wellbutrin 150 mg nebenwirkungen prednisone teva 5 mg xenical dosage mg viagra 25 mg effetti viagra 200mg dose precio xenical 120 mg augmentin 1 mg compresse levitra 10 mg 12 stk costo viagra generico buy viagra online 35008 lisinopril 20 mg hydrochlorothiazide generic cialis 20mg cytotec 200mg misoprostol 1000 mg cytotec online cialis unbeatable viagra cheapest paypal cipro 500 mg ilac buying liquid viagra metformin generic drugs clomid 50mg steroids levitra 10mg gde medicamento zithromax 500 mg viagra buy orlando viagra information online doxycycline buy europe strattera mg 60 cialis reviews online lisinopril 10 mg tabs bactrim generic drug prednisone buying online order nolvadex online bula zovirax 200mg clomid 50 mg bfp generic cialis 80 mg valtrex cheap mexico clomid 50mg success 2012 generic 50 mg cialis cheapests priced cialis cialis 10 mg kosten diflucan 150 mg use dose 40 mg cialis metformin 1000 mg dosage 522 mg wellbutrin nexium 20 mg dejstvo celebrex 100 mg capsules cialis soft 60mg wellbutrin 500 mg 5mg lexapro tablets viagra stockholm buy diflucan 150 mg capsulas cheapist 30 brand cialis zovirax oral generic buy cheap viagra 100 online herbal viagra viagra plus generic cheap viagra miami augmentin dosage 1000 mg cialis professionnel 20 mg cheap 200 mg cialis order nexium india 50mg clomid men prijs cialis 5 mg will cialis generic cialis 5 mg dzialanie clomid pct mg cialis online italia buy cheap celebrex cialis online free clomid 100mg online interresults order viagra cheap cialis generic 1.00 metformin er 750 mg cialis 40mg tablets levitra 10 mg funciona zovirax 800 mg cost lisinopril dosage mg cialis d40 mg lisinopril 10 mg cost lexapro at 5mg compra cialis 5 mg 150 mg viagra dangers buy viagra bahrain synthroid 25 mg bula viagra 2 pills online propecia purchase generic erythromycin 500 mg dosierung levitra 20mg 50 tab max viagra 100mg glucophage 850 mg prix viagra 100mg usa lisinopril 3759 buy lexapro 20mg night valtrex online consultation cheapest cialis 40 mg kamagra buy usa metformin online sale doxycycline 200 mg online augmentin 600 mg packungsbeilage cialis 5mg buy propecia generic generic cialis ph manfaat xenical 120 mg diflucan capsules 50mg branded levitra 20 mg fake viagra 800mg buy cytotec uk generic zoloft greenstone lexapro 10mg receita uses celebrex 200 mg cheap zovirax ointment propecia generic wallmart doxycycline 20 online valtrex versus generic augmentin 825 mg dosage buy cipro hc viagra generico ultrafarma cialis 20mg slovenia generic levitra cheapest ordering generic levitra amoxil 400 mg bula order nexium uk lexapro generic online order deltasone prednisone generic cialis 20 online nolvadex 20 mg astrazeneca 1200 mg zithromax chlamydia wellbutrin generic coupon order cialis 5 mg posologia augmentin 875 mg propecia oral 5mg levitra schmelztabletten 5mg uk online viagra zovirax suspension 200mg buy viagra pifzer cialis 5mg us nexpro generic nexium synthroid 137 mg viagra tabletas 25 mg augmentin apteka online cialis generico 40 mg 40 mg prednisone daily propranolol sintaser 10 mg cialis 20mg billig propecia online belgium cialis e genericos cialis 20 mg foro lisinopril buy cheap generic viagra doses cheap cialis levitra 20 mg works priligy 30 mg compresse viagra buyers india xenical roche order medicamento generico xenical lexapro 10mg escitalopram cialis daily 2.5 mg zithromax 500mg tab synthroid generic mylan diflucan 150 mg 2x diflucan 200mg pret levitra pricing 20 mg priligy 60 mg filmtabletten canada celebrex online zithromax 500 mg alkohol doxycycline hcl 100 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mgs