kamagra soho buying zovirax 200mg price augmentin 625mg uk nolvadex buy online buy erythromycin lotion lexapro 10 mg abbott lexapro 30 mg dose cialis generic4all phenergan online chemist erfahrungsberichte levitra 10 mg buy n viagra 5mg cialis prices amoxil 500 mg tabletas buy nolvadex liquid cytotec tablets online generic zoloft 50 mg erythromycin ec 250mg nexium 10 mg brasil strattera 10 mg dosage levitra vardenafil generico zithromax 250mg fass nexium online buy buy levitra 10 mg erythromycin online uk cheap tadalafil cialis doxycycline al 100 mg 8000 mg viagra cialis generica contrareembolso nexium 20mg beipackzettel generic priligy safe clomid 100mg progesterone viagra comprar generico cheapest 150 viagra xenical 120mg costs augmentin 12h 200 mg order cialis 50 mg 5 mg. generic cialis nexium buy amoxil online buy cheapest levitra 10mg cheapviagrageneric viagra legit generic viagra farmaco diflucan 150 mg celebrex capsule 400 mg buy cialis venezuela mailorder 200 mg cialis cialis pills buyer generic lexapro kaiser order cialis online synthroid ou generico augmentin 375 mg filmtabletta cialis 5mg last generic zithromax walmart nexium order canada order viagra mail kamagra india buy kamagra 100mg dejstvo levitra 5 mg alcohol clomid 25 mg testosterone generic viagra 25 prednisone 40 mg tablets nexium generic 2012 metformin aurus 1000mg inderal propranolol 10 mg canada cialis 20 mg generic synthroid 2011 priligy 20 mg viagra generic buy augmentin online kopen Levitra 10 mg Buy generic viagra austrlia viagra online rush clomid twins 150mg online viagra lloyds augmentin 375mg tablets augmentin 250 mg thuoc augmentin 875 buy levitra 10mg effects 25 mg cialis reviews cialis paypal buy order lasix internet viagra canada orders prednisone 200 mg tablets propranolol 1mg riva metformin 500mg cialis generic same miglior viagra generico erythromycin online kaufen generic viagra instructions cialis 20 mg opinion cialis generico foro nexium 40 mg uses cialis original 5 mg cosco generic viagra lexapro dosage 10 mg lisinopril buy online augmentin 1000 mg nedir propranolol la 40mg prednisone 20mg acne levitra 20mg apoteka desi viagra 50 mg erfahrung cialis 5mg istanbulbuy viagra generic zoloft medication kamagra cheap india buy nexium astrazeneca cialis cheap 200 mg propranolol online pharmacy cialis drugs online levitra 10 mg nedir zovirax iv 250mg taking 25 mg clomid canadian 5 mg cialis 20mg paxil zoloft lexapro 10 mg image order celebrex canada nexium 40 mg sale xenical kaps 120 mg synthroid 75mg took 100mg viagra generic lexapro availability 100mg zoloft pregnancy trustable generic viagra online viagra liquid viagra generic capsule generic kamagra online zovirax 400 mg costo half 20mg levitra buy lasix cvs lexapro sleep disorder cheap dubai viagra clomid 200 mg generic lexapro better lisinopril hctz online pastillas viagra generico viagra online japan buy synthroid 200 mcg lisinopril 10 mg w 929 wirkstoff cialis 20mg viagra 50 mg 8x cialis 2.5mg cheaper acheter cialis 10mg diflucan mg dosage zoloft withdrawal 100mg buy amoxil 250 mg celebrex capsule 100 mg took 2 100mg viagra lisinopril cheap price valtrex 500 mg indicaciones viagra 100 mg directions ordering lexapro online cialis dosage 2.5 mg 5mg cialis online viagra online atlantic generic strattera generic valtrex walgreens cialis 5mg holland cheap cialis 80 mg lasix 20 mg tabs metformin abz 500 mg buy aventis clomid generic cialis online levitra order 100 pills super cialis online prednisone 5 mg kegunaannya propecia 1 mg