zovirax 50 mg strattera 10 mg wikipedia 80 mg propranolol effects avlocardyl propranolol 40 mg generic viagra 10mg generic viagra cheap order cheap diflucan 100mg clomid worked propecia buy canada buy 1 viagra wellbutrin generic xl sandoz viagra generico doxycycline 300 mg solu caverta generic viagra cheap cialis fast strattera bipolar 2 disorder bactrim forte 800 mg nexium cpr 40 mg lisinopril 5 mg pill generic brand nexium viagra 100mg pfizer 12 celebrex de 400 mg generic cipro 500mg propecia 5mg diflucan price generic prednisone 5mg directions cheap clomid 50mg nexium 40 mg day generic cialis prices zoloft buy taking 5mg cialis buy propecia cheapest beograd cialis 10mg erythromycin cheap cialis 10mg potecy generic viagra proffesional periactin 4 mg used lexapro 15 mg price viagra produce sordera hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg dosage lasix 40 mg forum clomid 50mg conceiving clomid 12.5mg cipro 25 mg levitra 10mg reviews 150mg clomid ovulation medicine lisinopril 10 mg zithromax 500 mg indications cheap lasix paypal dreampharmaceuticals online wellbutrin cialis generic4all lasix 12.5mg cost ordering viagra valtrex 500mg dosage acquisto cialis generic cialis 5mg 14 szt propranolol 40 mg reviews prezzo celebrex 200 mg prednisone apo 50 mg augmentin generic price 150mg viagra online doxycycline hyclate 100mg 500 cialis 80mg jakarta metformin heumann 850 mg lexapro 90 mg cipro hcl 250 mg glucophage forte 850 mg nexium 40 mg tabletten amoxil 50 mg buy american viagra 30 mg lexapro breastfeeding 30 mg propranolol cialis generic fast buy celebrex canada cialis 50mg review generic 80 mg lasix kamagra jelly 25mg remedio generico xenical nexium online canada drug online viagra online meds cialis zithromax 500 mg tab generic lexapro fda cipro 500 mg flakon celebrex 200 mg kapseln cialis generico precio 80 mg of lisinopril generic priligy 30mg farmaco diflucan 150 mg lyme doxycycline 100mg viagra online affidabile nabp viagra online generic pharmacy cialis propecia generico finasteride lisinopril 5mg dosage viagra 100mg poveikis generic wellbutrin image prednisone 30 mg online cialis 20mg original lexapro 5 mg prise xenical 200 mg augmentin mylan generics viagra sildenafil 25mg medicamento lasix 40 mg kamagra 100 mg wirkung augmentin 1000 mg nedir wellbutrin generic options cipro tabletki 500 mg prednisone 20mg rash prednisone 20 mg appetite existe xenical generico half cialis 20mg mailorder viagra doxycycline online cheap valtrex generic cheapest prospect viagra 50 mg nexium generic 30 pills chinese viagra buy wellbutrin generic itching valtrex 1000 mg levitra generic review cialis preis 5 mg buy viagra trusted order propecia finasteride celebrex 100mg erfahrungsberichte lexapro mood disorder generic lexapro purchase clomid shop online order zithromax online prednisone 10mg 5442 cialis 5 mg ipp online viagra lloyds acquistare levitra 5 mg 1cheap cialis online about viagra 800mg buy 150 mg viagra cytotec online philippines trusty online viagra cialis china order lexapro generic teva cipro 500 mg etkileri order cialis 20mg cialis 20 mg boots 180mg strattera clomid 50 mg iui tetracycline 50mg synthroid . 1 mg buy zithromax use levitra buy toronto clomid 100mg buy cialis gel generic buying lasix online lexapro 20 mg pregnant cialis nongeneric 10 mg lisinopril viagra online genuine 7.5mgsdaily of lexapro pastile cialis 20mg 60 mg of strattera xenical 120mg ireland cialis day 5 mg buy viagra 50 cialis 20mg effets clomid uk order clomid 50mg ovulation prednisone 20 mg online cheap viagra you pfizer zithromax online zovirax 800 mg dose viagra cheap reviews lexapro order online lexapro dosage 10 mg wellbutrin 50mg high achat levitra 10mg Online Levitra 90 pills cipro 500 mg pill zovirax 200mg directions cipro 750 mg fiyati augmentin xr 1 mg 62.5 viagra generico sandoz nexium 40 mg prospecto celebrex generic dosage strattera price generic prednisone 20mg. mayo tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg thuoc celebrex 200mg synthroid generic ok 150 mg viagra dose tablet clomid 50mg increase mg propecia phenergan 25 mg effects celebrex 200 mg indicaciones acyclovir 800 mg zovirax lexapro 20 mg ml viagra buy ebay lexapro generics cialis 20mg proffenials cialis 20 mg doctissimo viagra pills 200 mg lisinopril 40 mg teva generic celebrex same clomid 50 mg price take cialis 20mg cialis 5mg portugal erfahrungen viagra 100mg celebrex 200 mg pills wellbutrin generic 150 mg levitra 20 mg effects propranolol 20 mg presentations sildon generic viagra diflucan tablets cheap cialis canadian 40mg viagra vegeta 200mgl brown cialis generic cheap cialis web glucophage 850 mg fiyati levitra 10mg bayer miglior viagra generico kamagra 100mg cenik 100mg zoloft daily cialis rezept online buy uk kamagra buy cheap periactin diflucan 200mgcandidose online viagra malaysia buy diflucan cheap 20 mg cialis online strattera cheaper prednisone 0.5 mg tab glucophage 500 mg poudre nexium 10mg packet prednisone tablets 25mg about 20mg levitra 50 mg clomid follicles clomid 100mg miscarriage buy nolvadex online 2013 online patika kamagra kegunaan nexium 40 mg cheapest authentic propecia cialis 20mg doctissimo medication metformin 500 mg viagra 50 mg 2 tablet doxycycline vet buy quick kamagra online viagra generico brasil generic wellbutrin xl 450 vanzari viagra 50mg potenzmittel levitra 20mg cytotec generico funciona generico do xenical