viagra cialis generico viagra 150mg buy viagra 25mg young cialis 5 mg ho lisinopril ratiopharm 20 mg lisinopril 20mg tab generic cialis exist cialis 5mg boner augmentin 325 mg bad generic wellbutrin lisinopril 2 5 mg efek cialis 80 mg zithromax 500 mg dosierung cheap lexapro 10 mg 45 mg buspar prednisone 1000mg day buy cheap metformin generic propecia erfahrung viagra pfizer 150mg strattera 25 mg cost dapoxetine tablets 30 mg lisinopril 0.25 mg zovirax tablets generic tetracycline 500 mg acne viagra 50 mg contraindicaciones cheap propecia 5 mg cialis 5mg rezeptfrei generic viagra boots online order propecia levitra 20mg information mg viagra propecia 1mg works augmentin 625 mg lupin lisinopril 40 mg cialis 2.5mg walgreens synthroid order canada generic levitra warnings lisinopril 5 mg w 928 nexium 20mg indication lexapro nausea 5mg metformin 500mg 3 times nolvadex 10 mg pregnancy discount 100mg viagra zovirax 800 mg dosis zithromax injection 500mg lisinopril 30 mg cost buy valtrex cvs clomid at 25 mg doxycycline buy overnight viagra generic 24 doxycycline purchase online diflucan 200 mg online prescription viagra 100mg xenical 500mg 125 mg. viagra glucophage metformin 500 mg 40 mg levitra online clomid 50mg ohss generic cialis milwaukee cialis 5 versus 20mg medicamento clomid 50mg lexapro online australia viagra 12.5mg experience doxycycline capsule 100mg viagra 100 mg dosage 400 mg of wellbutrin prednisone strength 20 mg cheapest viagra buy cheap viagra order generic strattera us 100 to 150 mg zoloft generico priligy portugal prednisone apotex 5 mg buy strattera cialis dosage 5mg wellbutrin panic disorder strattera becoming generic buy levitra cialis cheapest cialis 80 30 cialis 5mg europe generic viagra lexapro 20 mg efficacy viagra generico efectos xenical 120 mg kapsler buy nolvadex melbourne cheap propecia buy buy viagra bangkok 2013 canadian cheap levitra 40 zoloft dosage 100mg doxycycline doze 75mg nexium 20mg tablets difference viagra generic cialis 5 mg gabapentin viagra online jelly lexapro 20mg review viagra online 4rx assunzione cialis 10 mg augmentin 375 mg viagra 50mg kaufen lexapro 5mg ce cheap mexican cialis buy levitra women cialis generic cheap cialis posologia 20 mg amoxil 250 mg 5ml viagra bestellen 100mg wellbutrin generic companies levitra 20mg dose kamagra 100mg informatie strattera de 25 mg took 10 mg cialis nexium 10 mg preparacion metformin 500 mg po synthroid cytomel online levitra originale online wellbutrin 400 mg day prednisone 4 mg daily ordering cialis online kupovina xenical buy clomid montreal priligy buy usa cipro online sales augmentin tm 625 mg cialis generic timeline buy viagra sildenafil lasix 40 mg austria tadalafil generic viagra india cialis online generic cialis 200mg buy cialis discover cialis 40 mg ok levitra online cheap buy zithromax cheap dapoxetine hydrochloride 30 mg brand cialis 40 mg cialis 2 5 mg opinioni buy propecia turkey buy viagra edinburgh strattera 40 mg high synthroid generic alternative pauto cialis 20 mg glucophage 1000 mg tablets tetracycline 250 mg availability clomid 50mg usa synthroid 0.225 mg buy lisinopril 20mg mg doxycycline acne buy cialis brand lisinopril 40 mg buy 40 mg cialis usa remedio nexium generico ultrafarma viagra generico purchase clomid cheap buy viagra login anyone 40mg cialis get nexium online prednisone 5mg 6 taller bijsluiter diflucan 150 mg nexium generic costco generic cheap cialis levitra 20mg apotheke 100mg doxycycline dosage british levitra online viagra 100 mg beragena levitra 20 mg mg strattera lexapro over 20 mg cheap lexapro alternative order Cialis 