real clomid online bula propranolol 10mg viagra generic iasi cialis 200 mg pills clomid 50mg reviews cialis eu buy diflucan 100 mg prezzo generic wellbutrin wpi 3332 buying cialis online viagra 100 mg n1 50 mg viagra fiyat cialis 10 mg tabs lasix retard 60 mg safest cialis online lasix 10 mg price clomid 50mg quads generic valtrex color prednisone tabletki 5mg zovirax buy online generic lexapro sertraline prednisone 50 mg apo 150 mg wellbutrin cipro 500 mg reviews nexium 40 mg 30 tablet halving 20mg cialis strattera atomoxetina 10 mg clomid 50 mg posologie levitra generic italiano nexium mups 10mg clomid 50 mg cost priligy 60mg tablets viagra generic singapore viagra online ar propranolol 40 mg alcohol clomid 50 mg zwanger generic viagra uk. webmd generic viagra start zoloft 50 mg levitra can 40 mg nolvadex tamoxifen buy levitra 20mg generique nexium 20 bulk buy celebrex 100 mg cena metformin 500 mg for dapoxetine pills online get cytotec online generic celebrex 200mg buying kamagra online buy research nolvadex doxycycline 100mg fish synthroid 88 mg tablet price 20 mg cialis cheap diflucan cheap viagra discount cheap viagra 800mg online cialis doctor levitra 20 mg norge medicine prednisone 20 mg cialis online belgie strattera buy online lisinopril 5 mg tabletas 2.5mg citalopram metformin 500 mg smell celebrex capsules 200mg clomid 50 mg buy generic celebrex canada lisinopril stada 5 mg levitra tab 20 mg augmentin de 600 mg cialis 20 mg presentaciones 2.5 mg cialis reviews propecia mg buy cialis israel generic nolvadex australia cheapest strattera online taking 4 5 mg cialis cialis levitra online online pharmacy propecia sobres nexium 10 mg buy viagra mississauga kamagra 50 mg jelly strattera going generic nexium 40 mg used nexium 40 mg benefits wellbutrin 75 mg tablets clomid with hmg 40mg cheap cialis canine prednisone 20mg levitra generic viagra 800 mg dose viagra generic walmart zoloft 50 mg cena viagra online approval levitra vardenafil generico viagra online business hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg hp 47 order lisinopril online augmentin dosage mg viagra 1oo mg clomid 50mg 100mg nexium online generic levitra generic ran levitra 10mg 12 generic priligy online wellbutrin 15 xl generic valtrex generic problems prednisone 7.5 mg medikament celebrex 200mg canadian cialis 20mg buy levitra online 500 mg generic cialis cialis generic experience lisinopril online uk 80 mg nexium dosage strattera 80mg xenical 180 mg doxycycline 100 mg sandoz 100mg cialis desciption 500 mg diflucan vand cialis 10 mg xenical kaufen online levitra filmtabletten 10 mg sirve cytotec generico original viagra online hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg po viagra 25mg online generic strattera safe generico viagra preco viagra 25mg review 7 nexium 40 mg capsule strattera dosage 100 mg valtrex 1000 mg dosage viagra generic leagle cheapest herbal viagra metformin er 500mg 142 buy nolvadex online 2011 levitra 20 mg costo diflucan price online buy zithromax qatar order lasix cheap doxycycline 100 mg spc propranolol 10 mg cena cialis 20 mg awp buying viagra chemist prednisone dosage 25mg generic medicine propecia prednisone 15 mg dosage wellbutrin 150 mg beipackzettel nexium 40 mg patency buy viagra cheapest cheap cialis si metformin dosage 250mg diflucan 150 mg 1 capsule zovirax filmtabletten 400 mg viagra mg dosierung cheap cipla cialis buspar hcl 15mg order viagra us cheap propecia tablets clomid 50mg cm cipro 750 generic levitra 5mg cheap metformin 1000 mg fiyati levitra generico contraindicaciones viagra 20mg