buy diflucan 150 mg celebrex 200mg capsulas propranolol 40 mg cena cialis money order 5 mg lexapro tired clomid 50mg grossesse nexium generic ppi acheter cialis generic prise cialis 40 mg cialis online vancouver viagra generico resolve cheap levitra paypal buying kamagra bangkok lexapro 1omg erfahrungen online viagra tesco viagra 100mg wellbutrin 75 mg prednisone 10 mg allergies celebrex 200 mg alkohol levitra vardenafil 20mg kamagra 100mg chewable viagra online fedex red viagra 600mg buy zithromax 250 mg tapering prednisone 50 mg strattera 25 mg capsule generics24 kamagra buy uk metformin cialis buy london bactrim 160 800 mg zovirax generic version prednisone 6 day 10mg cialis 5 vs 10 20 mg glucophage tabletas 500 mg safe cialis online buying synthroid online reichen 5 mg levitra buy priligy cheap online kamagra augmentin 457 mg 5 ml augmentin antibiotic 625mg cheap viagra with levitra 10 mg plm viagra 20 mg fiyati cialis 10 mg vs 20 nexium 150 mg india generic zoloft lisinopril actavis 20mg nexium cap40mg clomid 50 mg cipla ert generic viagra order cialis 50 mg generic viagra london bactrim 80 400 mg tablets glaxosmithkline generic wellbutrin doxycycline 100 mg ingredients propranolol 10 mg migraines cialis 10mg lilly increase lexapro 10mg diflucan 150 mg kapsula viagra 100 mg dawkowanie mexico viagra generic augmentin 875 buy lexapro what mg generic viagra cumming erythromycin cream online amoxil dosage 500 mg 50 mg cialis last clomid success 50 mg metformin sr 500mg 20 mg doxycycline online metformin 500 mg smell tratamiento diflucan 150 mg wellbutrin generic issues cialis 20 mg woman propecia 1mg 84 levitra 10 mg pill erfahrung cialis 5mg celebrex buy online strattera uk buy iene viagra online 100. mg kamagra online augmentin 625 mg prescription precio viagra 100 mg 5mg cialis last 30 mg strattera online achat clomid 50mg cialis de 5 mgrs ciprofloxacin cipro generic nexium cheaper ucuz cialis 20 mg generic lexapro better valtrex generic pregnancy lisinopril 40 mg walmart buy clomid ireland levitra 75mg generic wellbutrin price cialis tadalafil 80 mg viagra 25 mg tablets buying cytotec online zithromax 250 mg dosage remedio nexium 40mg 200 mg cytotec zithromax indications 900mg buy 20mg cialis nexium online sampling zoloft 50 mg enough synthroid buy taking150mg viagra nexium 10 mg diluye order xenical uk 200 mg clomid twins generic zovirax india cheap cialis line wellbutrin 37.5 mg zoloft buying buy clomid nz lasix 40 mg uputstvo buy cialis singapore dosis nexium 40 mg wellbutrin 30 mg cialis kaufen online get propranolol online diflucan vendita online viagra when generic lasix 500 mg precio generico al cialis valtrex online cheap cialis 5mg promo strattera 40 mg lexapro generic cvs viagra 100 mg prospecto buy propecia fsa 15 vs 10 mg lexapro adcirca cialis cheaper achat cialis 10mg cialis singapore online propranolol 40 mg precio priligy 30 mg funciona buy cytotec ireland cialis de 5mg. msds doxycycline 25 mg cialis shop online prednisone 40 mg tablets cialis 5 o 10 mg safest viagra online 2 25mg of viagra fake clomid online buy cialis australia clomid order paypal lexapro buy 10mg doxycycline buy australia viagra tesco buy cialis cheap melbourne drug prednisone 20 mg generic valtrex expensive propecia online espana buy lasix mumbai 20mg lexapro dangerous order propecia forum generic brand levitra levitra coupons 20 mg erythromycin ophthalmic generic 40 mg lexapro propranolol 40 mg surdosage kamagra 50 mg jelly 2.5mg generic cialis lisinopril hydrochlorothiazide 10 12.5 mg medicamento cialis generico viagra 50mg 100mg generic buspar cost 50mg levitra viagra uk buy doxycycline accord 200mg diflucan 150 ml buy buying viagra europe medicine levitra 20 mg buying cialis vietnam lexapro 1mg clomid pct 50mg cvs 5 mg cialis bactrim forte 160 mg wellbutrin 150 mg kullananlar clomid online 50mg cialis 20 mg peak obat valtrex 500 mg cytotec online pharmacies female viagra 100 mg clomid tablets 100mg prednisone 10 mg cialis 5 mg confezione generic valtrex brand diflucan 200 mg iv buy viagra rx lasix 10 mg compresse buying 800 mg viagra prednisone 10mg use generic cialis dosage generic viagra dropship kamagra 100mg nederland scherzartikel online viagra buy kamagra 100 mg lisinopril 20mg prices augmentin 875 mg tabletta cipro tablets 500 mg buy doxycycline forum generic viagra walgreens buy viagra zimbabwe generic metformin 500 mg lexapro 10mg sleep generic 5 mg cialis cialis 10 mg filmtabletten buy doxycycline generique doxycycline kela 200 mg levitra 5 mg dosierung propranolol 40 mg anxiety propranolol 10 mg opinie cipro 250 mg harnwegsinfekt celebrex dosage 600 mg medicamento nolvadex 10 mg kamagra 100 mg sobres generika clomid 50mg buy doxycycline china nexium 20mg tablet buy online valtrex acquistare xenical online nolvadex 20mg kur levitra generic us viagra generica online buying safe cialis buy clomid 25mg medicament nexium 40mg augmentin 156 mg syrup viagra online samples priligy 20 mg generic viagra onlineusa metformin buying order propecia generic buying viagra penang sildenafil 100 mg viagra viagra cheap fedex viagra generic information cialis generic 20 1000 mg amoxil online viagra liquid buy uk clomid strattera 25mg cost sordera por viagra augmentin 500 mg posologie prednisone dog mg
Home Pete Toms LWIB: The Pirates and the Revenue-Sharing Debate, Cubs "Non-Sale Sale", Local ESPN.coms and MLB Local Digital Rights

