50 mg zoloft tired switching synthroid generic buy levitra packs price generic augmentin celebrex 400 mg price 500 mg of valtrex viagra comprar generico propecia 1mg 84 zoloft order canada buy cialis florida mastercard buy cialis order zovirax ointment cialis online advantages took 2 5mg cialis prednisone pack 5 mg augmentin 875 mg bid tetracycline 250 mg shortage generics biz viagra doxycycline hyclate backorder korea generic viagra buy zeneca nolvadex Levitra 10mg online cialis 20mg mexique viagra 50 or 100mg generic cialis 5mg metformin aurus 1000mg is levitra generic buy viagra costume genericviagra dapoxetine lexapro 10mg c 14 propecia generic substitute cialis costs 5mg cialis order generic zovirax buy generic viagra price 100 mg authentic levitra online clomid 50 mg buy composition augmentin 500 mg nexium buy phenergan 25 mg injection 100mg cialis dose augmentin 375 mg filmtabletta thuoc viagra 25mg nexium 40 mg patent abra viagra online lexapro generic options strattera generic online clomid online without cialis 50mg 100mg propranolol 10 mg bijsluiter cialis 5mg perth 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride 50mg zoloft breastfeeding nexium 150 mg online cialis canadian generic xenical australia doxycycline vet buy new generic cialis lexapro 10 mg wiki esidrex 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide hydrochlorothiazide pms 12.5 mg viagra 100mg buying bactrim ds 100 mg cialis 50mg order viagra gel cheapest celebrex generic name pfizer viagra online 1cheap generic cialis cheapest kamagra jellies phenergan 25mg cmi buy clomid mexico cialis 50 mg review viagra 50 mg cheap buy nexium pharmacy indonesia cialis online buy nolvadex online 2011 generic wellbutrin image true generic cialis valtrex generic valacyclovir doxycycline 20mg generic buy zithromax europe cialis generic 60 mil generic zoloft 100 mg zovirax generic uk cialis 10mg dose viagra generic eu doxycycline 100mg coupon generic lexapro comparison cheapest soft viagra fsa online viagra cipla generic valtrex online viagra paypall nexium generic name prednisone 10mg 5442 buy powder zithromax kl buy viagra cialis 5 mg ervaringen montreal viagra online recipe viagra online odt levitra generics cialis 20 mg doctissimo safest online cialis propecia il generico consiglio viagra online viagra online secure sandoz metformin 500 mg 150 mg zoloft withdrawal nolvadex gymgrossisten synthroid 75mg drug prednisone 20 mg generic med synthroid kamagra 50 mg jelly 2013 cpt zithromax 250mg their generic propecia viagra generico brasil celebrex cheapest purchase periactin online viagra generic long erythromycin generic name cipro buy viagra online toronto celebrex 30mg metformin 750 mg zithromax generic online nexium 10mg packet about zoloft 50mg online viagra 25 mg farmaco diflucan 150 mg strattera 30mg propranolol 10 mg migraines lasix 20mg iv lisinopril generic name xenical 120 mg fiyat buy zovirax cvs xenical 150 mg pret cialis 10mg erfahrungen thuoc erythromycin 250mg buy viagra 50 mg augmentin order online lexapro 10mg sleep xenical 120 mg yorumlar buy propecia fsa cialis generico 50 mg prednisone 20 mg teva buy zovirax 600mg cheap kamagra fast zithromax 200 mg dosage priligy 30 mg synthroid 0.2 mg brazilian generic viagra doxycycline online australia taking 5mg cialis diflucan 150 mg tablet viagra gold 300 mg generic lasix 500 mg mexican cialis online xenical 120 mg preis nexium 10 mg colombia cialis 5mg coupons many mg xenical 10mg lexapro heart generic synthroid issues cialis 20mg malaysia lasix 50 mg dogs cialis 10mg forum pet doxycycline 100mg