wirkung buy viagra jamaica uk viagra cheap generico synthroid merck cialis cheap europe diflucan 500mg buy viagra craigslist generic viagra approval generic valtrex prices 3generic meltabs viagra generic viagra vipps zoloft generic color lexapro generic discussion generic cialis 20 online propecia buy cheap buy cipro zithromax viagra pesni online zithromax 500 mg gonore doxycycline mono generic prednisone 5mg use pastillas metformin 850 mg lexapro 10 mg cena viagra generic paypal zovirax buying online prednisone mood disorders 10 vs 20 mg lexapro generic lexapro india 50 mg zoloft anxiety zithromax 500 mg bestellen viagra 50 vs 100mg cipro 550 mg augmentin 250 mg suspension 25mg viagra dosage buy priligy lebanon doxycycline 100mg x14 xenical 60mgsrp daily cialis 20mg prednisone 10 mg online phenergan 10mg dose levitra 20mg nexium 20mg 28 comprimidos tadalafila cialis 5 mg augmentin available generic cheap nexium ebaytbuy viagra kamagra 100mg india generic synthroid buy melbourne online viagra 12.5 mg synthroid diflucan 150 mg generico propecia order australia diflucan 150 mg 2 compresse lexapro 5mg ingredients presentacion cialis 10 mg best buy viagra clomid kaufen online 20mg lexapro lot zovirax order canadian doxycycline 20 mg cost medicamento levitra 10 mg gnc generic viagra lisinopril 05mg efectos citalopram buy online generic levitra does notice viagra 50mg zoloft 50 or 100 mg viagra boots buy 20mg lexapro reviews viagra price buy cheapest viagra nicosia 150 mgs zoloft cialis 5mg india celebrex 200mg ibuprofen lisinopril sandoz 5 mg lexapro 20 mg uses buying cialis shanghai cialis 50mg ingredients lasix 500 mg pret valtrex 500mg online online propecia subscription buying cialis legally nexium sobres 10 mgs erythromycin 250mg tabs mail order viagra 150 buy propecia 90 augmentin gonorrhea 250mg 200 mg doxycycline chlamydia bijwerkingen nexium 20 mg strong cialis 40 mg zoloft generic problems componentes nexium 40 mg 800 mg cialis 1000 mg zoloft nexium 40mg indonesia viagra online latvia lisinopril generic lupin zovirax acyclovir 200 mg viagra 25mg dose cialis 10 mg cipla buy priligy 30mg dosage nexium 40 mg viagra de 10 mg metformin xr generic online pharmacy prednisone price cialis 20 mg irish viagra online viagra 50 mg contraindicaciones levitra 5mg tabs prednisone streuli 5 mg cialis 10 generico viagra 500mg buy kamagra 100mg bestellen viagra online vietnam nexium 40mg n28 priligy 30 mg indicazioni cialis 5 mg 28 compresse viagra generico 24 horas amoxil 500mg wiki pvp cialis 10 mg xcheap cialis india buy generic metformin cialis online stockholm viagra 50 mg 30 tablet le nexium 20mg propecia generic finasteride erythromycin ophthalmic generic generic viagra 600mg 45 mg buspar online viagra business glucophage 1000 mg fiyat metformin sr 500mg herbal 600mg viagra lisinopril 20 mg ratiopharm metformin 500 mg purchase xenical 120 mg india cheap viagra generica propecia online india generico do synthroid 4mg viagra tablets lisinopril 20 mg buy erythromycin 250 mg ulotka lasix 20mg tab zoloft 100 mg withdrawal generic cialis wiki celebrex generic 200mg prednisone 10 mg ivf diflucan fluconazole 200 mg bactrim ointment generic cialis 20 mg compresse buy viagra authentic generic propecia uk clomid buy 25 mg 5 cialis generico sildenafil order cialis mail cheap cialis warwickshire phenergan 25 mg gravid doxycycline 100 mg daily cheap nexium 40 mg levitra half 20 mg buy viagra cheap generic levitra 25 mg herbal viagra 5800mg diflucan 50 mg tablets 5mg cialis directions medexpressrx generic viagra propecia cost buy buy