia generic 100 mg viagra cialis black cheapest clomid 100mg days 2 7 sandoz metformin 850 mg viagra 25mg prodaja synthroid 0.025mg co durata cialis 10 mg 100 mg viagra orgasm propecia nz buy lasix drip order generic metformin 500 mg korea viagra online overseas generic viagra wholesale kamagra 100mg cialis online legal doxycycline 100mg effects viagra mg 100 cialis 3600 mg 50mg zoloft anxiety cialis bayer 20mg generic wellbutrin odor clomid 150mg follistim order viagra paypal generico levitra farmacias doxycycline 50 mg wikipedia 50mg clomid failed prednisone 10mg arthritis cialis 100mg. online generic viagra manufacturer online clinic viagra Online Levitra 20 mg dosage phenergan 25mg 200mg zoloft day clomid mg ml cialis online legale nexium online kopen buy levitra noida buy doxycycline hyc walmart viagra 50mg 90 mg prednisone shot valtrex dosage 500 mg componentes nexium 40 mg 600 mg wellbutrin overdose harga cialis 10mg propranolol dosage 80 mg buy viagra capsules metformin xr generic viagra online dublin viagra online discoun viagra cheap discount propranolol 2.5mg valtrex there generic inhaltsstoffe cialis 20mg generic levitra target nexium 40 mg wikipedia levitra 20 mg costo clomid 75mg twins 5 m mg cialis cheap levitra overnight generic levitra store nolvadex generic names kamagra cheap uk buy propecia winnipeg glucophage online pharmacy order Cialis Jelly 90 viagra 25 mg generic lasix vs generic cheapest viagra real lasix 20 mg pills lisinopril 20 mg alcohol cheap cialis 5 mg viagra 100mg preisvergleich very cheap cialis generic nexium name lasix prolongatum 30 mg buy 1 gram zithromax 2 original cialis 20mg 60 mg of nexium buy lisinopril diflucan generic prednisone dosage 2.5 mg medicamento nexium 40mg cialis 2.5 mg generic 180 mg strattera prednisone 80 mgs buy viagra phitzer cialis australia online levitra 20mg preisvergleich viagra online coupon nexium drug generic xenical tem generico online viagra levitra zoloft 25 mg tabs buying viagra nyc zithromax 9 pills 1000mg taking 2 10mg lexapro metformin 425 mg non generic viagra buy propecia coupon metformin bluefish 1000 mg clomid pharmacology online tetracycline capsule 500mg online cialis sale viagra usa buy harga cialis 800 mg clomid malaysia online cialisgeneric cialis c ordering prednisone canada cialis 20 mg safe online propecia buy twins 25 mg clomid buy cipro online zithromax sirop 300 mg cialis online au Levitra 10 pills order nolvadex online buy clomid 25mg eod 12.5 mg lexapro viagra marke 100mg lisinopril 2.5 mg effects xenical buy london buy doxycycline 50 generic actoplus metformin xenical generico brasil cialis generico seguro viagra precio generico buying levitra in propranolol 80 mg tablets metformin xl generic kamagra buyers clomid men buy celebrex 200 mg generic levitra 10mg buy co metformin 500 mg diflucan 200 mg yeast celebrex 200mg pharmacia buy bactrim forum lasix 40 mg indication cialis online articles kamagra 100mg ervaringen cialis generico vademecum levitra pills cheap cialis 20mg achat order viagra america tab glucophage 500mg cialis 20mg malaysia 2013 priligy 30 mg ecuador cheaper than lexapro cialis medistar 20 mg metformin 500 mg rebajar new cialis 500mg posologia lasix 25 mg nexium esomeprazole 40mg 350 mg wellbutrin cialis 5mgsouth africawholesale kamagra 100mg erfahrungsbericht doxycycline buy price online purchase viagra buy viagra mg cialis 2 5 e 5 mg diflucan 150 mg composizione metformin arrow 500 mg 5mg lexapro work take 2 levitra 10mg mejor generico viagra buy propecia finasteride prednisone 50 mg 7 days cialis generic softabs to buy zithromax strattera generic 25 mg clomid 50mg turkce cialis 5 mg torrinomedica viagra generic ph 5mg levitra online metformin ksk 850 mg buy viagra bradford buy viagra generic levitra used lisinopril online prescription viagra buy oonline walmart 5mg cialis wellbutrin generic compare order Cialis Tabs cheap propecia tablets propranolol 80mg buy lexapro mastercard doxycycline dosage 40 mg generic viagra pill cialis hungary buy order synthroid canada buy levitra mg kebaikan cialis 20 mg q online cialis cialis online 5mg 5 mg cialis india generic viagra line cialis 10mg bih glucophage price 500 mg philippines buy propecia cialis 1800 mg cheap generic zithromax 4 days 10 mg prednisone buy strattera adderall cialis 20mg order lisinopril 20 mg bioequivalence online cialis complaints cialis 10mg 20mg preisvergleich viagra 50 mg valtrex 500 mg generico levitra 20 mg bayer 20 mg viagra capsules strattera 10 mg nonstimulant lexapro withdrawal 40 mg phifer viagra online cialis 2.5 mg times viagra bali buy medicine prednisone 20 mg cheapest reputable viagra notice cialis 10 mg generic periactin cyproheptadine guaranteed cheapest kamagra cheapest 100 levitra uk lexapro at 40 mg comprar cialis 20 generico discount prednisone 60mg viagra buy phuket lisinopril 2.5mg tablets cialis buy review propranolol 40 mg information .5 mg propecia results 20 cialis mg tadalafil cheap online viagra prednisone taper 20 mg 1oo mg clomid lexapro gotas 10mg cialis available generic generic brand valtrex augmentin 500 mg generic generic levitra mexico xenical generico bogota 50 or 100 mg clomid cialis 20mg half generic cialis talafadil