propecia online apotheke generic line viagra cialis dosage 30 mg augmentin generic price metformin 500 mg adalah buy cialis tube generic cialis review metformin al 500 mg viagra and 500mg buy propecia tokyo buy lexapro fast buy levitra free generic 500mg viagra viagra online shops generic viagra means viagra 100mg nl chlamydia zithromax 1000 mg nexium 20 mg contraindicaciones lasix 20 mg diuretico online genuine viagra 150mg generic viagra sordera por viagra prednisone mood disorder metformin 500 mg 48 93 buy nolvadex walgreens cialis 50mg australia cialis generico mx doxycycline 100mg hk viagra buying limit buy propecia belgium viagra generic ingredients prednisone ten mg took 40 mg cialis black cialis 200 mg augmentin xr 1 mg 62.5 two 10mg lexapro ert generic viagra xenical 120 mg 84 cap doxycycline buy australia generico viagra brasil days doxycycline 500mg cialis 5 mg mutuabile amoxil 500 mg cost bula propranolol 40mg tadalafil 5 mg cialis cialis 10 mg precios 20mg cialis experience viagra 50mg cheap viagra adelaide clomid 50mg conceiving propranolol anxiety 40 mg cialis online germania propecia 1 mg price cialis generico precio cheap viagra tomorrow dapoxetine priligy buy cialis medication online lexapro 20 mg tabs cipro buy online wellbutrin generic xl cialis 5mg last generic buspar cost 1 mg propecia uk zithromax 250 mg filmtabletten generic viagra spain dangers generic cialis lasix 500buy 10mg propranolol anxiety nexium 40mg argentina levitra 20 mg tabletten mg of zoloft lexapro 10 mg vademecum xenical 120mg delhi synthroid . 2mg viagra xplode 100mg propranolol 10 mg dawkowanie viagra cheap express buy lasix injections glucophage taste disorder cialis 100 mg 10 tablett buy zovirax kamagra postorder prednisone 4 mg kg nexium 40 mg flk cialis generico azul viagra online discount kamagra online prodaja cheap uk levitra kegunaan zithromax 500mg levitra 10 mg medicine paypal generic viagra clomid injections online prednisone 120 mg daily generic 80 mg lasix wellbutrin generic availability online store xenical propranolol 60 mg la generic zithromax uk cialis europe cheap cvs viagra online apo propranolol 20 mg achat clomid 50mg buy glucophage 500mg propecia online au metformin 500 mg abnehmen generic viagra work lisinopril 5 mg images buy doxycycline 100 online propranolol eel 40 mg buy doxycycline 40mg cialis 200mg reviews mexico viagra generic finasteride propecia 5mg cost cialis 5mg propecia cheap buy valtrex generic online manfaat cialis 80mg cialis and andromgel kamagra online kopen buy lasix mumbai viagra mexico generic cialis 20 mg distributor cialis dosage 40 mg 200 cialis 20mg metformin overdose mg generic esomeprazole nexium lexapro 10 mg target farmaco cialis 10 mg celebrex dosage 600 mg prednisone 20 mg zentiva augmentin 652 mg clomid 100mg bijsluiter cialis 10mg us cialis uk cheap erythromycin bs 500 mg levitra 10 mg foro cheapest clomid uk dosage zoloft 100mg wellbutrin xr 300 mg propranolol de 20 mg augmentin 500mg alcohol kamagra 100 mg bijwerking strattera drug buy lisinopril 20 mg e102 cialis day 5 mg lasix 40 mg dose erfahrungsbericht cialis 10mg tadalafil cialis 500mg zovirax 400mg dosage 150 mg doxycycline lexapro 10 mg success doxycycline mgd viagra 50 mg ra propranolol 20 mg bid nexium 20 mg ingredients levitra 10 mg online viagra italy online buy true viagra celebrex 400 mg dosage generic black cialis 100mg viagra etkisi generic cialis 48 pack black cialis 3000 mg online viagra safety cheap cialis online remedio nexium 40mg generic cipro 600mg priligy online satis free buy cialis Levitra 10 mg Buy