cost lexapro 15mg garlic 1000 mg doxycycline buy viagra cipla viagra бrak 25 mg propecia online hong doxycycline online cheap generic viagra efficacy brazilian generic viagra 600 mg of zoloft cialis de 20 mgr doxycycline 75 mg capsules amoxil 250 mg bula cialis 10 mg experience levitra 20 mg viagra glucophage 1000 mg sr tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg priligy ftbl 60 mg kamagra 100mg cenik prijs viagra 25 mg viagra 50 mg use wellbutrin 300 mg er order viagra mumbai 5 mg lexapro usage vanzare cialis online buy strattera india generic zovirax india erythromycin bs 500 mg wellbutrin generic ingredients doxycycline 20mg generic cheap viagra pi viagra online bankeinzug metformin 3000 mg dose xenical oscar 120 mg nexium 10 mg administrare diflucan generic online propranolol bula 20mg valtrex de 500 mg lexapro generic wean 2013 cpt zithromax 250mg sandoz metformin 500 mg lexapro cost 20 mg augmentin gonorrhea 250mg buy clomid mexico cialis dosierung 20 mg doxycycline 100mg tekenbeet clomid 50mg prescription prednisone buy online buy viagra clenbuterol cialis 20mg preis to buy clomid 300 lasix 20 mg india tlilly cialis 100 mg viagra generico efeito wellbutrin sr100mg clomid 12.5mg synthroid 0.2 mg nexium 40 mg generic 2011 zithromax online ordering cipro online buying buy clomid nz generic lexapro discount augmentin 800 mg 0.25 mg propecia vs 0.5 600 mg lexapro generic lexapro fda propranolol 10mg cialis 40mg online viagra 100mg pfizer cialis 20mg bayer glucophage 500 mg viagra generico sms splitting 20mg cialis kamagra viagra cheap levitra two 10mg diflucan 200 mg day order 5 cialis 11 mg prednisone wellbutrin generic options cialis 5 mg priapism propranolol gador 10 mg celebrex 200 mg composicion buy zithromax thailand cialis singapore online viagra online buy pct clomid dosimg nexium 20 mg sobres when viagra generic generic cialis aanbiedingen cialis 5 mg rate order nolvadex 20mg cialis online help online propecia generic kamagra 50mg pills obat celebrex 100mg cipro 250 mg uti synthroid 50 mg price viagra buying canada wellbutrin 30 mg zovirax 400 mg dosis generic bactrim ingredients order Levitra 20 mg cialis generico uk amoxil 200 mg zoloft 100mg forum buy online valtrex harga levitra 5mg acquisto cialis generic 1000 mg viagra levitra generic review buy zithromax prescription metformin 500 mg order lisinopril 20 mg used generic viagra kaufen Levitra 20 mg Buy tapering prednisone 50 mg prednisone 5 mg uses levitra generic price xenical 180 mg relsuts acheter kamagra 100 mg lexapro generics australia medikament zoloft 50mg phenergan tabs 25mg generic viagra risks levitra online versand viagra mg chart liquid cialis cheap sildenafil 100 mg viagra cialis 5mg rezept propranolol 80 mg anxiety cialis 5 mgr belgie generic works levitra priligy cheap best generic priligy inderal propranolol 10mg viagra order pills zithromax 400 mg suspension cipro forms online strattera online kaufen buy cheapest propecia nexium cheaper generic viagra walgreens generic viagra details lisinopril tabletas 40 mg 100. mg kamagra online viagra online wa lasix 80 mg online buying propecia generic cialis affiliate finasteride generic propecia metformin 500 mg infertility cialis generic cheap buy doxycycline generique generic viagra cheap cialis 5 mg buy nexium cialis online 40mg celebrex cost 200mg 20 mg cialis first cheap lexapro india zithromax online us viagra buy bangalore buy generic nexium beograd cialis 10mg pret viagra 25 mg nexium 40mg argentina cialis 10mg dose propranolol