amoxil 250 mg image generic viagra round lexapro 10 mg presentacion online eczane levitra generic shop kamagra zithromax 600 mg 5 day diflucan online prescription propranolol gador 80 mg buy nexium generic metformin dosage 1500 mg cialis 20mg avis cialis 5 mg precio hydrochlorothiazide lisinopril 25 mg cialis andorra online celebrex 200 mg dose order lexapro tablets 10mg cialis effect celexa citalopram 20mg viagra 100mg fta 12 cheap cytotec philippines amoxil 250 mg suspension generic wellbutrin manufacturers metformin ranbaxy 850 mg viagra online sales cialis 5mg ndc cialis 20mg cheap 50 mg phenergan safe cheapest 150 ml viagra cialis 5 mg enough lasix ret. 60 mg mg in viagra 600 mg cytotec viagra buy china cialis online meds lisinopril online generic bactrim 960 mg cialis tadalafil 5mg valtrex cheapest cialis online cheapest buy viagra vegas viagra onlinesouth africa cialis 5 mg kuwait have 5 mg cialis buy zithromax 250 buy zithromax 500mg Cialis 5 mg 120 Tabs viagra softtabs online myla lisinopril 2.5 mg cutting cialis 20 mg price viagra generic lasix 40 mg. amp pfizer cialis online lisinopril 20 mg online doxycycline 100 mg vartojimas good cheap viagra clomid success buy generic xenical uk viagra online 50mg bactrim 200 40 mg suspansiyon clomid cheap ed cheap viagra viagra 150mg safe 20 celexa citalopram mg cialis 80 mg bali cialis 5mg medstore lexapro generic march cipro hc generic 50mg equivalent viagra xenical online discount medicament prednisone 20 mg order cipro but viagra online doxycycline 300 mg dogs taking cialis 30 mg nexium 40 mg overdose order bactrim levitra generic forum cialis 20 mg medicamento walmart buy viagra order periactin canada bactrim online coupons cialis 20 mg cheap cialis warwickshire nexium generic europe lisinopril 20 mg bijwerkingen cialis 10mg forums doxycycline 200 mg alcohol viagra blue 100 generic zithromax online chlamydia comprare xenical online augmentin bid 875 125 mg about clomid 75mg lasix retard 60 mg cutting cialis 20mg generic valtrex reviews buspar 20mg metformin hcl 1000mg 5 mg. cialis discounts cipro online sale mg of prednisone viagra 100mg online buy cialis tijuana 20 mg. cialis buy 36 hour cialis medicamento amoxil 500 mg cheep viagra 120 mg levitra 5mg purchase celebrex 200mg anwendung welt online viagra generic priligy 30mg amoxil 250 mg dosage 37.5 mg of zoloft generic priligy 90mg levitra 10 mg uso viagra 50 y 100 mg 5mg cialis canada lasix 40mg emagrece strattera 25 mg generic order cipro uk online levitra uk cheap viagra substitute 10mg levitra sirup zithromax 600 mg buying erythromycin online viagra generic march 2012 clomid 100 mg twins nebenwirkungen metformin 500 mg metformin 1000 mg day buy diflucan now prijs levitra 20 mg buy 50mg kamagra cialis order rx cialis adderall online viagra sildenafil 100 mg cialis 5 mg statins generic lexapro mylan cheap order viagra generico viagra 100mg pret augmentin 1000 mg levitra generic articles cheap kamagra london cialis 100mg japan xenical capsulas 120 mg propecia 0.25mg effective viagra 50mg verses Online Levitra 120 pills 20 mg levitra prices were buy priligy propecia online 1.25 mg augmentin suspensie 600 mg cialis pricing 20mg 400 mg doxycycline acne lexapro 10 mg 14 comprimidos viagra dosis 25 mg lexapro 10 mg pregnancy cheapest viagra 150mg lisinopril splitting 2.5mg propecia online store 40 mg strattera kamagra 25 mg tablet bactrim de 400mg order cialis 20 mg lexapro when generic generic lexapro headaches brand cialis online zoloft 50mg kaina manfaat diflucan 150 mg erythromycin syrup 125mg cheapest valtrex prices doxycycline monohydrate 100mg levitra 20 mg. orosolubile cialis buy e20 viagra online bulgaria buy kamagra gold sildenafil generic viagra zovirax tablet 400mg online viagra poland cheap propecia reviews tra 150 mg viagra propranolol 80 mg overdose 800 mg chinese viagra generic lavitravs levitra cialis 5 mg kosten 100mg clomid statistics aventis phenergan 25 mg cytotec de 5 mg prezzo nexium 40 mg dosage generic viagra propranolol 20 mg tab cialis economico online generic propecia price 5 propranolol tablets 10 mg 500mg valtrex dosage hypothyroidism generic synthroid levitra nombre generico fass cialis 5mg 80 mg strattera price celebrex generic meloxicam erythromycin 400 mg dosage buy viagra 2.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg identification propecia ie buy glucophage 500 mg nebenwirkungen cytotec 200mg cena buy viagra safe lasix retard 30 mg 20 mg lexapro reviews viagra online lloyds buy viagra nj bactrim forte generic cialis thailand online priligy 60 mg preisvergleich generic viagra legal bijsluiter xenical 120 mg periactin 4 mg amoxil 1000mg metformin sr 500 mg levitra 10mg kosten buy viagra italy xenical 120 mg zusammensetzung viagra 50 mg kopen viagra buy japan ranbaxy viagra 50 mg kamagra online shopping harga metformin 500 mg generic propecia thailand thuoc zoloft 100mg viagra online masterrcard clomid online order cialis generic brands order cialis fedex buy nolvadex powder viagra generico 2013 woman generic viagra 2.5 mg cialis effect lisinopril 40 mg tremors propecia generic fda cialis 20mg order order cheap valtrex pro cialis 20 mg
Home Pete Toms MLB Network Vs. Other League Networks

