normal dosage vardenafil stieva-a cream cialis online order lithium carbonate tablets wiki safe buy reglan online can you buy proventil canadian pharmacy order advair diskus buy alli diet pills online now curren ordering alli here in canada vpxl sublingual dosage sinemet reviews for men lamisil commercial youtube can sertraline cause high cholesterol can we trust kytril online purchase neurontin gabapentin purchase retino-a cream 0,025 american alligator facts sheet is it safe to buy from mobicity buy ampicillin perth australia brahmi limited india hoodia prices price increase lisinopril betnovate g price in india what is the lowest healthy percentage of body fat for a male fluoxetine reviews weight loss bismuth citrate side effects cialis 20 side effects canada drugs tetracycline with prescription generic tetracycline hcl cheap ciplox free delivery diflucan price walmart nolvadex generic for alphagan price actonel tablets 40mg luvox tablets 50mg free or low cost midamor fastest suhagra uk delivery online apotheke cialis kaufen glucophage without script to buy serevent generic periactin weight gain order crestor online no prescription with a visa what types of feldene are there sale antivert acticin tablets from buy plavix use in cats best price prilosec 42 count canada post shoppers drug mart hours kingston can i get high on vytorin cheap dostinex pills cost of skelaxin 800 mg over counter drug works like viagra order robaxin from relaxant bupron sr not generic canadian pharmacy online northwest cipro online company registration levothroid tablets for sale low cost overnight reglan nizoral 1 shampoo discontinued comprar famvir original citrato de sildenafila e' bom mesmo buy hydrea usa flomax mail order india dipyridamole mg no prescription vytorin medication generic brand viagra birth control online australia doxycycline acne treatment side effects metoclopramide not generic buy midamor inhaler canada generic ventolin syrup albendazole pharmacy order buy lithium online overnight viagra store in kolkata buy medicines online australia viagra shoppers alli slimming pill side effects where alligators live in florida finpecia drugstore.com diclofenac generic cheap costs what is ic promethazine 25 mg where can i get sinemet pills what is the order of reactivity of calcium lithium magnesium and sodium cost of cialis on nhs buy cheap kamagra oral jelly guaranteed china online pharmacy cheap nike air max 95 trainers how to buy alesse allegra d generic name tronchetti provera lista monti percocet equivalent in india doxycycline pills walgreens cymbalta prices generic salzarex vardenafil twitter search history brand allegra for sale brand levitra pill shortage prescription drug florinef zetia and eating grapefruit where to nitrofurantoin carafate suspension price buy lithium metal australia buy tinidazole canada how to import clomid cheap abilify online usa pharmacy what drug category is viagra professional online pharmacy no prescription needed cozaar order robaxin for dogs amazon boots promo code illegal drug identifier pill taking zoloft and cold medicine what type of medication is aldactone long term effects of prednisone psychosis very cheap fluoxetine do you need rx glyset acetazolamide diamox over the counter suprax medication for children where can i buy colospa in canada overnight us pharmacy buy aciclovir prescription overnight buy requip 40 citalopram where to buy in canada buy diabecon mg online where to buy depo-provera in the philippines dramamine online in us north american pharmacy formula generic for avapro 150 mg will reglan make you gain weight generic januvia cost order extendaquin online uk prices finasteride tablets usp 1mg generic eulexin us seroquel from uk zyrtec rx to otc shallaki generic wikipedia drugs lasix medication for horses amoxil tablets dogs to buy aristocort motilium pill canadian order promethazine overnight lopressor dosage tachycardia norvasc online in us vegetal vigra online no prescription uk for zanaflex altace online cheap buy kamagra gold new zealand online what is ciplox 500mg for price increase hyzaar side effects of valacyclovir hcl 1 online forum zyrtec no rx cardizem discount motrin shelf life testostorone cream free shipping men what is minomycin used for rosuvastatin suppositories buy buying malegra fxt from canada no prescription comprar elavil en argentina ditropan medicine information tricor by mail fastest reglan uk delivery does isoniazid cause weight gain rogaine 5 canadian pharmacy buy lotensin fast depakote deleviery what is amitriptyline for back pain better than zaditor diclofenaco sodico 50 mg laboratorio chile doryx reviews fucidin 20 mg /g kre'm methotrexate medication prometrium 100mg cost to buy naprosyn trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride tablets best price hyaluronic acid online pharmacy in india no prescription finpecia cipla birth control pills cytotec paypal and canadian pharmacy relafen 750 uses cleocin gel looking for generic yagara overnite shipping birth control pills torsemide medicines online purchase india acyclovir no prescription needed fluoxetine cost walmart orlistat generic xenical trimox over counter uk how much do lamisil tablets cost zyrtec dosage for kids doxycycl hyc 50 mg for acne diclofenac pill shop discount code florida atorlip-10 does lamisil make you gain weight ranitidine syrup india walmart alliance ne midamor 100 