mk 40 mg valtrex generic 500mg lasix online 90g bactrim mg info generic cialis discount propecia order finasteride 20 mg lexapro half order prednisone 100mg zoloft dosage levitra generika 10mg 1000 mg of valtrex cialis 5 mg uso purchase bactrim online wellbutrin xl 150 mgs cialis 20 mg danger 20 mg levitra viagra pfizer zithromax online amoxil capsulas 500 mg cialis dosage 60mg lexapro dosage 20 mg harga viagra 10mg cipro 200mg abra viagra online generic viagra bestellen generic viagra 4 hours viagra compresse 50 mg valtrex went generic buy viagra inatlanta viagra acquisto online buy xenical 84 capsules erythromycin 250 mg bp cialis pattaya buy zoloft tic disorders cialis 10 mgr jual nexium 20mg valtrex online cheap cipro 25 mg viagra online indian metformin hcl 5mg cipro 500 mg generic cialis generico e20 dosis diflucan 150 mg ordering propecia overseas order nolvadex cheap propranolol shanghai buy zithromax online bestellen buy viagra shops viagra buying limit cialis 80mg philippines venta genericos viagra lisinopril actavis 20mg really cheap cytotec buy viagra america augmentin 457 mg 5 ml 20 mg nolvadex ed 500 mg viagra lasix 50 mg dogs propecia coupon online lexapro 10mg buy lexapro 60 mg daily valtrex generic pregnancy propranolol movement disorders buy dapoxetine singapore levitra 4o mg propecia generic date 2012 viagra 800mg kullanimi venta viagra generica cheap viagra banglore cipro cheap online vanzari viagra 50mg viagra price 100 mg cialis 10 mg enough lasix 30 mg bijsluiter clomid 50 mg buy viagra 150 mg buy buy amoxil 250 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tabs zoloft tablets 50mg lexapro cost 20mg nexium cheap online prednisone 5 mg taper test cialis 20mg generic viagra wien xenical oral buy wellbutrin xr 300 mg levitra 20mg kosten kamagra online kopen taking 5mg cialis viagra 60 mg buy viagra korea durata viagra 100mg buspar overdose mg generic cipro 600mg zoloft generic drug nexium 40 mg polska farmaco generico cialis generic viagra miami lisinopril watson 10 mg generic valtrex pricing prednisone 80 mg daily 180 mg prednisone celebrex 200 mg buy cialis 50mg australia viagra generic love cialis generico canada generic valtrex 500 mg buying safe cialis review online viagra viagra kamagra online celebrex cheapest pfizer viagra 25mg glucophage tabletas 500 mg nexium 20mg na 300 mg zoloft glucophage taste disorder buy metformin uk augmentin 1000 mg duo ebay propecia generic cheap clomid 50 mg prednisone online 5 mlg synthroid generic ingredients cialis directions 20 mg online generic cialis cheap professional cialis cialis nederland online generic cialis brand cialis 20 mg cupon prednisone 25mg tablets lexapro 20 mg controlled black cialis 3000mg india viagra online viagra mexico generic viagra 100 mg 12 st metformin 500 mg tb24 buy 1g zithromax doxycycline 1 mg buy zeneca nolvadex medicinale levitra 10 mg cialis 100 mg forum wellbutrin 150 mg seizure generic viagra me generic viagra headache generic drugs lexapro levitra 20mg 12st harga lisinopril 5mg cheapest 150 mg viagra forum levitra 5 mg prednisone 0.5 mg tab synthroid 0.15 mg cialis dapoxetine buy blue viagra 3000mg valtrex 500 mg valor diflucan vendita online buy viagra arizona propecia online order metformin ct 1000mg cialis 40 mg cena starting wellbutrin 300 mg cialis 10 mg intervals xenical 120 mg aca buy clomid where amsterdam buy levitra cialis 20 mg prostatectomia buy cialis 40online 1 mg valtrex wellbutrin 450 mg bipolar buy nolvadex safely viagra mastercard generic
Home