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 438 guests online

Atom RSS

LWIB: The Pirates and the Revenue-Sharing Debate, Cubs "Non-Sale Sale", Local ESPN.coms and MLB Local Digital Rights PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 16
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 28 September 2009 08:38

Last Week in Bizball by Pete Toms

This week in LWIB, the abysmal performance of the Pittsburgh Pirates calls in to question the usefulness of revenue-sharing in MLB, the “nonsale sale” of the Chicago Cubs and will ESPN’s growing collection of local websites bring more urgency to the issue of control of local digital rights in MLB?

THE PITTSBURGH PIRATES AND THE REVENUE-SHARING DEBATE

The Pittsburgh Pirates last winning season was 1992. Even in that context, their dismal September performance has been noteworthy. LWIB, Dejan Kovacevic wrote for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, “This is, officially, indisputably, the worst baseball seen in Pittsburgh in more than a century.” Earlier this month LWIB reported that in reaction to the on field dominance of large payroll clubs this season, some small payroll clubs are agitating for increased revenue-sharing in the next CBA. Pirates President Frank Coonelly is among that group.

The continuing, long term, on field futility of the Pirates inevitably leads to a debate which has been ongoing within MLB since revenue-sharing was introduced after the 1994 strike. Are small market franchises investing their revenue-sharing receipts in improving their baseball teams or using that revenue for other purposes? Murray Chass wrote recently about the Pirates.