review paroxetine prescription assistance ptsd buy isoptin mg ortho tri-cyclen dosage betoptic phone orders no prescription clomid online what is diovan hct 160 levothyroxine side effects long term tadacip cost canadian side effects of prometrium suppositories during pregnancy quickest bystolic is it safe to take 30 mg of cialis alesse online meds overnight delivery order amaryl hydrochlorothiazide tablets dosage cipralex side effects nhs vente cialis montreal where to purchase avapro can buy domperidone buy alligator hairclips canada how much will haldol cost digoxin over counter medication augmentin 1000 mg pret azithromycin 250 mg z pack buy benemid australia pharmacies american fork ut is cephalexin available over the counter buy seroflo 100mg online metoclopramide new zealand buy cheap hoodia using pay pal indian zoloft levaquin mexico biaxin no prescription reviews amitriptyline without script lamictal to buy in australia kamagra com cape town buy amitriptyline online uk no prescription can you take combivent daily omnicef where to buy in canada stop spam emails canadian pharmacy can you buy sublingual in ireland online drug cialis overnight shipping dapoxetine ukmi prandin paypal what does cozaar treat buying drugs from canadian pharmacies tenormin without prescription miami how to use nolvadex for pct qsymia fda label lithium orotate how long does it take to work buy baby alligator gar ophthacare price generic uk paypal actoplus met mexican pharmacy no prescription detrol zoloft vs generic side effects advair us patent expiry long time side effects voveran aciclovir buy online uk xenical vendita in italia prednisone mg price nexium uk boots buy avalide purchase propranolol on line in india american ralista xbox live price increase 2012 how to buy acai berry buy moduretic online pharmacy cialis 100 mg 30 tablet en ucuz augmentin dosage for adults 875 what is metformin for fertility cleocin generic release date where to buy zoloft with visa can you get pregnant while on depo provera shot paroxetine pills buy long time side effects mircette best generic revia sites suprax australia keflex dosage cellulitis brafix cheap price topamax 40 mg dose where is motrin made switching from lexapro to zoloft pregnant glycomet without prescription cheap hydrochlorothiazide buy online cardura generico italiano can you get bactrim over counter compare prices trandate female cialis coupon code buying differin using paypal yasmin contraceptive pills price viagra coupon card 50 mg capsules amantadine hydrochloride current price cialis jelly how much is prometrium without insurance how expensive is clomid without insurance purchase ciprofloxacin hydrochloride buy prograf canada tamoxifen 20 mg pct top drugstore mascaras 2009 bayer 20 orange tenormin next day how to take acticin lipitor generic price canada albenza direct pharmacy acne after accutane treatment eulexin can you buy lopressor online generic can you buy pulmicort in ireland purim online bestellen cheap uk free shipping generic alesse order sinemet cheap clozaril cheap order cymbalta online no prescription best mentat prices buy cheap coversyl what is the standard dose for levitra alesse max dose where to buy rogaine 2 ointment can you get carafate over the counter etodolac 400 mg tablet abuse tadacip shortage 2012 aristocort results forum brand cialis tablets on line to buy buy cytotec singapore clomid success reviews diclofenac sodium non prescription buy menosan capsules cialis order in the us hydrochlorothiazide user reviews glucotrol xl generico italiano digoxin online canadian allopurinol prescription uric acid drugs tamoxifen purchase cheap nolvadex discount code for brand levitra how to get painkillers online no prescription online pharmacy no prescription needed estrace buy atorlip 10 discount buy zyvox online at canada pharmacy where to buy cytotec pills in the philippines diltiazem 100mg buy worldwide pharmacy serophene tenormin 25 mg dosage cipro tablets ciprofloxacin wellbutrin xl online canada cheap chloroquine tablets zovirax spain pills that get you high yahoo answers generic cymbalta usa pharmacy benemid pills sweat zentel side effects in children yagara reviews order deltasone cheap price cefixime generico italiano how to use ashwagandha for weight loss order kamagra gold pill compazine prescription coupon betoptic in the uk buy hong kong rhinocort without lamictal for men in usa buy flovent in canada how to use proventil hfa best price levitra 20mg buy tamoxifen 20 cialis sublingual online usa is finpecia available on line in canada snovitra super power 10 mg cost order cialis super active online no presctiption calcium carbonate tablets india much does propecia cost walmart canadian suprax tablet lamictal cost costco breast cancer tamoxifen best viagra pill como comprar paroxetine cost of allopurinol without insurance female viagra vice order acivir pills 10 pharmacy how to get estrace in australia hytrin looking for otc lansoprazole dose ordering brand cialis online licensed pharmacy brand viagra prescription drug orlistat western drug nymphomax buy retin a online no prescription genuine clonidine pharmacy cialis 5 mg precio en farmacia fluoxetine discount code buy cordarone 40 procardia drug classification us online pharmacy no prescription prednisolone amitriptyline generic mylan premarin over counter drug kroger pharmacy prices buy alesse birth control