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 458 guests online

Atom RSS

Earl Santee - Ballpark Development PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
The Biz of Baseball - Interviews
Written by Maury Brown   
Sunday, 09 April 2006 12:00
Earl SanteeIn this interview, Santee of HOK talks the Twins and Marlins continued efforts for new facilities, and how HOK approaches projects that are not yet funded, how the stadium design process is launched, which designs have been the most challenging, the downsizing of seat capacity in current designs, how upper deck design is approached in the context of lower bowl seating, Busch III, the New Nationals design, how Value Engineering is approached, what options by the client allow for a moving away from the nostalgic, or retro design, and how HOK can approach further work without resting on their laurels.
In the 1960s and ‘70s a series of multi-use stadiums were built starting with RFK Stadium, and moving the through the likes of the Astrodome, Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium, Busch Stadium II, and the Kingdome that has garnered a label within ballpark history as the Cookie-Cutter, or Cement Donut age of ballpark design.

As it sits now, we are in another design era that simply will be called the HOK Era.

Since the development of Oriole Park at Camden Yards in 1992, HOK has been the gold standard by which many clients looking for new facilities start, and nearly always end.

At the heart of many of these designs by HOK Sport, which is a division of Hellmuth, Obata and Kassabaum, is Earl Santee.

Santee has worked on more than 18 Major League Baseball parks and 40 minor league and spring training baseball projects, including the successful completions of PNC Park, Minute Maid Park and Angel Stadium of Anaheim. His responsibilities include design, project direction, interior architecture, cost estimating, feasibility studies and master planning.

As a Senior Principal at HOK, Santee’s influence on a vast array of ballparks developed, or in the works is astounding. A small sampling of his project experience includes:

  • Washington Nationals New Ballpark, Washington
  • New Busch Stadium, St. Louis, Missouri
  • PNC Park, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Anaheim, California
  • Minute Maid Park, Houston, Texas
  • Coors Field, Denver, Colorado
  • Wrigley Field Renovation, Chicago, Illinois
  • Portland MLB Site Analysis, Portland, Oregon
  • Northern Virginia MLB Site and Concept Design
  • Kauffman Stadium Improvements, Kansas City,
  • Busch Stadium Master Plan, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Minnesota Twins Site Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Shea Stadium Redevelopment Study, New York,
  • Florida Marlins New Ballpark, Miami, Florida
  • New Yankee Stadium, New York, New York
  • Las Vegas MLB Study, Las Vegas, Nevada

He recently received the top honor on Sports Business Journal’s list of Most Influential People in Sports Facility Design, Architecture and Development. He currently serves as principal in
charge of the New Yankees Stadium and the New Washington Nationals Ballpark designs.

Given the scope of Santee’s experience, it would have been impossible in one sitting to touch on every ballpark he has had a part in. Topics include the Twins and Marlins continued efforts, and how HOK approaches projects that are not yet funded, how the stadium design process is launched, which designs have been the most challenging, the downsizing of seat capacity in current designs, how upper deck design is approached in the context of lower bowl seating, Busch III, the New Nationals design, how Value Engineering is approached, what options by the client allow for a moving away from the nostalgic, or retro design, and how HOK can approach further work without resting on their laurels.

This extensive interview would have been far longer had Santee been able to talk in detail about both of the upcoming projects in New York in New Yankee Stadium, and the new Mets facility design.

Enjoy.Maury Brown


Selected Ballpark Design Renderings
Courtesy of HOK and the NY Mets

Click on images for Large view

Select links for hi-res versions

Nationals Renderings

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Hi-Res NE View (4.91 megs)

Click to see larger view

Hi-Res NW View (2.02 megs)

Click to see larger view

Hi-Res SE View (1.94 megs)

Click to see larger view

Hi-Res SW View (1.94 megs)

 

Marlins Renderings
Courtesy HOK

Click to see larger view

Hi-Res Aerial (4.87 megs)

Click to see larger view

Yankees Renderings
Coming Soon

Twins Renderings
Courtesy HOK

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

Click to see larger view

BizBall: Your bio mentions that you served as Principal on the first two major league ballpark design-build bridging projects: PNC Park and the New Busch Stadium. Can you explain what a design-build bridging project entails?