doxycycline australia bactrim 400 800 mg fungsi erythromycin 400mg cheap viagra rx buy doxycycline singapore ordering clomid online cialis online florida buy levitra 90 pills viagra price 100 mg duree cialis 5mg cialis 10mg nedir cialis online comprar bay viagra online levitra 2 mg forum cialis 40 mg generic lexapro available doxycycline generic for cialis 5mg singapore viagra 100mg dosierung cialis online madrid prednisone dosage 50 mg cialis 20 mg wirkungen buy cheap metformin levitra 80mg buy 10 lasix pills free cialis 20mg viagra cialis generico order zoloft 100mg propecia cost online diflucan 150 mg globul obat cialis 50mg buy levitra noida buy viagra 2011 bangalore generic viagra buy cialis locally doxycycline hyclate cheap buy clomid reviews viagra pills mga 100 order 50mg levitra metformin 500 mg mylan order nexium 40 mg 40 mg lisinopril online ic doxycycline 100mg propecia online drugs viagra generic cheap kosten cialis 5mg 100 mg viagra lozenges clomid 200mg success viagra online local cialis 10 mg dosierung generic cialis china propranolol er 40 mg lisinopril hctz 5 mg augmentin 312mg 5ml cipro generic cipro zithromax 600 mg egypt propecia generic alternative prednisone withdrawal mg buy propecia brand generic zoloft heartburn cheapest canadian cialis strattera 60 mg generic online levitra prices mg of propranolol china buy cialis levitra 20 mg 3 free 40mg propranolol nexium online compare clomid pills cheap prednisone 80 mg dosage lexapro liver disorder 20mg cialis outdated doxycycline 100 mg oral levitra 20mg erfahrungsberichte nomes generic viagra order nexium 40mg generic for amoxil online cialis ankara synthroid 5 mg levitra generic usa acyclovir zovirax 200 mg cialis online definition cheap viagra germany strattera 40 mg 28 kapsul prednisone taper 7.5 mg lisinopril 20 mg wheezing cialis black 800mg generic zithromax uk levitra 10mg jenapharm order kamagra online 250 mg valtrex nolvadex 20mg uk nexium 40 mg spc prednisone 5 mg tablets drug lexapro 10 mg 5 mgs of cialis online cialis kaufen viagra 60 mg lisinopril 10 mg capsule levitra 10mg agora valtrex generic cheap strattera 80 mg recreational buy viagra nederland glucophage 500 mg ulotka generic celebrex 200 mg buying viagra illegal viagra online malta buy metformin generic 30 lisinopril 10 mg recall generic cialis 40mg strattera de 10 mg viagra 500mg online online cialis cheap nexium dosage 20mg generic strattera 10 mg kamagra 200 mg dose viagra 25mg duree buy professional levitra buy strattera uk cialis 5 mg brisbane buy nexium mastercard wild viagra buy viagra cheap alternative generic cialis aanbiedingen cialis cumpara online viagra 50 mg buy viagra black online dove viagra online generic viagra sweden nexium 20 mg adalah cialis 5 mg bijsluiter viagra buy contest xenical en generico bayer 20 mg cialis 25 mg zoloft pregnancy propecia generic nederland actavis generic wellbutrin celebrex online purchase zithromax 200 mg suspension amoxil bd 850mg buy viagra 150mg doxycycline 100mg prices 80 mg prednisone taper online viagra herbal generic levitra 5mg celebrex 200mg price doxycycline 20 mg bid cialis order greece viagra online faq wikipedia cialis 5mg 8 mg of prednisone zovirax cream generic farmaco cialis generico cialis 50 mg falso metformin 500 mg ingredients buy clomid twins lexapro escitalopram 10mg viagra 0.25 mg alegro buy amoxil 875 vipps generic viagra cialis 10 mg compresse lisinopril 40 mg statin buy levitra ireland buy cialis 10mg buy viagra boston prednisone 10 mg image doxycycline 100 mg indikasi prednisone 20mg price cialis mg dose
Home