online combination buy minipress bulk dipyridamole pills where rumalaya forte cheap finasteride uk order lipitor from india without prescription how long to get synthroid out of system free canadian family tree search legal drugs online uk discount etodolac mg telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide tablets usp monograph buy perfume online international delivery canada pharmacy prescription drugs acheter paxil cardizem cd side effects weight gain fluoxetine on line levitra no prescription pharmacy cialis lexapro was working now not homeland season 1 buy rosuvastatin boots betapace pas cher italie what does maxalt do food asthma triggers where to buy viagra ointment purchase casodex my alli coupon code fml forte lawsuit i pill toprol xl website comprare viagra generico in farmacia cost of viagra prescription best price for fucidin prednisolone 5mg side effects in pregnancy different kinds asthma inhalers unisom shoppers drug mart buy vasodilan online usa what is clomid pills used for get actos las vegas buy himcolin boots etodolac 300 mg capsules urispas side effects long term use uroxatral dosage info diclofenac next day delivery phenergan from india biomox 100 mg buy lamictal 100 mg uk buy generic cialis europe what are good water pills to lose weight desyrel drugs discount haridra mg plavix manufacturer phone number viagra for women survey how many remeron does it take to overdose danazol prices hoodia discontinued is l-tryptophan legal in uk what does kamagra jelly do buspar and alcohol withdrawal splitting arimidex pills topamax barato antabuse online india keflex australia price vardenafil store order brand cialis online no prescription lipitor pills online in the usa over the counter pills to delay your period buy chloramphenicol overseas allopurinol medication class dilantin 100mg side effects how to use dulcolax bisacodyl como comprar livros no ipad can you buy propecia australia online cost buy cheap antibiotics pharmaceutical companies indianapolis indiana order doxazosin online no prescription with a amex phone in order for nootropil order birth control pills online uk buy vadik herbs brahmi oil effectiveness of birth control pills yasmin bystolic no prescription canadian terramycin tablet generic allopurinol 100mg lamictal dose for seizures can you order prednisolone deltasone doses cefixime buy on line propranolol refill pack ortho tri cyclen lo generic brands protonix prescription only celexa pills identifier purchase bactrim ds dutasteride 0.5 mg avodart gsk augmentin online cabgolin over the counter mebendazole side effects in children artane drug abuse tretinoin 0,025 from usa side effects taking viagra alcohol throat chlamydia symptoms in women levitra professional without prescriptions allegra over the counter when doxycycline no prescription buy most common side effects of levitra estrace order in the us buy etodolac 80 mg online crema elocom pret northwest pharmacy convention 2011 buy premarin singapore kamagra oral jelly 100mg wiki buy cheap estrace using pay pal lioresal 5 mg tablet best online pharmacy no prescription canada forum buy flonase online membership needed buy atarax us estrace uk buy tretinoin 0,025 max dose pills cheap dapoxetine online sildenafil propranolol and birth control pills astelin over the counter generic erythromycin ointment celexa 100mg cheap cialis pills for sale canada; lynoral usa cvs prices can you buy acivir pills free prescription viagra where to buy over the counter otc inhaler for asthma enalapril maleate mechanism of action alesse pill uk cardura coupon code ceftin discount dosage of bactrim for dogs what are the side effects of ashwagandha very cheap levitra super active walmart pharmacy jobs georgia flagyl side effects in cats order abortion pill online uk free coupon for kamagra genuine viagra plus best price luvox 50 mg tablets what does ginseng do to your body buy tetracycline 500mg prescription detrol rxlist buy alligator gar fish pharmacy eulexin tablets side effects law and order svu online live what is risperdal used to treat in children buy synthroid quick online albenza india lamisil spray boots fast proventil deleviery minocycline hcl 50mg capsules best generic elavil sites 1000 nice games 4 pink pills for chlamydia purchase generic nizagara buy bystolic bulk generic plendil uk paypal birth control pills forzest order erection packs 1 levitra prescription purchase brand viagra in mexico best psp 1000 games effects of nitrofurantoin in pregnancy methotrexate online order buy cheap online accutane without dizziness medication meclizine buy dostinex online pharmacy non prescription prilosec generic uk paypal hytrin how quickly viagra work long does half price cytoxan cadista methylprednisolone tablets 4 mg prescription celebrex dosage legal buy arimidex online canada can you only get nymphomax on prescription which is more effective lesofat or xenical symptoms of sertraline overdose valtrex buy online uk acheter cordarone pas cher nootropil no prrescription buy viagra plus discount qnexa online bestellen buy zovirax cream us is it safe to order metformin buy trandate fast shipping is it safe to order zaditor benefits of taking prometrium cialis jelly prices usa bupropion no prrescription how to get aristocort drug depakote medications
Home BoB Documents National Labor Relations Board vs. Major League Baseball, 880 F. Supp. 246 (1995)