Santee: Design build bridging is where we are the design architect and we take the drawings to a certain point in the project. At that point, the contractor hires an architect directly to complete the work and the architect works for the contractor.

We stay with the owner and act as his advocate for design of the project. So the bridging aspect is that we "bridge" the design through the owner and not the contractor—the design build job basically.

In traditional design build jobs, the design architect is the architect of record. In design build bridging all of the cost overruns are born by the design builder, which would include design errors adnomissions and so on. In traditional building that’s not necessarily the case.

BizBall: How big of a role does consensus play in stadium designs that involve public/private partnerships?

Santee: Well, quite a bit.

Obviously, it depends on how strong the team is about their design objectives and then how those design objectives may marry with a community’s objectives for themselves, as far as future planning purposes or master planning purposes…if they want to build more than just one project, and what the influence of the project design might be on that (planning). So building consensus on design is important so everybody has a common direction and common goal, and at the end of the day they feel like there is a broad sense of success that is borne not just by one group.

BizBall: In many cases, you and HOK have been working on some designs that are, for lack of a better word, in limbo. The Twins design and site, along with the Marlins are two of these as the clubs continue to work on funding. How do you approach these projects, and, if you could, explain the adaptability part of that process.

Santee: Those projects are a lot like all of our projects. The most difficult part of any project is getting them funded. That’s as simple as it gets—some projects can be done in a year or two, like in Pittsburgh. Some projects take 15 or 16 years, like San Francisco.

So adapting is not a term I would use; I would probably say that we learn to be patient and let the process take on its own life and let it go its own course.

When the time comes you deal with all the changing environment conditions. Our job at that point— like with both the Twins and Marlins—is to create a sense of excitement and interest in the project that helps support the interest in that project from a funding standpoint and a public acceptance standpoint.

Once funding happens, in most cases, you get into a much more serious design process because you’ve got a schedule, you’ve got money that supports construction and building, and you’ve got risk…risk in the project both from a budget and time standpoint. A lot of it is just being patient and letting the process take its course. It’s different in every State but there is always a process and 9 times out of 10 it’s lengthy and not something that happens in a year or two.

BizBall: Given the number of ballpark projects you are working on, is there a method by which you can take a previous design and use that as a jumping off point, or do you approach each design from scratch?

Santee: They are from scratch. What we do historically is with what we callBaseball 101, because a lot of times when we start a project we have people that don’t understand the design elements and why things are done the way they are, and how those things relate to the building—from a design standpoint, from a functional standpoint, and so on. So we’ll do that at the beginning and then we do a thing which is really just interviewing all the stakeholders and try to get as much input about what they want in the building.

It’s a very traditional kind of architectural process where you’re finding out the needs of the users and you’re finding out facts about the site and about the city. From that you develop a process that creates the building. That kind of gives you the functional side of it (the process).

The form side of it is narrowly driven by, in many cases, one or two people on the owner’s side who have a strong opinion about the form. On the public sector side many, many people have opinions about the form. So you try to take all that into consideration with what the design of the project is moving toward.

In a lot of ways it’s like baking a cake in that you know how many ingredients are there but where and when you put them, and how big the cake is, and how you decorate, is really distinct to each process.

BizBall: Of the 18 MLB ballpark projects that you’ve worked on, which one was the most challenging?

Santee: I think the jobs we have now are the most challenging. The shift from a design perspective is, we’ve done some really great projects and people are happy with them, and now everybody wants to do something different or better.

Understanding that "different" or "better" sometimes makes things more complicated; may take longer or cost more, so this is the challenge within any design process.

The expectations are quite a bit higher now than they had been. They always were high, but now they are higher than they were. I think a lot of times people use the past projects as “okay I know you did this but can you do this?” and they’re changing the paradigm of what these projects are and can be.

They’re challenging…the New York jobs, the DC job, what we had to go through in St. Louis, these are very challenging projects. They challenge us from a design standpoint and they challenge us from a process of how we deal with all the complexities—how many people want to have input into the project. Who we try to satisfy; that’s another key point. Trying to determine who we need to satisfy in the process is very challenging.