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 544 guests online

Atom RSS

MLB Network Vs. Other League Networks PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 24
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Friday, 04 December 2009 12:36

MLB NetworkOn January 1st of this year, MLB became the last of the “Big 4” to launch their own TV channel with the debut of MLB Network (MLBN). The initial year of MLBN has been deemed a success by MLB officials. The channel debuted in 50 million plus homes (a record launch for a cable channel), ad revenues were reportedly strong (given the recession) and the programming received positive reviews (the addition of Bob Costas gave the channel’s journalistic credibility a major boost).

But what is the future of league owned networks? MLB’s rights deals with all three of their national TV partners (Fox, TBS and ESPN) expire in 2013. Those deals pay MLB upwards of $650 million per year. All of the “big 4” (most notably MLB and the NFL) must balance the enormous value of their national TV deals against the challenge of growing the revenues of their own channels. In a nutshell, the leagues have become competitors with their broadcast partners. Neal Pilson, former president of CBS Sports, was quoted in a recent Los Angeles Times piece by Jon Weinbach titled, “Sports league cable networks play a dangerous game”, (Leagues) "have to be aware of -- and careful not to kill -- their golden goose, What is the endgame?" In a March 2008 Q&A with The SportsBusiness Journal, Fox Sports Chairman David Hill addressed the relationship between league owned networks and their broadcast partners:

Do you see any new models in terms of how networks deal with the leagues beyond right fees?
Hill: Who knows? The modeling might change. The modeling might remain the same. I don’t know. But it’s going to be a sad day for the leagues if the current model disappears. It would require a lot of late nights on Park Avenue, with the lights burning to try and figure out what their economic structure looks like without the networks.