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1035 guests online

Atom RSS

National Labor Relations Board vs. Major League Baseball, 880 F. Supp. 246 (1995) PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 39
PoorBest 
Selection of Docs
Written by Judge Sonia Sotomayor   
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 01:38

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

No. 1999 August Term, 1994

(Argued: May 11, 1995) Decided: September 29, 1995

Docket No. 95-6048

------------------------------------------

DANIEL SILVERMAN, Regional Director

for Region 2 of the National Labor

Relations Board, for and on behalf

of the National Labor Relations Board,

Petitioner-Appellee ,

v.

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYER RELATIONS

COMMITTEE, INC. and THE CONSTITUENT MEMBER

CLUBS OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL,

Respondents-Appellants .

------------------------------------------

B e f o r e: NEWMAN, Chief Judge , WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit

Judges .

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sonia Sotomayor, Judge ) enjoining appellants to restore the terms and conditions of employment provided under an expired collective bargaining agreement. We affirm.

DOUGLAS L. LESLIE, Charlottesville, Virginia (Lisa Klein Wager, Francis L. Casey, III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, New York, New York, of counsel), for Respondents-Appellants .

ELLEN A. FARRELL, Assistant General Counsel (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Mary Joyce Carlson, Assistant General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, Donald B. Zavelo, Ian M. Penny, of counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.), for Petitioner-Appellee .

GEORGE M. COHEN (Virginia A. Seitz, Bredhoff & Kaiser, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Amicus Curiae Major League Baseball Players Association .

WINTER, Circuit Judge :

This is an appeal by the Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc. ("PRC") and the constituent member clubs of Major League Baseball ("Clubs") from a temporary injunction issued by Judge Sotomayor pursuant to section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). The PRC is the collective bargaining representative for the twenty-eight Clubs. The Major League Baseball Players Association is a union that is the exclusive bargaining representative for the forty-man rosters of each major league club. The injunction is based on the district court's conclusion that appellants violated NLRA §§ 8(a)(1) and (5), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (5), by unilaterally implementing terms and conditions of employment that differed from those in the last collective agreement. It orders the PRC and the Clubs to: (i) abide by the terms of an expired collective agreement, (ii) rescind any actions taken that are inconsistent with that agreement and (iii) bargain in good faith with the Players Association. See Silverman v. Major League Baseball Player Relations Comm., Inc. , 880 F. Supp. 246, 261 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The injunction is to remain in effect until either (i) the expired agreement is replaced by a new collective bargaining agreement, (ii) the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") renders a final disposition of the matters pending before it in the related administrative case, or (iii) the district court finds, upon petition of either of the parties, that an impasse has occurred. See id. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On January 1, 1990, the most recent collective agreement ("Basic Agreement") between appellants and the Players Association became effective. It contained provisions implementing a combination of free agency and a reserve system -- that is, a compromise between free competitive bidding for a player's services and an individual club's exclusive rights to those services.

Free agency, in its purest form, is a status in which the rights to a player's athletic services are not owned by a club and may be shopped around by the player in a quest for the most attractive bid. However, for more than a century, Major League Baseball has had a reserve system that to one degree or another affords individual clubs exclusive property rights to the athletic services of certain players. Before the players were organized and a collective bargaining relationship was established, the standard players contract with a club reserved to the club exclusive rights to a player's services and provided for an annual right of renewal of the contract by the club in question. The Clubs interpreted the contract as allowing the club in question to renew all of an individual player's contract, including the right of renewal provision. So interpreted, this provision -- known generally as the "reserve clause" -- bound a player to one club in perpetuity until traded or released. After the Clubs recognized the Players Association and entered into a collective agreement with it, an arbitrator held in a grievance proceeding that the reserve clause allowed a renewal for only one year rather than a succession of years. See National & American League Professional Baseball Clubs v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n , 66 Lab. Arb. (BNA) 101 (1976) (Seitz, Arb.). Since then, appellants and the Players Association have struggled to accommodate their conflicting interests in the free agency and reserve issues, and a variety of compromises have from time to time been reached. However, relations have been acrimonious, and several strikes and lockouts have occurred. This appeal itself arises out of a strike that terminated the 1994 season before the playoffs and World Series.