nexium 10 mg forum nexium 40 mg otc 50 mg synthroid weight buy zithromax 1.0 gram 100mg clomid worked took 3 5mg cialis bactrim 10 mg propecia 0.2 mg xepasone 5mg prednisone siadocin doxycycline 100mg propranolol 10 mg opinie prednisone cheap online augmentin chewable 400 mg zovirax cream 20mg breaking 20 mg cialis starting 20 mg lexapro 40 mg levitra prices lisinopril lupin 40 mg nolvadex 30 tabs 10mg cialis nongeneric 1 mg valtrex generic for xenical clomid venda online kamagra 50mg doxycycline generic 1000mg viagra india online mail order propecia 10 vs 15 mg lexapro metformin hexal 850 mg augmentin 125 mg ulotka buy liquid lasix 5mg cialis india bugiardino cialis 20 mg zithromax antibiotikum 500 mg lexapro anxiety 20mg viagra 100mg tabs 36 hour cialis generic order propecia finasteride cialis 40 mg wirkung generic synthroid 2011 nexium 20 mg generico xenical 120mg costs cialis online websites buy american viagra cheap propecia cost zoloft lek 100 mg prednisone online 5 mlg doxycycline 20 mg buy wellbutrin not generic cheapest viagra 200mg propranolol bula 20mg bijsluiter lexapro 10 mg xenical kopen online synthroid generic substitution clomid 3 months 50 mg comprar generico viagra 400 mg wellbutrin sr augmentin 375 mg dosage buy cialis 20mg glucophage metformin 1000 mg prednisone online cheap generic cipro hc india generic zoloft cialis directions 20 mg cialis y sordera buy 150mg clomid glucophage tablet 500mg lisinopril 40 mg walmart generic lexapro 2012 price viagra online germany mg of bactrim cialis 10 ili 20 mg generic viagra kaufen nexium 40mg fungsinya viagra 150mg overdose buy clomid 25mg 500 mg viagra thailand cialis online vancouver cipro order generic lexapro 2012 name really cheap cytotec bactrim 480mg harga lisinopril 5mg valtrex generic 500mg cipro 250 mg price cialis 5 vs 10 20 mg levitra 10mg use levitra 10mg effects buy wellbutrin canada 200 mg generic viagra viagra online caution phenergan 25 mg cost lexapro 10 mg price zoloft 100 mg erowid viagra price 25 mg viagra onlinecom lisinopril mg dosage buy amoxil amoxicillin cialis tabs 5mg cialis 5 10mg cipro 55 mg cytotec online pharmacies nexium 20mg esomeprazole levitra generic china zithromax 500 mg tab propecia 0.25mg kullananlar buy lasix 80 mg cialis online 40 mg strattera 10 mg dosage 50 mg zoloft ocd online order valtrex 150 to 300 mg wellbutrin synthroid 125 mg daily cialis generic cheap prednisone 50mg beneficiios indicaciones cialis 20 mg euro cialis online wellbutrin buying levitra 5mg canada lexapro generic time lexapro generic teva levitra 15 mg prednisone 20mg tabs medicamento generico celebrex cialis 5 mg opinioni australia cialis online cialis generic manufacturer doxycycline hyclate order wellbutrin xl 75 mg pillspapa generic cialis trustable generic viagra nolvadex generic brand buspar overdose mg cialis generico e20 lexapro generics viagra online fedex cheapest genuine levitra celebrex 200 mg buy 5 mg cialis australia viagra generic leagle viagra mg 4 tablet 50 mg clomid follicles purchase generic xenical prednisone streuli 50 mg xenical generic cheap buy cipro without buy nolvadex dropper levitra generic pills prednisone 50 mg withdrawal generic lexapro fda zoloft 50 mg filmtabletta propecia athens buy lasix mg dosage harga viagra 10mg zovirax 50 mg buy 80mg strattera generic viagra mycoxafloppin glucophage 850 mg fiyati 25 mg di viagra increase lexapro 10mg medication cipro 500 mg cheap viagra substitutes wellbutrin generic efficacy prednisone 20mg westward
Home Pete Toms LWIB: Survey Testing Court Battle, Plus A's and Rays Stadium Updates