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 794 guests online

Atom RSS

The Battle Over Content Fair Use Places "Aggregators" in the Crosshairs PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 28
PoorBest 
Maury Brown Article Archive
Written by Maury Brown   
Tuesday, 04 August 2009 03:27

The Biz of Baseball - ExclusiveCORRECTION: Within the article, Bart Hubbuch of the New York Post referenced ESPN's Buster Olney as someone that he believes links "properly." The article then went on to reference an article/video piece with Olney that has references to the Washington Post without linking back.

Olney contacted me to say that he only was involved in the video piece, and the cooresponding article is an ESPN news service piece, based largely on what Pedro Gomez reported and augmented by the info from the Washington Post.

The article has been corrected to reflect this.


If you follow sports on the web, you most likely read ESPN, or SI, or The New York Times. And just as likely as you are to read those traditional media outlets, you might be just as likely to make Baseball Think Factory, MLB Trade Rumors, or MetsBlog your daily stop.

 

Both types of sites are exceptionally popular.

Both, for the most part, are very different.

The new media sites mentioned have been called by some as "aggregators", sites that sweep the web, find the best stories for their given audience, and either copy and paste a paragraph or two of article with a link back, or describe the gist of the article in total and link back.

The value of these sites is that they make it easy to go to a single location and get information from a broad range of sites and then engage in commentary with others in a blog format.

For some that write for the larger traditional sites that get linked to – at least for some of the writers – aggregators are stealing content.

What is Fair Use?

At the heart of the debate is what is deemed as fair use of content. At its extreme, if you copy>paste an entire article in a blog, and don’t link back, it’s a clear sign of copyright infringement. But, from there, it becomes a case of interpretation.

For example, if an article is three paragraphs long, and a blog lifts two paragraphs, you can make a solid case that it does not fall within the “fair use” boundaries. But, what if the article is 5 or 6 paragraphs, the blogger lifts two paragraphs, and then writes a lengthy commentary around what was pulled and links back? What then? At that point, you have what has been considered traditional blogging since, well… blogging pretty much began.

But, there are a writers that see that method as over-stepping the boundaries. The argument goes, if the entire gist of the article is republished, why would anyone feel the need to actually click to the originating content?

This past Sunday, Ian Shapira of the Washington Post bemoaned the aggregating of content in an article entitled, The Death of Journalism (Gawker Edition). That caught the eye of Bart Hubbuch, the Mets beat writer of the New York Post, who said on Twitter that if you replaced “Gawker” with “metsblog.com” you’ll know exactly how Mets beat writers feel. As Hubbuch continued, “Beat writers object when aggregators cut and paste large sections and quotes from stories.”

Aggregators as Bloggers and Traditional Media Outlets

Hubbuch made a clear point that he views aggregators as different from bloggers, saying, “I have no objections whatsoever to bloggers who do their own work.”

The problem is, the lines can get particularly gray in this regard.

A good example is the SportsBusiness Daily, an extension of the SportsBusiness Journal, who is owned by American City Business Journals. The site is considered an electronic trade magazine, and is rarely, if ever, called a blog or aggregator. The SBD, is a subscription based site, that not only reports on news from other outlets, it provides an extensive amount of information researched and reported from the SportsBusiness Journal staff. They are considered the premiere sports business media outlet. As mentioned, they are a subscription based outlet. As an example, a single user, six month (26 weeks) rate is $700. (see an example of a page from the SportsBusiness Daily – PDF).

Yet, when I asked Hubbuch if he sees the SportsBusiness Daily as being guilty of aggregating content, he said, “Yes it is, in my opinion. Especially with how much the [SportsBusiness Journal] charges for that. I wonder how many publications are aware of SBD…” adding, “…and how freely they cut and paste. I see SBD, and there isn't even that many links in there.”

What About Referencing Without Linking In Mainstream Articles?

Pressed for what Hubbuch sees as the proper method for linking back to content, he cited Buster Olney’s blogging technique of a “one-sentence tease” with a link as being “spot on” – fair use.

However, a search of ESPN brought up this video/article on the Nationals and efforts to sign Stephen Strasburg.

Olney is only within the video, and did not contribute to the corresponding article. It is published as an ESPN News Service piece by Pedro Gomez. The total length of the article is six paragraphs tied to a video clip. Of the six paragraphs, three contain details with the reference, “according to the Washington Post.” There is no link to the Washington Post, simply the citation. Is this fair use? It is unknown whether ESPN has any agreements with the Washington Post, but if not, it points to another instance of how content is republished across media outlets.

That aside, referencing other news sources does occur in mainstream media, through lucrative content agreements. An example of this can be seen in this The Associated Press article from Monday in regards to The Boston Globe story on two security staffers with the Red Sox being fired after being linked to steroid use. The AP agreements allow not only licensed outlets to publish AP stories, but The AP has the right to reference the content of those that license content of The AP.