Article XX of the Basic Agreement that became effective in 1990 contains a series of provisions that govern free agency and reserve rights. Players with six or more years of major league service are free agents and may seek competing bids in an effort to obtain the best contract, which may of course give exclusive rights to the club for a stipulated number of years. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 250. Free agency is guaranteed by an anti-collusion provision, Article XX(F), which prohibits the Clubs from acting in concert with each other with respect to the exercise of rights under Article XX. See id. Article XX(F) thus prevents the Clubs from agreeing either to refuse to bid for the services of free agents or to offer only low bids to them. Article XX(F) also prohibits players from acting in concert with regard to Article XX rights. See id.

Players with less than six years of service remain under reserve to their individual clubs, although a club may reserve a player only once. Although a minimum annual salary is provided, players with less than three years of major league service must negotiate with their clubs to determine their salary for the coming season. Article XX allows certain reserved players -- generally those with more than three but less than six years of service -- to demand salary arbitration. See id. at 251. Salary arbitration is a mechanism for determining the individual salaries for that group of reserved players if they cannot arrive at an agreement with their clubs. The player and the club each present the arbitrator with a suggested salary figure for a new one-year contract. The arbitrator then inserts either the player's or the club's figure into a blank uniform contract that the parties have already signed. See id. Article VI(F)(12) provides the following with regard to the criteria to be used, and the evidence to be heard, by the arbitrator:

(12) Criteria . (a) The Criteria will be the quality of the Player's contribution to his Club during the past season (including but not limited to his overall performance, special qualities of leadership and public appeal), the length and consistency of his career contribution, the record of the Player's past compensation, comparative baseball salaries . . . , the existence of any physical or mental defects on the part of the Player, and the recent performance record of the Club including but not limited to its League standing and attendance as an indication of public acceptance (subject to the exclusion stated in subparagraph(b)(i) below). Any evidence may be submitted which is relevant to the above criteria, and the arbitrator shall assign such weight to the evidence as shall to him appear appropriate under the circumstances. The arbitrator shall, except for a Player with five or more years of Major League service, give particular attention, for comparative salary purposes, to the contracts of Players with Major League service not exceeding one annual service group above the Player's annual service group. This shall not limit the ability of a Player or his representative, because of special accomplishment, to argue the equal relevance of salaries of Players without regard to service, and the arbitrator shall give whatever weight to such argument as he deems appropriate.

 

(b) Evidence of the following shall not be admissible:

(i) The financial position of the Player and the Club;

(ii) Press comments, testimonials or similar material bearing on the performance of either the Player or the Club, except that recognized annual Player awards for playing excellence shall not be excluded;

(iii) Offers made by either Player or Club prior to arbitration;

 

(iv) The cost to the parties of their representatives, attorneys, etc.;

 

(v) Salaries in other sports or occupations.

The Basic Agreement expired on December 31, 1993, pursuant to the PRC's notice of termination. Although negotiations for a successor agreement did not get underway until March 1994, the PRC and the Players Association continued to observe the terms of the expired Basic Agreement. Prior to the commencement of negotiations, the Clubs and the Players Association had completed individual salary arbitration hearings and had entered into individual player contracts for the 1994 baseball season, which began in April 1994. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 251.

Negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement continued unsuccessfully. The PRC offered its first formal economic proposal to the Players Association at a meeting on June 14, 1994. It included a "salary cap," a mechanism that establishes a ceiling on the total player salaries paid by each club. The ceiling may allow some flexibility, depending on the details. Generally, the aggregate salaries of each team are determined by an agreed upon formula and must remain above a minimum percentage of industry revenues, also determined by an agreed upon formula, but below a maximum percentage of those revenues. See Wood v. National Basketball Ass'n , 809 F.2d 954, 957 (2d Cir. 1987). The PRC proposal also eliminated the salary arbitration system and substituted restricted free agency rights for those reserved players previously eligible for salary arbitration. As an alternative to the PRC's proposed salary cap, the Players Association suggested a revenue sharing and luxury "tax" plan that would impose a tax on high-paying clubs. Subsequent proposals reflected disagreement over appropriate tax rates and payroll thresholds above which clubs would be subject to the tax. See Silverman , 880 F.2d at 251-52.

The players struck on August 12, and the 1994 baseball season never resumed. On December 22, 1994, the PRC declared an impasse in negotiations and stated that it intended unilaterally to impose a salary cap and to implement other changes in the terms and conditions of employment, including the elimination of salary arbitration. See Silverman , 880 F.2d at 252. The Players Association responded with a unilateral ban on players signing individual contracts with the Clubs.