10 cialis cheap canadian real generic cialis cytotec genericos valtrex 1000 mg cost buy alli orlistat order cialis sample propranolol 40 mg la generic synthroid ingredients kamagra 100 mg uputstvo zoloft generic version tetracycline 250mg capsules effets levitra 40 mg lexapro 2.5 mg tablet nolvadex 20mg bula anagen viagra generico generic cialis 10 mg. nogales buying viagra order celebrex uk cialis 5mg portugues cialis online acquisto 1mg propecia cost levitra generico farmacia viagra de 200 mg 50 mg of lexapro levitra 10 mg bucodispersable 50mg clomid cheap cialis soft 12.5 mg furosemide lasix clomid ml mg generic viagra st phenergan 50 mg im cialis 40 mg difference kamagra tablete 100 mg bangalore viagra online doxycycline 100mg kaufen 50 mg lexapro online levitra buy glucophage 850 mg anwendung purchase 5mg cialis cialis 30 mg erection online drugs cialis drug lisinopril 5mg order propecia online 503 metformin 1000 mg benefits erfahrungsberichte cialis 10 mg cipro online overnight generic propecia competition cialis 25mg purchasing viagra online propranolol 40 mg efectos generico para viagra test cialis 10mg levitra 20 mg reimport buy glucophage usa zovirax ointment order cialis online germany erythromycin ethylsuccinate 500 mg efeitos viagra 25mg erythromycin suspension 400 mg clomid online cheap comprimes cialis 5mg generic levitra 20 mg nome generico bactrim 1600 mg zoloft generic levitra images generic 10mg levitra iui clomid 25mg cialis 20 mg utilizzo kamagra online cheapest celebrex 200 mg pdf kamagra 100 mg prodaja celebrex 200mg srbija buy metformin india mail order kamagra doxycycline trihydrate 750 mg erythromycin order precio celebrex 200 mg lasix 40 mg pills pastillas metformin 500 mg levitra generico venezuela lasix 20 mg iw zovirax order augmentin 675 mg dosage levitra 20mg apteka buy 100mg clomid xenical 120 mg precio will valtrex generic celebrex 200 mg indicatii thuoc propranolol 40mg cialis 10 mg sulit strattera de 80 mg celebrex generic 200mg viagra online 25mg online levitra generic propecia dosage mg generic drugs cialis generic propecia august 2013 thuoc metformin 1000mg phenergan 50 mg pregnancy ordering nexium canada generici del cialis wellbutrin sr 200mg zithromax 2mg xenical online canada rischi cialis generico synthroid generic 2012 levitra generico orosolubile celebrex online canada securetabsonline cialis 20mg cytotec sale online lexapro generic wiki clomid generic 50mg viagra online 100mg clomid 50 mg ovulation cytotec tablets 200 mg propranolol 25 mg celebrex mims online foros viagra generico viagra generic au nolvadex 20 mg contraindicaciones generic toronto viagra valtrex cheap online amoxil bd 500mg cialis 8 mg cheap cheap cialis celebrex 200mg pfizer clomid 50mg tabs thuoc propecia 1mg levitra compresse 10 mg 20 mg cialis sufficient generico viagra online order viagra 150 mg buy lisinopril india buy cheap propecia viagra online amsterdam erythromycin 250 mg ulotka kamagra apteka online valtrex buy generic cialis france online xenical 120 mg wiki wellbutrin sr buy propecia 1mg canada doxycycline 100mg usage kamagra 100mg opis viagra 25 mg ausreichend viagra soho buy cialis 10 mg lilly clomid 50 mg success doxycycline cheapest 50 mg viagra cialis ontario viagra online india generic viagra singapore levitra buy buy doxycycline pattaya generic nexium 2013 cialis 40 and 100 mg lisinopril tab 20mg achat viagra 100mg indian generic cialis retirada genericos viagra prezzi levitra 5 mg commander cialis 10mg cialis instructions 20 mg buy viagra gels
Home Maury Brown By the Numbers: A Breakdown of the '08 Salary Arbitration