BizBall: There seems to be more of a shift now towards revenue generating, such as total seat capacity coming down, there seems to be more emphasis being placed on other revenue streams, mostly in the form of suites. Is that a reasonable comment?

Santee: No. Since the early 1990s revenue was always a mainstay for the purpose of building a new building, along with the functional obsolescence of the buildings there were in. Nowadays suites have really come down.

What I will agree on though, is that looking at revenue in each market is distinct, and that drives the building design to be distinct.

It isn’t all about seats, it’s not all about suites.

In fact, I’d say if anything the baseball suite market has shrunk significantly over the last five years. I mean significantly. It is about providing distinct experiences for the premium seats just like you do with the everyday fan, and that makes the buildings different than what they were before. When we do suites now, there are not many of them and we do them in such a way that they have a position that causes the design to stay uniquely different. Like in Jacobs [Field], where you have three levels of suites along the third base line, but I don’t think you see the suite market driving the design of the projects anymore. In fact, it’s one of those ingredients but we’re definitely in a shrinking suite market and it has been for five years.

I think we’re at the smallest it’s been in a long time. The interesting part about that is that it gives us some more flexibility, because the numbers of suites in these buildings are not an enclosed building form like some football stadiums might be, so that we can put suites in different positions. We know how many suites we can put on one level and it allows us to make a much more intimate seating goal, and more interesting seating goal because we can split the decks up into four or five different organizations that make it interesting for that city or that team.

Revenues have always been there, and think that each team’s leadership really wants to add something to where they know their market really well and they want to work with us to design original and thoughtful forms for their markets. That’s good because it gives the community a much stronger connection to the building and hopefully that strong community connection means more revenue.

BizBall: On the proximity of (especially upper deck) seating to the field ... What's the acceptable distance compared to what it used to be, and where do you see those standards of acceptability going?

Santee: Well, we are designing much smaller upper decks like what you’ll see in St. Louis. There, you have only 9,500 seats in the upper deck, so I think what you’ll see in the future.

From a personal viewpoint, that is my preference: Build as many lower deck seats as I can.

Part of that is usually based on grade or access by the street. The experience of being in the lower deck is much different than being in the upper deck. I’m an advocate of large lower decks, starting with PNC Park and now St. Louis, which both have fairly significant lower deck capacity. So I’m an advocate of large lower decks and small upper decks, for a variety of reasons.

BizBall: Let’s go through a few of the ballparks that you have worked on…

Busch III has been interesting in that it has been developed in phases, and the footprint places it close to an Interstate freeway. How did you approach these aspects?

Santee: The phasing around Busch Stadium—I found out today (3/15/06) that they are finally laying sod. One of the ways to make phase one more function was to move the scoreboard so that it would not be impacted by the demolition of the old Busch Stadium.

I think it was more of a construction feat than a design feat. We put so much emphasis on stuff in the lower deck and things between the baselines, such as left field, which is where the old Busch sat wasn’t as critical for the construction process.

As far as the highway (I-64), we just had to be sensitive about it. We couldn’t push it any farther north because that’s where Busch Stadium was. It’s not unusual to have those kinds of constraints. They were difficult. The highway was something we had to think about from a noise standpoint. The architecture of that side of the building addressed the city and streets and so on, and I think we made reasonably good decisions about it.

We’ve got strong entry and seating points along first and third base and right field, and all of left field and center field are wide open to the city. Our design objective was to connect the building to the city itself and that was strongly related to how we positioned the building on that side, and coincidentally it was adjacent to the highway. But, at the same time it gave it the strongest connection to the city.

BizBall: In the case of some of the current designs you are working on, there is the use of a frieze. Can you go over how HOK decides whether or not to use one?

Santee: Some of our clients want to connect to the history and heritage of the franchise, and that may make for a fairly literal connection that manifests itself in some architecture.

Some of those issues are just logical design solutions to complete the design of the building. That’s one of the things that the Nationals project does, is that it allows a little more freedom for people to think in a broader sense about architecture as it relates to sports.