The Pirates, one of the smallest revenue teams in the majors, received approximately $40 million in revenue-sharing last year and most likely will get at least that much, despite the economy, for this year. One thing we know for sure. They aren’t spending the money to pay players.

Under the collective bargaining agreement, teams that receive money have to notify the commissioner’s office each April what they did with the money the previous year.

“They’re going to have some explaining to do,” a baseball official said. “It’s going to be difficult for them absent some substantial moves between now and April.”

High-revenue teams don’t appreciate revenue recipients that don’t spend the money to improve themselves but pocket it instead. The commissioner’s office is supposed to monitor the spending to make sure teams use the money as they’re supposed to, but no team has ever been disciplined or even reprimanded for not using it correctly.

The Pirates might be a good place for the commissioner to start.

This criticism of revenue-sharing is not new and not restricted to the Pirates. Since revenue-sharing was introduced there have been many examples of small market clubs (including the 2009 Pirates) whose revenue-sharing receipts exceeded their big league payroll. These same small market clubs also receive central fund dollars (national TV, merchandising). In fairness to the Pirates, Mr. Chass noted in a follow-up column that they have increased their investment in the amateur draft the past two seasons and also spent money on a new Dominican baseball academy.

According to Commissioner Selig, approximately $450 million will be redistributed this season as per MLB’s revenue-sharing formula. However the payouts and receipts of individual clubs is a bit of a guessing game as MLB is increasingly secretive about the details. Maury Brown reported for The Biz of Baseball in June that MLB has been withholding the figures from the media for the past few seasons.

MLB acknowledged during the last CBA negotiations that there were problems with the revenue-sharing formula in MLB. MLB concluded that under the previous CBA, the revenue-sharing formula provided too much disincentive for clubs to increase local revenues ( i.e. win more games, improve stadiums ). Put too simply and crassly, it was too often more financially advantageous for clubs to field inferior teams and maximize on revenue-sharing. The current CBA was amended to address this problem. Sports Economist Andrew Zimbalist was employed by MLB during the last CBA negotiations to change the revenue-sharing formula with the goal of improving upon its contribution to greater competitive balance. Again, too simply and crassly, the marginal tax rates upon which revenue-sharing are calculated were lowered in the current CBA. Mr. Zimbalist explained the new revenue-sharing formula in The Sports Business Journal in 2006. Of the former formula Mr. Zimbalist wrote;

Such a high marginal rate discouraged the low-revenue club from improving team performance and undermined the system’s goal of greater competitive balance.

Second, it created a cliff problem, whereby a team initially just above the median could, after revenue-sharing, end up with less net revenue than a team just below the median.

The new deal addresses these problems

And of the new formula Mr. Zimbalist wrote that it, “…provides a stronger incentive to teams to increase local revenue.” Mr. Zimbalist also wrote of the new formula, “These factors encourage team success as well as entrepreneurial behavior by the owners.”

Whether or not the changes made to revenue-sharing under this CBA have ameliorated the problems present in the former formula is probably only known by the owners and the MLBPA. Prior to this season there was evidence of greater competitive balance under the current CBA. Last season the Rays and Brewers both competed in the post season and in 2007 no club either won or lost 100 games - a rarity. However this season large payroll clubs will comprise practically all of the playoff teams, resulting in renewed concerns about “competitive balance” amongst pundits. Earlier this month, Joe Posnanski provided a broader perspective at SI.com.

There have only been 20 streaks in baseball history where a team finished below .500 for 10 or more seasons in a row -- and a quarter of those have come in the last decade. And those five long losing streaks don't even include the Royals, whose quirky 2003 season interrupted 14 losing years, or the Reds, who are one year away from a 10-year losing steak of their own.

Maury Brown argued recently at The Biz of Baseball that increased parity in MLB (if parity is measured by the number of small payroll clubs in the postseason) is a direct result of the introduction of the wild card. Will the next CBA (the current agreement expires in December 2011) see more teams qualifying for the playoffs? While not advocating for the change, last week Peter Gammons discussed the benefits of expanding the playoffs. No doubt an expanded playoff format would prompt a bitterly negative reaction from many hardcore baseball fans and writers but it could satisfy the small market franchises demands for greater competitive balance.