Thereafter, cross-charges of unfair labor practices were filed with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") by the Players Association and the Clubs. The Players Association alleged that the Clubs had engaged in unfair labor practices by unilaterally implementing the salary cap and other terms because the parties were not at an impasse.

On February 3, 1995, counsel for the PRC notified the NLRB General Counsel that the PRC would revoke the implementation of unilateral changes and restore the status quo ante. The General Counsel indicated that the Players Association charges would be dismissed as a result. Counsel for the PRC informed the General Counsel, however, that the PRC did not believe itself obligated to maintain provisions of the Basic Agreement that involved non-mandatory subjects of bargaining. He mentioned salary arbitration in that regard and also suggested that the Clubs might decide to bargain exclusively through the PRC. The NLRB General Counsel declined to offer an advisory opinion on these matters.

Three days later, by memorandum dated February 6, counsel for the PRC notified the Clubs that, until a new collective bargaining agreement was ratified or until further notice, individual clubs had no authority to negotiate contracts with individual players because the PRC was now the Clubs' exclusive bargaining representative. This amounted to an agreement among the Clubs not to hire free agents and thus was a departure from the anti-collusion provision, Article XX(F) of the Basic Agreement. It also amounted to an elimination of salary arbitration, because salary arbitration is a method of arriving at a wage for an individual player contract with a club.

The Players Association thereupon filed a new unfair labor practice charge, and the General Counsel issued a complaint alleging, inter alia , that the Clubs and the PRC had violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the NLRA by unilaterally eliminating, before an impasse had been reached, competitive bidding for the services of free agents, the anti-collusion provision, and salary arbitration for certain reserved players. The NLRB found that these matters were related to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and were therefore mandatory subjects for collective bargaining. It then authorized its General Counsel to seek an injunction under NLRA §10(j). On March 27, the NLRB Regional Director filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction restraining the alleged unfair labor practices.

The district court agreed that the NLRB had reasonable cause to conclude that free agency and salary arbitration were mandatory subjects of bargaining and that the Clubs' unilateral actions constituted an unfair labor practice. The district court also concluded that injunctive relief was warranted. This appeal followed. We denied a stay on April 4.

DISCUSSION

The NLRB is authorized under Section 10(j) of the NLRA to petition for temporary injunctive relief from a district court to enjoin ongoing unfair labor practices. 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). If the court has reasonable cause to believe that an unfair labor practice has occurred and that injunctive relief would be just and proper, it should grant appropriate relief. Kaynard v. MMIC, Inc. , 734 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir. 1984). The court need not make a final determination that the conduct in question is an unfair labor practice. Kaynard v. Mego Corp. , 633 F.2d 1026, 1033 (2d Cir. 1980). It need find only reasonable cause to support such a conclusion. See id. ; MMIC , 734 F.2d at 953. Appropriate deference must be shown to the judgment of the NLRB, and a district court should decline to grant relief only if convinced that the NLRB's legal or factual theories are fatally flawed. See Mego , 633 F.2d at 1031, 1033; Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc. , 625 F.2d 1047, 1051 (2d Cir. 1980). In reviewing a district court's grant of injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j), a court of appeals must also accord deference to the district court's decision, at least with regard to those aspects that are traditionally left to the district court's discretion. Mego , 633 F.2d at 1030.

We turn now to the merits of the regional director's petition. The petition invokes basic principles of labor law. Section 8(d) of the NLRA mandates that employers and unions bargain in good faith over "wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment." 29 U.S.C. § 158(d). These are so-called mandatory subjects of bargaining. Under caselaw, the parties may propose and bargain over, but may not insist upon, permissive subjects of bargaining. NLRB v. Wooster Div. of Borg-Warner Corp. , 356 U.S. 342, 349 (1958). When a collective agreement expires, an employer may not alter terms and conditions of employment involving mandatory subjects until it has bargained to an impasse over new terms. NLRB v. Katz , 369 U.S. 736, 741-43 (1962). Thereafter, it may implement the new terms. Generally, when an agreement expires, an employer need not bargain to an impasse over terms and conditions involving permissive subjects but may alter them upon expiration. Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. , 404 U.S. 157, 187-88 (1971).