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 982 guests online

Atom RSS

LWIB: Survey Testing Court Battle, Plus A's and Rays Stadium Updates PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 30 November 2009 00:32

Last Week in Bizball by Pete Toms

This week in LWIB, no end in sight in the “survey testing” court battle plus updates on the Rays and A’s hopes for new ballparks.

“SURVEY TESTING” COURT BATTLE PROLONGED

Despite several years of relentless media coverage, federal investigations and congressional hearings in to steroid use amongst MLB players, there is yet little to no evidence of a fan backlash. The 2009 season (if we include spring training) saw some of the games biggest and most popular star players admit openly (Alex Rodriguez) or tacitly (David Ortiz) that they had previously used PEDs. As well, Manny Ramirez was suspended for 50 games after testing positive for a banned substance widely used by steroid users to restart natural testosterone production following a “cycle”. All that following years of “I’m not here to talk about the past”, BALCO, The Mitchell Report, Clemens/McNamee, etc. Nonetheless, MLB has prospered greatly this decade. The official line from MLB is that the “steroid era” is a regrettable aspect of the game’s history and today’s game is “clean”. Commissioner Selig recently told Bob Costas in an interview for the MLB Network:

The sport is cleaned up. We administered 3,700 tests at the Major League level this year and two positives. ... We had 8,995 tests in the Minor Leagues. That program is nine years old. We are down to seven-tenths of one percent.

Fans of MLB appear to have neither cared about PED use in the first place or have been placated by a combination of The Mitchell Report and more rigorous “testing”. Or, maybe everybody became sick to death of the subject. However, there is at least one sub plot in the “steroid era” saga that will not be concluded for at least a few and perhaps several years. LWIB saw Solicitor General Elena Kagan order the 9th U.S. Court of Appeals to rehear the case over whether federal investigators violated the Fourth Amendment when they seized the results of thousands of drug tests during a search for the records of 10 MLB players implicated in “BALCO”.

The “anonymous” survey testing of 2003 was negotiated by the MLBPA and MLB in an attempt to measure the prevalence of steroid use amongst players. The results of the “survey testing” would in turn determine whether mandatory drug testing be introduced. In 2004, BALCO investigators seized the electronic results of all 104 (reportedly) players that tested positive (as opposed to the 10 “BALCO” players they had warrants for). Subsequently the MLBPA went to court and argued that the seizure of all 104 (reportedly) test results violated the Fourth Amendment. The MLBPA requested that the evidence be returned. There have been three rulings in the case, the most recent by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in August sided with the MLBPA. Solicitor General Kagan’s interest in the case has nothing to do with steroid use in MLB and everything to do with the interpretation of the “plain view doctrine” in computer evidence searches. That the Solicitor General has ordered all 27 judges of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear the case (as opposed to the previous 9 who ruled “en banc”) emphasizes the importance of the case to the Federal Government. A resolution is not expected for perhaps as many as several years as reports this week predicted that the case will eventually be heard by The Supreme Court.

As such, several longstanding questions surrounding the “survey testing” will go unanswered for the foreseeable future. Will the test results be returned and eventually destroyed by the MLBPA? Will the identities of all players who tested positive eventually be revealed en masse? Will or should or can the MLBPA reveal the full results of the “survey testing” in order to preserve the reputations of “clean” players? Can the Commissioner reveal the results “in the best interests of baseball”, arguing that full disclosure would “turn the page” on the “steroid era”? Might a player or players testing positive whose name(s) was leaked to the media eventually sue the MLBPA for not destroying the test results (as was promised to the players) prior to seizure by federal investigators. Subsequent to the August ruling of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, law professor Michael McCann raised these issues at SI.com:

Provided the Supreme Court does not reverse the Ninth Circuit, the list will likely remain under seal indefinitely, if not permanently. All parties to the litigation, as well as their lawyers and other personnel, are barred from releasing the names. The MLBPA, which is a party to the litigation, thus lacks the legal authority to release the names.