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1439 guests online

Atom RSS

By the Numbers: A Breakdown of the '08 Salary Arbitration PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Monday, 25 February 2008 22:00

A Biz of Baseball ExclusiveA Look Inside Salary Arbitration. Who Won. Who Lost. And, How Players Nearly Always Come Out Ahead

Most would say 1974 or 1975 was the most important for the players.

’74 represents the year that Jim “Catfish” Hunter was declared a free agent after Charlie Finley was found to be in breach of contract after not deferring part of Hunter’s salary and placing it in an annuity. The ensuing bidding war for Hunter showed just how much money owners were willing to throw at a free agent, if the shackles of the reserve system were thrown off.

’75 represents the year that Andy Messersmith and Dave McNally played their part in the historic Peter Seitz ruling in which the reserve clause was removed from baseball, and free agency became what is now, a permanent part of Major League Baseball.

Both are key points in history. Both are defined by Marvin Miller, Dick Moss and the Players’ Association. Both are watershed moments that redefined the rights of players, and by extension, the amount of money in salaries they would make. But, it is really 1973 that is Miller’s defining moment.

In 1973 salary arbitration was implemented in MLB, and since then has been a boon to the players, a thorn in the side of general managers, and a drain on owners’ wallets.

The system works thusly:

A player of over 2 years of service time (the CBA defines one full year as a total of 172 days of Major League credited service) can file for salary arbitration (see a listing of those that filed for salary arbitration this year), and at a given date on the calendar (this year it was January 18), if the parties have not yet reached a deal, the club and player exchange salary figures for what they wish to pay, or be paid, for the following year (see all the figures exchanged for 2008). If a deal is not reached by the club and player, then both sides present their case at a hearing before a panel of three arbitrators, which then rules whether the player figure or the club figure will be paid to the player over the next season. There is no in-between. It is either one, or the other.

Against that backdrop, more and more, deals are struck before hearings take place. In either case, the clubs almost always come out on the bad side of the deals.

Each year, I go through and examine all players that exchanged figures with the respective clubs and see who won, who lost, and when you think about it, who really lost while winning. Here are some details around the 2008 salary arbitration class:

Select Read More to see a Breakdown of this Year's Salary Arbitration Class

Salary Arbitration Details2008 Salary Arbitration Facts and Figures

Here’s some raw figures regarding the arbitration class of 2008. The figures are based on my analysis of the 48 players that exchanged figures with their clubs, with some additional data through The Associated Press.

(select the image to the left to see details for the 48 players that exchanged figures):

  • Increase in Salaries for the 110 players that Filed for Arbitration from Last Season: 120 percent.
  • Average Salary Increase for all 110 Players that Filed for Arbitration: An increase from $1.38 million to $3.04 million, was up from 106 percent last year and the highest since a 123 percent rise in 2005. The average rose from $3.01 million last year but was below the record $3.26 million set in 2004.
  • Multi-year Contracts for the 110 players that Filed for Arbitration: Sixteen players received multiyear contracts, two more than last year and the most since 17 in 2002.
  • Multi-year contracts for the 48 players the Exchanged Figures: Out of the sixteen total players that got multi-year contracts, ten of them were part of the pool that exchanged figures (Betancourt, Cano, Chavez, Cuddyer, Greene, Molina, Phillips, Rauch, Sanchez, Soriano)
  • Increase in salaries for the 48 players that filed for arbitration from last season: 220 percent.
  • Total salaries paid out to the 48 players that exchanged figures: $136,075,000
  • Average salary of the 48 players that exchanged figures for 2008: $2,834,896 , down from $2,853,214 last season.
  • Number of players that went hearing with their clubs: 8 (Clubs winning 6)
  • Historical Scorecard (From 1974, current to 2008): 485 hearings with owners winning 280 compared to players winning 205 case, or 57.73 percent of hearings in favor of owners.
  • Largest salary increases from last year (base salary):