So then why are leagues launching NFL Network and MLB Channel to compete with you?
Hill: What’s the financial viability of the NFL Network? Do you think the NFL is going to say to the networks, “See you later. We’re going to go make our money off of the NFL Network”?

If we’re talking about 20 years, yeah, I can see that as an end goal.
Hill: It could well be in 20 years, but certainly not in the next decade. Same thing with MLB Network. Talk to David Stern. He’s had NBA Network going for what, 15 years now?

In the present, how important are these league owned cable channels? There are approximately 115 million TV households in the US. MLBN and NFL Network (easily the most widely distributed of the “big 4” channels) are available in approximately 53 million of those homes. The NFL Network launched in 2003 and only this season achieved the same level of distribution as MLBN. (more on that below) By comparison, ESPN is available in approximately 99 million homes.  Last month, The SportsBusiness Journal quoted Comcast Programming Group President Jeff Shell, “The amount of money each of the leagues is making from their network is de minimis compared to the amount of money we’re all paying for rights,…” Jon Weinbach reported in his aforementioned piece, “Networks with fewer than 70 million subscribers are generally not considered "national buys" by advertising agencies, and therefore can't generate premium rates for commercials.”

If the league owned cable channels are relatively minor players today, is that set to change in the near future? There has been much speculation that the “big 4” are concerned about the increasing dominance of ESPN in the sports TV marketplace and that the league owned channels are necessary to protect the future value of broadcast rights. Over the air broadcasters have concluded that their “ad based” model can no longer compete with the “dual revenue” (ads and carriage fees) model of cable TV. As a result, the over the air broadcasters are negotiating with cable operators over compensation for the “retransmission rights” to their local stations. In some markets, broadcasters have even threatened to “pull“ their local stations from the cable operator over “retransmission fees”. ESPN receives a monthly subscriber fee from cable operators and sat providers of upwards of $4. That before they sell a single ad. John Ourand reported last month in The Sports Business Journal:

The debate over retransmission rights — where broadcasters want cable operators to pay cash to carry their local stations — will be one of the most closely watched issues over the next year, as the two sides try to determine how high the monthly “retrans fee” should be

It’s not a stretch to suggest that the long-term future of broadcast networks as pivotal players in televised sports is at stake. If broadcasters somehow don’t add dollars to their coffers, the likelihood of big payouts during the next round of major sports TV negotiations from 2011 to 2013, which include the NFL, MLB and NHL, seems remote.

Tom Van Riper reported last month for Forbes:

The most obvious advantage to starting your own programming arm: controlling the pipeline through which your product goes out. Baseball's rights deals with ESPN and Fox both expire after the 2013 season. With new agreements to be negotiated, what's better leverage than having the option to tell a potential network partner that you can put the games on the air yourself if the price isn't right?

"You want to become a content provider, because you never know what the future holds," says Lee Berke, a New York-based sports media consultant.

Last month, John Ourand and Tripp Mickle of The SportsBusiness Journal filed a report titled Are leagues only potential ESPN rival?”from the Sports Media & Technology conference.

The sports industry continues to look for a competitor to step up and compete with ESPN, and the consensus at an industry conference last week is that only one group is poised to pose an actual threat to the sports media giant: the leagues.

The majority of attendees at last week’s conference said they believed league-owned networks were most likely to compete with ESPN.

In the same report, Dick Ebersol, Chairman NBC Sports & Olympics, remarked on the “dual revenue” advantage that ESPN has over the over the air broadcasters:

“No one in the history of media has ever opened up the new year every year knowing they have $5 billion sitting over there on the side of the room,” he said. “So anything ESPN wants, ESPN can have. Now whether that’s healthy in the long run for every sports property in America, you decide — because at a certain point in time, all of us will be out of business, and then they’ll only be there to deal with everybody, and I don’t believe the goodness of their heart is better than the goodness of anyone’s heart in this room in a situation like that.”