MLBPA could eventually seek a court order that would enable it to divulge the remaining names. The MLBPA could reason that while disclosure might harm the interests of 97 players, it would serve the best interests of the far more numerous number of other MLB players, who would be cleared from suspicion. MLBPA, however, would pursue such a strategy under the peril of being sued by the 97 named players for breach of fiduciary duties. As a labor union, the MLBPA and its officials owe duties of trust and competence to each of the players. Releasing the names would undoubtedly harm the reputations of the named players and possibly jeopardize their player contracts and endorsement deals. Named players could also file a grievance with the National Labor Relations Board.

Unlike the MLBPA, Major League Baseball is not a party to the litigation. If MLB has the list, it could theoretically release it, but doing so would likely trigger a legal action commenced by the MLPBA. …..

Commissioner Selig could nonetheless argue that the "best interests of the game" authority, as vaguely contained in MLB's constitution (a document originally drafted in 1921 and not one collectively bargained with the MLBPA), accords him sufficient authority to release the remaining names. In Selig's defense, the list has embarrassed baseball and prompted unwanted speculation as to who might be on it. Even worse for Selig, the list returns to the public spotlight every time a name or two is leaked. Selig might understandably feel that the only way the game can move on from the Steroid Era in Baseball would be to release the entire list, a move recently endorsed by Hall of Famer Hank Aaron.

AND

MLBPA's failure to protect the names from the government's investigation into BALCO bears mention. While such a failure might call into question whether MLBPA officials adequately satisfied their fiduciary duties, the Ninth Circuit's opinion suggests that fault should lie with the government. For that reason, the MLBPA may be less susceptible to any potential legal challenge brought by a named player.

More names are likely to be leaked before this case is finally settled . When Mark McGwire walks on to the field at 2010 spring training wearing a St. Louis Cardinals’ uniform the “steroids era” will again, however briefly, be a focal point for the baseball media. And when the Barry Bonds perjury trial begins it will bring much media attention to the same subject. Again, while fans are inevitably curious about who “cheated” and who didn’t, the continued enormous popularity of MLB indicates that the “steroid era” has had little impact on their avidity. But until these last “steroid era” subplots are concluded, the subject will remain a semi-regular topic of discussion in the baseball media. Last week’s edict from Solicitor General Kagan ensures that that conclusion remains far off.

Select Read More to see details on the A's and Rays Stadium Updates

OAKLAND AND TAMPA BAY STADIUM UPDATES

This coming season will be the first for the Minnesota Twins Target Field. The Florida Marlins expect to move into their new ballpark beginning with the 2012 season. Setting aside the Twins and Marlins, only 3 franchises (Toronto, Oakland and Tampa Bay) remain without a “retro style” ballpark. LWIB saw updates on both the A’s and Rays efforts to construct new ballparks.

A’s owner Lewis Wolff’s plans to construct a new “baseball only” stadium in Fremont collapsed under the weight of the recession (the stadium was part of a much larger real estate development plan) and local opposition. Speculation that the Oakland Coliseum (the A’s present home) would be retrofitted to a “baseball only” facility (a la what the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim did with their stadium) must be considered moot since the recent announcement that the Oakland Raiders extended their lease through 2013 for the same stadium. Earlier this year MLB formed a committee to study the A’s options for a new ballpark, including the possibility of re-location within northern California. (I.E. San Jose) Commissioner Selig would likely have to grant the A’s permission to move to San Jose as the city, as per MLB’s rules, is part of the San Francisco Giants’ territory. (The alternative would be a lengthy court battle) The Giants and A’s will need to agree on a “territorial indemnification fee” (or some other form of compensation, see Angelos/Nationals) before Mr. Selig would ok the move. A site for the proposed new ballpark necessary to entice the A’s to San Jose has been selected and the requisite studies and campaign for public support are underway. LWIB saw a number of Bay Area media reports on the possibility of the San Jose re-location. The genesis of these reports were recent interviews that A’s owners Wolff and majority partner John Fisher conducted with select local media. While Mr. Wolff has long been the public face of the A’s attempts to obtain a new stadium, the media access to the very private Mr. Fisher was notable. Joe Stiglich reported in the Contra Costa Times:

An article published in the December issue of San Francisco magazine reinforced the desire and motivation of the Oakland A’s ownership group to move the team to San Jose.