Ryan Howard whose 2007 salary was $900,000, but sees it skyrocket to $10,000,000 by his winning salary arbitration hearing with the Phillies, an increase of 1,011 percent from last season. Howard is followed by Garrett Atkins (2007 salary: $400,000, 2008 salary $4,387,500, or an increase of 997 percent), and Brad Hawpe of the Rockies (2007 salary: $403,000, 2008 salary $3,925,000, or an increase of 874 percent) Chien-Ming Wang of the Yankees (2007 salary: $489,500, 2008 salary $4,000,000, or an increase of 717 percent by way of Yankees winning salary arbitration hearing), and Kevin Youkilis of the Red Sox (2007 salary: $424,500, 2008 salary $3,000,000, or an increase of 607 percent)

  • Largest increase of a multi-year deal based on average salary:

Brandon Phillips, whose salary went up 1,556 percent, from $407,500 to an average of $6.75 million under his $27 million, four-year contract. Followed by Robinson Cano, whose salary rose 1,428 percent, from $490,800 to an average of $7.5 million in his $30 million, four-year deal.

For the 48 players that exchanged figures, total amount of salary by position (base salary), along with player that had highest salary for that position:

  • SP (8 players): $26,780,000 (Highest: Erik Bedard at $7,000,000)
  • RP (19 players): $40,272,500 (Highest: Francisco Rodriguez at $10,000,000)
  • 1B (2 players): $13,000,000 (Highest: Ryan Howard at $10,000,000)
  • 2B (5 players): $13,500,000 (Highest: Robinson Cano at $3,000,000)
  • 3B (2 players): $10,487,500 (Highest: Casey Blake at $6,100,000)
  • C (2 players): $3,987,500 (Highest: Josh Bard at $2,237,500)
  • OF (6 players): $16,397,500 (Highest: Michael Cuddyer at $5,000,000)
  • SS (4 players): $11,850,000 (Highest: Felipe Lopez at $4,900,000)

For the 48 players that exchanged figures, total amount of salary by service time (base salary):

  • Under 3 years (6 players): $22,062,500 (Highest: Ryan Howard at $10,000,000)
  • 3-4 years (22 players): $37,815,000 (Highest: Garrett Atkins at $4,387,500)
  • 4-5 years (9 players): $31,322,500 (Highest: Erik Bedard at $7,000,000)
  • 5-6 years (9 players): $40,675,000 (Highest: Francisco Rodriguez at $10,000,000)
  • Above 6 years (1 player): $2,750,000 (Mark Loretta, 12.011 of service time)

The 48 players that exchanged figures, by club:

  • Atlanta (1): Soriano
  • Baltimore (1): Cabrera 
  • Boston (2): Snyder, Youkilis
  • Chicago Cubs (1): Wuertz
  • Cincinnati (2): Belisle, Phillips
  • Cleveland (2): Betancourt, Blake
  • Colorado (3): Atkins, Fuentes, Hawpe
  • Houston (4): Borkowski, Geary, Loretta, Valverde
  • Kansas City (3): German, Greinke, Teahen
  • Los Angeles Dodgers (2): Beimel, Proctor
  • Los Angeles Angels (1): Rodriguez
  • Milwaukee (2): Bush, Hardy
  • Minnesota (2): Cuddyer, Guerrier
  • New York Mets (5): Chavez, Church, Feliciano, Perez, Sosa
  • New York Yankees (3): Bruney, Cano, Wang
  • Oakland (1): Gaudin
  • Philadelphia (2): Bruntlett, Howard
  • Pittsburgh (1): Sanchez
  • San Diego (2): Bard, Greene
  • San Francisco (2): Chulk, Correia 
  • Seattle (1): Bedard
  • St. Louis (2): Molina, Wellemeyer
  • Toronto (1): Rios
  • Washington (2): Lopez, Rauch 

“What’s to like about it?”