Many of the usual issues that arise in impasse cases are not disputed in the instant matter. The parties agree that the PRC, in directing the Clubs to decline to bargain individually with free agents, unilaterally departed from much of Article XX, which provides for a limited form of free agency and forbids collusive behavior by the Clubs in negotiating with free agents. It is also undisputed that the PRC unilaterally departed from the Basic Agreement's provisions with regard to salary arbitration. The PRC does not claim that it had bargained to an impasse over the free agency, the anti-collusion, or the salary arbitration provisions. Finally, it is also agreed that, if those provisions involved mandatory subjects of bargaining, their unilateral abrogation before impasse was a refusal to bargain in good faith. The PRC and the Clubs argue that the anti-collusion and free agency provisions of the Basic Agreement do not involve mandatory subjects of bargaining and are therefore not subject to the Katz rule that unilateral implementation of new terms is an unfair labor practice unless the employer has bargained to an impasse over these new terms. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 254. The PRC and the Clubs contend that an injunction compelling them to maintain the free agency and anti-collusion provisions undermines their right as a multiemployer group to bargain collectively through an exclusive representative. If so, they would be permissive subjects of bargaining. See Borg Warner , 356 U.S. at 349 . With regard to salary arbitration, the PRC and the Clubs argue that it is the equivalent of interest arbitration -- arbitration of the terms of a new collective agreement -- and thus not a mandatory subject of bargaining. See International Bhd. of Elec. Workers (Collier Elec. Co.) , 296 N.L.R.B. 1095, 1098 (1989).

We are unpersuaded that an injunction compelling the PRC and the Clubs to observe the anti-collusion and free agency provisions of the Basic Agreement infringes on their right as a multiemployer group to bargain through an exclusive representative. Free agency and the ban on collusion are one part of a complex method -- agreed upon in collective bargaining -- by which each major league player's salary is determined under the Basic Agreement. They are analogous to the use of seniority, hours of work, merit increases, or piece work to determine salaries in an industrial context. The PRC and the Clubs describe free agency and the ban on collusion as provisions undermining their right to select a joint bargaining representative because those provisions entail individual contracts with clubs. However, the argument ignores the fact that free agency is simply a collectively bargained method of determining individual salaries for one group of players. The anti-collusion provision is not designed to prevent the PRC from representing the Clubs. Rather, that provision guarantees that free agency will be a reality when permitted by the Basic Agreement. The injunction thus does not in any way prevent the PRC from bargaining as the Clubs' exclusive representative with the Players Association over the elimination of free agency in its entirety or for a modified version of the same, and thereafter from implementing any proposals incorporated into a collective bargaining agreement.

The question, therefore, is whether the free agency, anti-collusion, and reserve issues are -- or there is reasonable cause to believe they are -- otherwise mandatory subjects of bargaining. Section 8(d) of the NLRA defines the duty to bargain as "the obligation . . . to meet . . . and confer in good faith with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment . . . ." In Wood v. Nat'l Basketball Ass'n , 809 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1987), we noted that free agency and reserve issues are "at the center of collective bargaining in much of the professional sports industry," id. at 961, and that "it is precisely because of [free agency's] direct relationship to wages and conditions of employment that [it is] so controversial and so much the focus of bargaining in professional sports." Id. at 962.

Wood noted that collective bargaining between professional athletes and leagues raises "numerous problems with little or no precedent in standard industrial relations." Id. at 961. Such is the case with a free agency and reserve system. For the most part, unionized employees in the industrial sector may leave one employer for another without restriction. The employee may have no bargaining rights with regard to the terms of hire by the new employer, which may be set by a collective agreement, but is nevertheless generally free to go from one unionized job to another. [1]  

The professional sports industry has a very different history and very different economic imperatives. Most professional sports leagues have always had some form of what has become known as the reserve system. See Flood v. Kuhn , 407 U.S. 258, 259 n.1 (1972) (baseball); Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n , 556 F.2d 682, 686 n.6 (2d Cir. 1977) (basketball); Mackey v. National Football League , 543 F.2d 606, 610 (8th Cir. 1976) (football), cert. dismissed , 434 U.S. 801 (1977); McCourt v. California Sports, Inc. , 600 F.2d 1193, 1194 (6th Cir. 1979) (hockey). As noted, this is a system by which the right to a player's services becomes the property of a particular club with limited freedom for the player to seek employment with another club. The reserve system in one form or another has been used in major league baseball for over a century. Until the arbitration decision in 1976, the reserve system prevented players from offering their athletic services to competing teams. A player's services were thus the property of a single team until he was traded or released. In enforcing a complete reserve system, Major League Baseball was exercising monopsony power -- a buyer's monopoly.

However, there are many reasons, apart from maximizing the transfer of revenues from players to clubs, why reserve systems exist within professional sports. Fans might not be interested in games between teams that had entirely new lineups for every contest. Moreover, high quality play may require that individuals practice and play with the same teammates for at least some period of time. Teams may also want to recoup what they regard as training costs invested in players while they gained experience. In antitrust litigation, the leagues perennially argue that some form of reserve system is necessary for competitive balance. See Mackey , 543 F.2d at 611. Indeed, even in a system of complete free agency, one would expect to see many long-term agreements binding individual players to particular clubs.