AND

"From the moment we bought this team, the most important thing for Lew and I was to build a new ballpark to keep the A’s in the Bay Area," Fisher is quoted as saying in the article. "Our conclusion is that the best opportunity to build a ballpark is in downtown San Jose."

Here is the San Francisco magazine piece quoted by Mr. Stiglich. At his Field of Schemes blog, Neil deMause questioned the journalistic integrity of the SF magazine piece, highlighting the reporter’s extensive personal history with A’s ownership. It is not last week’s public statements by the A’s owners that is noteworthy per se. More interesting is what this spate of media coverage orchestrated by Mr.‘s Wolff and Fisher reveals about the increasing urgency of their desire to advance the new stadium agenda.

Just as A’s minority owner Lewis Wolff’s Fremont plan was detonated by the recession, the Tampa Bay Rays last year temporarily abandoned a campaign to obtain a new stadium in the Tampa / St. Petersburg region. This despite their unprecedented on field success in 2008. Pleas for new stadiums are not politically popular during recessionary times. However, the construction of new ballparks in Minnesota and Miami tells us that these negotiations can go on for decades before agreement is reached. And so, the lobbying for a new Rays ballpark has resumed. Tampa Bay stadium advocacy group The ABC Coalition recently released a draft report of their study on the need of and best location for a new Rays ballpark. Central Florida News 13 reported:

The ABC Coalition concluded if Tropicana Field is not replaced in a timely fashion, the Tampa Bay area could lose Major League Baseball.

Committee members approved a draft report saying sites should be considered in both Pinellas and Hillsborough counties.

The report said the Trop is outdated, and the Rays need a more “fan-friendly” stadium.

The report pointed out the Rays still have some of the lowest attendance numbers among Major League teams. The report said the stadium needs to be in a place that’s easier to get to if the Rays want to boost attendance.

“It’s not a question of whether a new venue needs to be put in place to keep the Rays healthy in the long-term,” said Jeff Lyash, chairman of the ABC Coalition. “It’s a question of when and where.”

Not surprisingly, the release of the draft report met with a negative reaction from St. Petersburg officials. (The Rays current home, Tropicana Field, is located in St. Petersburg) Stephen Nohlgren reported for the St. Petersburg Times:

A draft report by the group examining possibilities for a new major league baseball stadium has provoked a pointed response from the city of St. Petersburg:

Tropicana Field is "fan friendly,'' the Tampa Bay Rays are legally required to play there for the next 17 years, and don't involve the Rays in Hillsborough stadium discussions without the city's approval.

That's the gist of an e-mail to the stadium group Wednesday by St. Petersburg development director Rick Mussett.

AND

Mussett's letter made several points.

• The Rays always knew that revenues at the dome would be lower than at other cities. That's why the Trop contract gave St. Petersburg a smaller slice of stadium revenues than fellow expansion city Phoenix received from the Diamondbacks. The dome was more of a Chevrolet-type stadium, not a Cadillac, original owner Vince Naimoli said.

• The Rays were one of only nine teams to increase attendance in 2009, though the Tampa Bay area had higher unemployment than all but two other major league markets.

Both franchises (A’s and Rays) have much to resolve before agreements are finalized to construct new ballparks. (The A’s are much further ahead though) However MLB owners across the country, with the help of sympathetic local politicians, local advocacy groups (ie, local business), developers, fans and constructions unions have a perfect record in winning approval for new ballpark initiatives. How much time will pass before the A’s and Rays move into new ballparks is impossible to predict but bet that it will happen.


OTHER NEWS FROM THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK

(THE BIZ OF FOOTBALL)

(THE BIZ OF HOCKEY)

(THE BIZ OF BASKETBALL)

(SPORTS BASH)


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?