To place the arbitration process in perspective, there is a reason that so few clubs and players go all the way to hearing. The stakes are too high. That and the clubs really lose even when they win. Whether a deal is struck before hearing, or if a club wins at hearing, the player nearly always gets a hefty raise.

Case in point, of the 48 players that exchanged figures, all of them but two sees raises this coming season when looking at just base salary. The exceptions are SS Mark Loretta, who lost his salary arbitration hearing with the Astros, and Alex Rios, who signed a one year deal with the Blue Jays. In Loretta’s case, there are no other figures that go with. He lost the case, and gets the salary. In Rios’ case, his base salary might be lower than he made last season, but he gets a $3.5 million signing bonus to go along with his salary of $1,335,000, and he would make an additional $15,000 if he is selected for the All-Star game. So, Rios is guaranteed $4,835,000 this year, an increase of $2,300,000 from last season.

So, it’s understandable that general managers aren’t exactly keen on the process. Asked to comment off the record, here’s what some had to say.

“It’s a way of life, but that doesn’t mean I have to like it,” said one “The player wins, even if we win. And even then, the process of hearings can build tension between us and the player.” Maybe, this reply said it all: “Honestly? What’s to like about it?”

So, is it any wonder that the parties work to get a deal done in advance of going to hearing? At least then they might be able to save a smidgen of the owner’s money.

The Mid-Point

Comparing the offer figure by the club and the requested figure by the player, we can derive the mid-point in-between what the club thinks the player is worth, and what the player and agent think he is worth. Of the 48 players that exchanged figures with their clubs, five of them reached base-salary deals for 2008 at this mid-point:

  • Garrett Atkins (Rockies): $4,387,500
  • Erik Bedard (Mariners after trade from Orioles): $7,000,000
  • Joe Beimel (Dodgers): $1,925,000
  • Kevin Correia (Giants): $1,075,000
  • Matt Guerrier (Twins): $950,000

As mentioned, the vast majority of players will receive a salary below the mid-point in-between the offered and requested salaries. Some, however, will receive salaries above the mid-point. Those seven players are:

  • Josh Bard (Padres): $2,237,500, or $62,500 (2.79 percent) above the mid-point ($2,175,000)  
  • Eric Bruntlett (Phillies): $800,000, or $125,000 (15.63 percent) above the mid-point ($675,000)
  • Geoff Geary (Astros): $1,125,000 or $25,000 (2.22 percent) above the mid-point ($1,100,000)
  • Khalil Green (Padres): $4,500,000 or $50,000 (1.11 percent) above the mid-point ($4,450,000)
  • Ryan Howard (Phillies): $10,000,000 or $1,500,000 (15 percent) above the mid-point ($8,500,000). Note: Howard won his salary arbitration hearing with the Phillies.
  • Oliver Perez (Mets): $6,500,000 or $887,500 (13.65 percent) above the mid-point ($5,612,500). Note: Perez won his salary arbitration hearing with the Mets.
  • Scott Proctor (Dodgers): $1,150,000 or $35,000 (3.04 percent) above the mid-point ($1,115,000).

The rest of the players that exchanged figures (35), reached deals that were below the mid-point, which explains why clubs work to reach the deals in advance of hearing, knowing that they could lose their case.

The following is a listing of players that had the largest decrease in salary when compared to the mid-point (base salary, no bonuses included):

  • Alex Rios (Blue Jays): $3,757,500 below the mid-point ($5,092,500) or -73.78 percent.
  • J.J. Hardy (Brewers): $1,075,000 below the mid-point ($2,725,000) or -39.45 percent.
  • Mark Loretta (Astros): $1,075,000 below the mid-point ($3,825,000) or -28.10 percent.
  • Yadier Molina (Cardinals): $550,000 below the mid-point ($2,300,000) or -23.91 percent.