There are also reasons, apart from maximizing the transfer of revenues to players, why a union of professional athletes would seek free agency. It is very difficult to set individual salaries in professional sports through collective bargaining. Although unions of professional athletes may bargain for uniform benefits and minimum salaries, they do not usually follow their industrial counterparts and seek relatively fixed salaries by job description, seniority, or other formulae. Players often play positions requiring very different skills. Moreover, the level of performance and value to a team in attracting fans differs radically among players, with star athletes or popular players being far more valuable than sub-par or nondescript players. Usually, therefore, players unions seek some form of free agency as a relatively simple method of setting individual salaries.

Most importantly, however, both the leagues and the players unions view free agency and reserve issues as questions of what share of revenues go to the clubs or to the players. The more restrictive the reserve system is, the greater the clubs' share. The greater the role of free agency, the greater the players' share.

To hold that there is no reasonable cause for the NLRB to conclude that free agency and reserve issues are mandatory subjects of bargaining would be virtually to ignore the history and economic imperatives of collective bargaining in professional sports. A mix of free agency and reserve clauses combined with other provisions is the universal method by which leagues and players unions set individual salaries in professional sports. Free agency for veteran players may thus be combined with a reserve system, as in baseball, or a rookie draft, as in basketball, see Wood , 809 F.2d at 957, for newer players. A salary cap may or may not be included. See id. To hold that any of these items, or others that make up the mix in a particular sport, is merely a permissive subject of bargaining would ignore the reality of collective bargaining in sports.

Indeed, free agency is in many ways nothing but the flip side of the reserve system. A full reserve system does not eliminate individual bargaining between teams and players. It simply limits that bargaining to one team. If free agency were a permissive subject of collective bargaining, then so would be the reserve system.

With regard to salary arbitration, we will assume, but not decide, that if it is a form of interest arbitration, it may be unilaterally eliminated. See George Koch & Sons, Inc. , 306 N.L.R.B. 834, 839 (1992) (interest arbitration permissive subject of bargaining). Interest arbitration is a method by which an employer and union reach new agreements by sending disputed issues to an arbitrator rather than settling them through collective bargaining and economic force. See New York Typographical Union No. 6 v. Printers League , 919 F.2d 3 n.2 (2d Cir. 1990). The salary arbitration provisions of the Basic Agreement are a method by which salaries for some players who are not eligible for free agency -- those with three to six years of major league service -- are set. The Basic Agreement sets forth criteria by which the arbitrator is to reach a decision. These criteria include the player's performance in the prior year, the length and consistency of career contribution, physical or mental defects, recent performance of the team on the field and at the gate, and salaries of certain comparable players. The Basic Agreement also forbids the arbitrator from considering certain facts that might otherwise be relevant. Finally, the Basic Agreement requires that the arbitrator pick either the club's suggested salary or the player's.

We decline to analogize Article VI(f) of the Basic Agreement to interest arbitration. Salary arbitration provides limited discretion to the arbitrator to set salaries for designated players who are not eligible for free agency. The discretion afforded the arbitrator is arguably less than the discretion afforded arbitrators in grievance arbitration involving disputes arising under an existing collective agreement, which is beyond question a mandatory subject of bargaining. In grievance arbitration, an arbitrator may permissibly imply a term even though the term has no explicit support in the text of the collective agreement. See United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. , 363 U.S. 574, 581-82 (1960) ("The labor arbitrator's source of law is not confined to the express provisions of the contract, as the industrial common law -- the practices of the industry and the shop -- is equally a part of the collective bargaining agreement although not expressed in it."); see also Holly Sugar Corp. v. Distillery, Rectifying, Wine & Allied Workers Int'l Union , 412 F.2d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 1969). Similarly, a term may be implied from past practices even though somewhat inconsistent with the agreement. See International Chem. Workers Union, Local No. 278 v. Imco Container Co. , 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2014 (S.D. Ind. 1971). We thus decline to analogize salary arbitration to interest arbitration, and, therefore, we hold that there is reasonable cause to believe that it is a mandatory subject of bargaining.

With regard to whether the granting of relief was "just and proper," 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), we review the district court's determination only for abuse of discretion. Mego , 633 F.2d at 1030; Palby Lingerie , 625 F.2d at 1051. We see no such abuse in the present matter. Given the short careers of professional athletes and the deterioration of physical abilities through aging, the irreparable harm requirement has been met. The unilateral elimination of free agency and salary arbitration followed by just three days a promise to restore the status quo. The PRC decided to settle the original unfair labor practice charges while embarking on a course of action based on a fallacious view of the duty to bargain. We see no reason to relieve it of the consequences of that course.

We therefore affirm.

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?