Select Read More to see details of the Chicago Cubs "Non-Sale Sale". and Local ESPN.coms and MLB Digital Rights Fees

 

 

THE “NON-SALE SALE” OF THE CHICAGO CUBS

LWIB saw the sale of the Chicago Cubs from Tribune Co. to a group headed by Thomas Ricketts move forward when a Delaware bankruptcy judge gave his blessing to the transaction. As the deal nears completion (MLB owners could approve the deal in November) LWIB saw reports very critical of the structure of the sale. Maury Brown explained for The Biz of Baseball, “The structure of the transaction is technically not a “sale” with Tribune continuing to own a minority stake. In what is called a “leveraged partnership”, Tribune would avoid hundreds of millions of dollars in capital gains taxes.” The Chicago Tribune (also owned by Tribune Co.) reported, “Such partnerships require the blessing of the Internal Revenue Service, and Tribune Co. has been careful never to call the transaction a sale, a legal treatment that would negate the favorable tax treatment.”

LWIB, Allan Sloan wrote a column very critical of the deal. Mr. Sloan speculates that the deal could well attract scrutiny from the IRS. Mr. Sloan’s piece received much attention, being published in the Washington Post, CNNMoney.com and linked in the New York Times. From Mr. Sloan;

….Zell's nonsale sale of the Cubs, which would work like this. The Ricketts family, founders of Ameritrade (now TD Ameritrade), would put $150 million of cash into a partnership that would also borrow up to $698 million. Tribune would put the Cubs, Wrigley Field and related assets into the partnership.

Tribune would emerge with $740 million of cash and 5 percent of the partnership, while the Ricketts family would have 95 percent and operating control. Call me naive, but it sure seems to me that when you start with 100 percent and full control and end up with 5 percent, $740 million and no control, you've sold 95 percent.

Zell's tax folks, however, will argue that Tribune is getting nontaxable proceeds from a leveraged partnership. They'll also argue that Tribune's guarantee of some of the partnership's borrowings makes it a true partner of the Rickettses. Hello? A debt guarantee from a bankrupt company? What's that worth? Can you spell "nothing"?

By my estimate, Tribune would have about a $720 million gain -- the $740 million, less 95 percent of the $21 million Tribune paid for the Cubs in 1981. At a 40 percent federal-state combined rate, the gain would generate about $290 million in taxes. Instead, that money would go to Tribune's creditors.

For additional analysis of the structure and legality of the transaction, see George Washington Law School Professor Sarah Lawsky here and here.

LOCAL ESPN.coms AND MLB LOCAL DIGITAL RIGHTS

The Biz of Baseball has reported extensively on the ongoing efforts within MLB to resolve the issue of control of local digital rights. (See here, here and here.) Clubs (most notably the Red Sox and Yankees) with interests in RSNs have long lobbied for greater control of local digital rights. Their position has been that the clubs, in conjunction with their RSNs, are better positioned than MLBAM to maximize the value of these rights. This season MLB made progress on the long divisive issue, with MLBAM reaching agreements with the Padres and Yankees to provide live “in market” streaming of games.

As ESPN aggressively expands its roster of websites devoted to local content, will RSNs react by pressuring MLB for greater access to digital content? Is there now greater urgency for MLB to strike live “in market” steaming deals with more clubs? Last week Eric Fisher reported that today ESPN will launch ESPNDallas.com. This on the heels of the launch of ESPNBoston.com and the spring launch of ESPNChicago,com. Mr. Fisher also reports that early 2010 will see ESPN sites devoted to Los Angeles and New York. LWIB John Ourand reported in The Sports Business Journal that RSNs are, out of necessity, reacting aggressively to ESPN’s local initiatives.

RSNs have spent years virtually ignoring their Web sites, largely using them as placeholders while waiting for a digital business to develop. While ESPN was developing video and social-media applications, RSN sites offered little more than tune-in information.

In their defense, RSNs had no reason to ramp up an online strategy that promised little revenue. But that inaction is as responsible for opening the door for ESPN to expand locally as the problems local newspapers face.

AND

RSNs, though, believe they have a competitive advantage thanks to the local relationships they have developed with the teams and their fans. Several teams hold stakes in Comcast’s RSNs, including baseball’s Giants and White Sox. In Boston, NESN is partly owned by the Red Sox. Just last week, team owner John Henry launched a blog on NESN.com and told a personal story about David Ortiz.

“That’s the kind of access I’m going to have and no one else is going to have,” said NESN President Sean McGrail.

Most RSNs I talked to believe they will start streaming live local pro basketball and baseball games within the year, something they expect will give them another competitive advantage over ESPN, which will not have those rights. To do that, though, RSNs need to upgrade their sites, and that is something most are already planning.

MLB President and COO Bob DuPuy stated earlier this season that MLB plans to have live “in market” streaming deals in place for most teams at some point next season. ESPN’s local initiatives could accelerate this timetable.


OTHER NEWS FROM THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK

(THE BIZ OF FOOTBALL)

(THE BIZ OF HOCKEY)

(THE BIZ OF BASKETBALL)


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?