Remember, Molina reached a 4-year deal that will see him earning an average salary of $3,625,000 over the life of his contract with the Cardinals, so the decline in salary this year will be made up in subsequent years ($3.25M in 2009, $4.24M in 2010, and $5.25M in 2010).

As for Loretta, his decrease is based in losing in salary arbitration.

What Can We Learn From the Hearings?

 This year will most likely be remembered for the Ryan Howard ruling. Howard beat the Phillies in arbitration, which was a feat unto itself. Consider, the following:

  • The Phillies had been 7-0 in salary arbitration up to the Howard case (Jerry Koosman, Alan Knicely, Kevin Gross, Dickie Thon, Dale Sveum, Willie Banks and Travis Lee). The last case the Phillies won was 2001 with Travis Lee.
  • Tal Smith, who has represented nearly every club in his long tenure as a representative for management, was representing the Phillies.
  • The gap between offering figure ($7,000,000) and requesting figure ($10,000,000) was the largest gap between the sides for the 2008 class that exchanged figures.
  • Howard’s requesting figure was the highest ever for a player with his level of service time, under 3 years (2.145).

With Howard’s win, he becomes the player with the highest winning award figure since Andruw Jones won his case with the Braves in 2001 ($8,200,000) and ties for the all-time award with Alfonso Soriano who lost his case with the Nationals in 2006 (he had requested $12,000,000). In winning, he sets the bar exceptionally high for young players (under 3 years of ST), or Super Twos.

Other factoids:

  • There were 8 hearings this year, with the owners winning 6-2. The last time there was that many players that went to hearing was 2001 when 14 players had their cases heard.
  • While Howard’s gap between offering and requesting figures seems high ($3 million), it isn’t the largest. The $4,475,000 gap between the Cubs offering figure ($11,025,000) and Carlos Zambrano requested figure ($15,500,000) last year is the largest gap ever. 

Conclusions

The owners have beaten the players in salary arbitration for 12 consecutive years, but players still enjoy incredible salary increases through the arbitration process. The last time the players won was in 1996 when Steve Avery (Braves), Jeff Fassero (Expos), Chuck Knoblauch (Twins), Mark Lewis (Tigers), Mike Stanton (Red Sox), Rick Wilkins (Astros), and Bernie Williams (Yankees) took 7 of the 10 cases heard. With Ryan Howard winning his hearing this year, he sets the table for other young players that enter salary arbitration, raising the bar exceptionally high.

Clubs are wrapping up players earlier and earlier, in many instances through the some of their free agency years. The best example of this was the unprecedented deal the Rockies gave to shortstop Troy Tulowitzki, a six-year, $31 million contract. It was the largest contract awarded to a player with under 2 years of service time (1.033). Dan O’Dowd and the Monforts clearly see the investment in the players that got them into the World Series last season as cornerstones to build off of. But, the question is, did his deal set a bad precedent? As one high-ranking executive said, “Tulowitzki appears to be special and his signing to a multi-year contract at this stage may very well work out to be of benefit to the Rockies.  But, frankly I would have waited. He wasn't even arbitration eligible until 2010.”

The landscape with free agency and arbitration has altered the face of Major League Baseball forever since they were instituted in the early ‘70s. But, as I have outlined, it is clearly salary arbitration that increases the size of the players’ wallets more than free agency. In that, salary arbitration should be seen as Marvin Miller’s pride and joy.

Select the image above to see details of the 48 players that exchanged figures with their clubs, agents (where they could be found) along with contract information. Please contact Maury Brown to fill in gaps in the agent register

Media and clubs can contact Maury Brown for an even further detailed accounting of these players, as well.

Sources: The Biz of Baseball's historical arbitration research, The AP, Jayson Stark


Maury Brown

Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He is also a contributor to Baseball Prospectus, and is available as a freelance writer.

Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?