Fair Use Will Move Beyond Just Opinion

The issue of fair use of content is moving out of the sphere of personal opinion between those that provide original content, and those that aggregate that news. In June of 2008, a blogger was sued by The AP over six disputed blog entries, one of which had “18 words from the story and a 32-word quote by Hillary Clinton.”

The Associated Press Board of Directors voted this past March that “it would launch an industry initiative to protect news content from misappropriation online.”

In a statement at the time, AP Chairman Dean Singleton said the news cooperative would work with portals and other partners who properly license content – and would pursue legal and legislative actions against those who don‘t.
“We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories,“ Singleton said at the AP annual meeting, in San Diego. As part of the initiative, AP will develop a system to track content distributed online to determine if it is being legally used.

Standards For Fair Use Sets Up a Likely Court Challenge

While The AP seems to be drawing a clear line in the sand, other media outlets have yet to follow suit, although it may be simply a matter of time. Legal challenges seem a near certainty as the statements give way to practice.

As mentioned, one of the aggregators Hubbuch takes issue with is Matthew Cerrone’s MetsBlog.com, one of, if not the most popular Mets outlets on the web. As Cerrone was pulled into the Twitter conversation on fair use, he said in one Tweet, “WFAN just cited a newspaper report on air. I tried to click the link, but it was radio, so I guess I can't read the original report.”

While comedic, it begs the question: What news can be re-reported without crossing the “copyright infringement line?” It’s an extreme example but will Re-Tweets on Twitter become simply aggregating? If content is going to be policed, then there will need to be standards by which all will be held, a difficult legal matter that is bound to touch on copyright use.

Finally, One Might Consider the Following...

The newspaper industry has seen collapse after collapse due to waning revenues as news becomes readily available across multiple platforms. With newspaper website ad revenues becoming critical to their bottom line, playing hardball with aggregators could present a case of the aggregators finding less stringent sources to follow, which in turn lowers page views to stories once linked to, which, in turn lowers critical revenues, which, in the end, could lead to more layoffs and shutdowns in the print industry. While aggregating content may rub some writers raw, they are, in many ways, supplementing their paychecks. There needs to be a proper line between fair use, and cutting the flow of revenues off at the spigot by cutting aggregators off entirely. I'm reminded of the old saying... Don’t bite the hand that feeds.

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

If you follow sports on the web, you most likely read ESPN, or SI, or The New York Times. And just as likely as you read those traditional media outlets, you might be just as likely to make Baseball Think Factory, MLB Trade Rumors, or MetsBlog your daily stop.

Both types of sites are exceptionally. Both, for the most part, are very different.

The new media sites mentioned have been called by some as aggregators, sites that sweep the web, find the best stories for their given audience, and either copy and paste a paragraph or two of article with a link back, or describe the gist of the article in total and link back.

The value of these sites, is that they make it easy to go to a single location and get information from a broad range of sites and then engage in commentary with others in a blog format.

For some that write for the larger traditional sites that get linked to – at least for some of the writers – is that they view aggregators as stealing content.

What is Fair Use?

At the heart of the debate is what is deemed as fair use of content. At its extreme, if you copy>paste an entire article in a blog, and don’t link back, it’s a clear sign of copyright infringement. But, from there, it becomes a case of interpretation.

For example, if an article is three paragraphs long, and a blog lifts two paragraphs, you can make a solid case that it does not fall within the “fair use” boundaries. But, what if the article is 5 or 6 paragraphs, the blogger lifts two paragraphs, and then writes a lengthy commentary around what was pulled? What then? At that point, you have what has been considered traditional blogging since, well… blogging pretty much began.

But, there are a writers that see that method as over-stepping the boundaries. If the entire gist of the article is republished, why would anyone feel the need to actually click to the originating content?

This past Sunday, Ian Shapira of the Washington Post bemoaned the aggregating of content in an article entitled, The Death of Journalism (Gawker Edition). That caught the eye of Bart Hubbuch, the Mets beat writer of the New York Post, who said on Twitter that if you replaced “Gawker” with “metsblog.com” you’ll know exactly how Mets beat writers feel. As Hubbuch continued,Beat writers object when aggregators cut and paste large sections and quotes from stories.”

Aggregators as Bloggers and Traditional Media Outlets

Hubbuch made a clear point that he views aggregators as different from bloggers, saying, “I have no objections whatsoever to bloggers who do their own work.”