No doubt the “Big 4” are extremely happy about the merger of the nation’s largest cable provider Comcast with NBC Universal. Long rumoured, the deal has the potential to turn Comcast’s sports channel “Versus” into a worthy rival to ESPN. (see The Biz of Hockey report, NBCU & VERSUS: An Alternative to ESPN?) Although regulatory approval of the merger is expected to take at least a year and likely more, the impact on the sports broadcast industry is potentially huge. Earlier this week Richard Sandomir reported in The New York Times:

Comcast would have to decide to spend what is necessary to lure viewers from ESPN and ESPN2 by acquiring bigger events, like the Olympics, Major League Baseball, the N.F.L., Nascar and the N.B.A. — properties on a tier above its current rights to IndyCar, the Professional Bull Riders, Mountain West Conference football and mixed martial arts.

AND

So, if Comcast is serious financially and qualitatively, it and NBC could turn Versus into a credible rival. It could turn Versus into a network that would provide cable operators (like Comcast) leverage in negotiations with ESPN.

It might also make leagues giddy, knowing they could potentially juggle large-scale bids from Versus.

“You can see that the leagues must be concerned about the next round of negotiations,” said Randy Falco, the former president of the NBC Universal Television Group. “They’re asking, ‘Where’s the money coming from?’ Less and less over the next 10 years will it come from the broadcast networks, so they’re looking for an alternative.”

In the immediate future, the league owned cable channels will attempt to add subscribers, which in turn boosts ad revenues. Adding subscribers has proven a difficult challenge for the league owned channels. Cable operators have been pushing back against the rising cost of sports programming with lengthy battles ensuing over the relegation of sports channels to “sports tiers” as opposed to the more deeply penetrated “basic tiers”. The NFL and MLB have opted for different approaches in their negotiations with cable and sat providers.

As previously noted, NFL Network only reached the same level of distribution as MLBN this season, despite launching six years earlier. Despite the relatively minor availability of the channel, in 2006 the NFL gave their network the sole right to broadcast 8 regular season games. (Played on a Thursday or Saturday) The league reportedly rejected a $400 million plus offer from Comcast for the 8 game package, convinced that demand for the games would incite fans to pressure their cable providers to add NFL Network to their line ups. Comcast (the nation’s largest cable provider) responded by moving the channel to a more expensive and less penetrated “tier”. A court battle and bitter public relations campaign ensued until this season when the two sides came to an agreement. A resolution was reached as a result of the NFL lowering their carriage fee for the channel and the launch of the NFL’s RedZone channel, a companion “Sunday look in” product tailored to the “fantasy” fan. Cable operators had long argued that DirecTV had an unfair advantage in programming the NFL as the exclusive provider of “Sunday Ticket”, long a hit with “fantasy” fans. The new agreement has resulted in an additional 11 million subscribers for NFL Network, 53 million as opposed to 42 million last season.

Select Read More to see why MLB Network's model has been a success compared to other league-owned networks

MLB was able to launch MLBN in 53 million homes because they made many of the biggest cable and sat providers partners in the channel. The cable operators are obviously more motivated to program MLBN on their most popular services if they own a stake in the channel. (The NFL long argued that Comcast gave preferential treatment to sports channels that they own. I.E. The Golf Channel) MLB also made their popular out of market “Extra Innings” package available to their MLBN partners. (similar to the NFL’s recent introduction of “RedZone”) Last month, Stuart Miller reported for Multichannel News:

MLB Network, the latest entrant among the bunch, took a distinctive path to gaining distribution, selling minority ownership stakes to some of the biggest players in the game: Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications and DirecTV. Thanks to this tactic, the big leagues' network launched last January in a record 53 million homes — roughly half the TV universe. (The network also tied carriage to its out-of-market “MLB Extra Innings” package.)

“We feel really good about where we are,” said network president Tony Petitti, who credits MLB's executive vice president of business, Tim Brosnan, with the plan.

That's because in one year, MLB caught up to NFL Network, also in 53 million homes, even though the gridiron channel has been around since 2003.

Lee Berke, a sports media consultant, spoke with Tom Van Riper for the aforementioned Forbes report:

He likes MLB Network's strategy of avoiding its cable carriers' premium tiers, going for wide distribution over greater revenue per subscriber. The network debuted to a potential audience of 50 million homes in January 2009, many more than its NFL and NBA counterparts……

"A subscription service that gets $5 or $10 a channel might get only 10 million homes," says Berke. "Better to be in 50 million homes, that's how you maximize affiliate [advertising] revenue." Advertisers like predictability--knowing roughly how many viewers comprise the audience. Staying off premium channels greatly reduces the audience churn rate: People come and go from premium services all the time, while most everyone sticks with the basic services.

In fairness to the NFL, which has been widely criticized in the sports media for mishandling negotiations with the cable and sat industry over distribution of their channel, they are now in the same number of homes as MLBN. But, NFL Network charges double the carriage fee of MLBN (reportedly approx. $0.50 per sub compared to approx. $0.24 per sub) and they have not given up 1/3 of the equity in their channel to cable and satellite.

Ultimately, the league owned channels best opportunity to increase subscribers lies in increasing the number of live games they broadcast. MLBN has plans to broadcast more live games next season. Whether or not the leagues are cannibalizing the existing value of this programming to RSNs and national TV partners is a matter of debate. From Jon Weinbach’s aforementioned piece in the Los Angeles Times:

"League offices have an unhealthy belief that viewers, consumers and distributors want more of their product," said one veteran cable executive, who declined to be identified because his network is in business with all of the leagues. It’s going to be interesting to see over time how they manage that contradiction and how they manage a fair bidding process when the auctioneer is one of the bidders.”

Tim Brosnan, MLB’s Executive Vice President, Business commented last month in the SportsBusiness Journal on the subject of programming more live games on MLBN (Mr. Brosnan is credited with leading MLB’s successful negotiations with cable and sat during the MLBN launch):

MLB executives are quick to acknowledge the power of live MLB games as the surest way to expand the network. Last season, the MLB Network carried more than 50 live MLB games.

“We know from the cable networks and the broadcast networks in the sports business, it’s live events that really draw the customers in,” Brosnan said. “You can make a lot of money on syndicated shows and talk and highlights. But you draw bigger audiences on events.”

Still, Brosnan said MLB is not close to making a decision on whether to add to the channel’s live game schedule when the league’s TV contracts with ESPN, Fox and TBS end in 2013. “The biggest decisions that are going to have to be made in our industry as it relates to MLB Network is the depth and level of events that we put on our air,” he said.

Beyond building equity and reaping operating profits from these channels, there are ancillary benefits for the leagues. MLB uses MLBN to promote the WBC and the amateur draft (MLB has long sought the media attention that the drafts in the other “stick and ball” leagues generate). The NFL Network has generated significant interest in broadcasting the “scouting combine”, which ties in with promotion of the already wildly popular NFL draft.

If there is concern amongst distributors, programmers, leagues and fans that there is too much sports on television, it might be premature. Yes, the recession might be keeping more fans in front of their sets but the TV audience numbers for NFL games this season are still astounding. Yes, the Yankees were in the World Series for the first time since 2003 and there were many thrilling postseason contests but still, the TV audience numbers for the MLB playoffs were enormous. A lacklustre MLB regular season (lack of compelling playoff races), resulted in diminished ratings for FOX and ESPN while TBS ratings were stable. Perhaps more importantly, RSN ratings for regular season baseball were stable (albeit interpretation of those numbers on a macro level are made more difficult because ratings are directly tied to team performance). Going forward, whether or not broadcast networks remain a major player in TV sports, or whether or not Versus steps up to increase demand for sports programming, or whether or not the league owned networks become increasingly important, remains to be seen. What we do know is that in this era of audience fragmentation, DVRs, video games, internet and social networking, live sports remains one of the last (THE last?) media properties capable of delivering a mass audience. The last word from the aforementioned report from Multichannel News:

Most sports attract loyal viewers, mostly men in crucial demographics, and have the potential to draw big TV crowds. Live professional sports programming, especially in high definition, is the ultimate penetration driver, said Tennis Channel CEO Ken Solomon.

“It's the one thing in television that continues to defy ratings gravity,” he said.


OTHER NEWS FROM THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK

(THE BIZ OF FOOTBALL)

(THE BIZ OF HOCKEY)

(THE BIZ OF BASKETBALL)

(SPORTS BASH)


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?