The problem is, the lines can get particularly gray in this regard.

A good example is the SportsBusiness Daily, an extension of the SportsBusiness Journal, who is owned by American City Business Journals. The site is considered an electronic trade magazine, and is rarely, if ever, called a blog or aggregator. The SBD, is a subscription based site. As an example, a single user, six month (26 weeks) rate is $700. (see an example of a page from the SportsBusiness Daily – PDF).

Yet, when I asked Hubbuch if he sees the SportsBusiness Daily as being guilty of aggregator of content, he said, “Yes it is, in my opinion. Especially with how much the [SportsBusiness Journal] charges for that. I wonder how many publications are aware of SBD…” adding, “…and how freely they cut and paste. I see SBD, and there isn't even that many links in there.”

What About Referencing Without Linking In Mainstream Articles?

Pressed for what Hubbuch sees as the proper method for linking back to content, he cited Buster Olney’s blogging technique of a “one-sentence tease” with a link as being “spot on.” – fair use.

However, a search of ESPN brought up this article by Olney on the Nationals and efforts to sign Stephen Strasburg.

The total length of the article is six paragraphs tied to a video clip. Of the six paragraphs, three contain details with the reference, “according to the Washington Post.” There is no link to the Washington Post, simply the citation. Is this fair use? Without placing words in Hubbuch’s mouth, the difference may be that Olney’s referencing of the Washington Post story is a rare exception, not the rule. Olney is considered one of the best in the baseball business for breaking news. He’s hardly an “aggregator”.

But, the point being made here is it’s difficult to say that it’s unacceptable for a new media outlet to aggregate news, when traditional news sources do it almost daily. A quick search finds that gold standard news organizations such as The Associated Press did so on Monday in regards to The Boston Globe story on two security staffers with the Red Sox being fired after being linked to steroid use.

Fair Use Will Move Beyond Just Opinion

The issue of fair use of content is moving out of the sphere of personal opinion between those that provide original content, and those that aggregate that news. In June of 2008, a blogger was sued by The AP over six disputed blog entries, one of which had “18 words from the story and a 32-word quote by Hillary Clinton.”

The Associated Press Board of Directors voted this past March that “it would launch an industry initiative to protect news content from misappropriation online.”

In a statement at the time, AP Chairman Dean Singleton said the news cooperative would work with portals and other partners who properly license content – and would pursue legal and legislative actions against those who don‘t.
“We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories,“ Singleton said at the AP annual meeting, in San Diego.
As part of the initiative, AP will develop a system to track content distributed online to determine if it is being legally used.

Standards For Fair Use Make a Likely Court Challenge

While The AP seems to be drawing a clear line in the sand, other media outlets have yet to follow suit, although it may be simply a matter of time. Legal challenges seem a near certainty.

As mentioned, one of the aggregators mentioned Hubbuch takes issue with is Matthew Cerrone’s MetsBlog.com, one of, if not the most popular Mets outlets on the web. As Cerrone was pulled into the Twitter conversation on fair use, he said in one Tweet, “WFAN just cited a newspaper report on air. I tried to click the link, but it was radio, so I guess I can't read the original report.”

While comedic, it begs the question: What news can be re-reported without crossing the “copyright infringement line?” It’s an extreme example but will Re-Tweets on Twitter become simply aggregating? If content is going to be policed, then there will need to be standards by which all will be held, a difficult legal matter that is bound to touch on copyright use.

Finally, One Might Consider the Following…

The newspaper industry has seen collapse after collapse due to waning revenues as news becomes readily available across multiple platforms. With newspaper website ad revenues becoming critical to their bottom line, playing hardball with aggregators could present a case of the aggregators finding less stringent sources to follow, which in turn lowers page views to stories once linked to, which, in turn lowers critical revenues, which, in the end, could lead to more layoffs and shutdowns in the print industry. While aggregating content may rub some writers raw, they are, in many ways, supplementing their paychecks. There needs to be a proper line between fair use, and cutting the flow of revenues off at the spigot. As they say, don’t bite the hand that feeds.


Maury BrownMaury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He is contributor to Baseball Prospectus, and is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow Maury Brown and the Business of Sports Network on Twitter Twitter

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?