Historically that’s been (arena design) fairly modernistic in its approach. Football projects, while they started out to be more modernistic, have been both traditional styles and modern styles. Some are transitional, like the Chicago Bears stadium. That makes it interesting.

Baseball fields are baseball fields. It has the same physical dimensions. If you’re doing the job right you’re trying to get the fans to have the most intimate personal experience as you can. The shape of the stadium and its relationship to the field is something you can’t separate. Would we want to? I don’t know if anyone would want to.

I always remember that people said that Oriole Park and Jacobs Field look alike, and I said the only parts where they look alike is the grass field and that they share the same baseball configuration.

The architecture is that one is modern and one is a traditional building form.That’s always been a little bit of a challenge.

The same is true with football; because you’re designing to such a specific sport, and the sport has such a specific size that you try to make the best possible experience for the people who are going to use the building. You would think the seats would conform to the playing field. The only architecture is whatever else you put around the seats, whether it’s more development or inclusive development or exclusive development.

I think in 10 years you really will see a change in how buildings have provoke thought that is connecting the building to more than just the building form. I think you’re going to see more of the St. Louis Cardinals and PETCO analogy where people are trying to do more than just one building at a time, and try to create a district or neighborhood for the community. I think you’re going to see more of that in the future than you do now.

That’s part of the process with DC, is that they are trying to build community and the ballpark is one piece of it. So I think you’ll see more of that. Frankly it’s more fun for us. The more challenging the jobs are the more fun they are. I think that we’ve done quite a few, and having projects that challenge us is a good thing. It’s what motivates us to come to work everyday.

BizBall: On the Nationals design… The use of double decker suites has raised the overall height of the design. I have heard that the new facility will be 21 feet taller than RFK. Can you verify that, and how do you design a facility with this attribute to allow those in the upper deck the best visibility?

Santee: I’ve always stated this on DC, and it too has a large lower deck. Comparatively speaking it probably has half as many upper deck seats as RFK. So what that means is that this is where the whole evaluation analysis comes into play, which doesn’t actually work well, is that we could have added a lot more upper deck seats and gotten some seats a little bit closer. But, I think it’s better that you have a lot more lower deck seats and you have a lot more people closer. That’s really the shift and that is clearly a design shift.

I think they’ve got 23,000 or 24,000 seats in the lower deck, and let me tell you, that’s a great lower deck. If I didn’t do 23,000 or 24,000 seats down there and I put 3,000 or 4,000 more seats in the upper deck—and again this is where I think things are from a design point— I think lower deck seating is a much more valuable play for the fan.

I guess there are people who would rather sit in the upper deck seats than the lower deck seats, and I don’t know why, but I think we’ve had a preference in the last four or five years to create a stronger emphasis on the lower deck seating just because of its accessibility to the fan.

BizBall: There has been talk of trying to get the bouncing stands into the new stands that have become a signature at RFK. Is HOK working on this design aspect for the ballpark?

Santee: It’s been talked about. It’s still part of the design goal, and whether or not it gets executed is another question, but it’s still part of the design goal that was stated early on. That made RFK special to people and whether or not that will make its way to the new building, only time will tell.

BizBall: There has been a considerable amount of attention paid to the funding component of the new Nationals ballpark. The term Value Engineering has been repeated often. Is there a point when the overall aesthetic of the design could be impacted through value engineering, and how have you been so effective in addressing the value engineering component?

Santee: Historically, once we know how much money is being spent purely on construction and that’s been established, we really depend on the construction manager to identify what’s appropriate for that market. Whether that’s structural frame or concrete or steel or mechanical or electrical systems, we really try to work in with the construction manager to make better decisions.

That process went through a lot of VE (Value Engineering), but frankly, a lot of projects go through it because the construction market is as fluid from a pricing standpoint as anything I’ve seen in my career.

Because there is a lot of construction going on, you try to bid the work in a certain marketplace from a competition standpoint, so you get a lot of quality bidders. We just had a hurricane down south that had an impact in construction costs. We’re at kind of a dynamic time as far as how you look at cost. Fortunately for us, a lot of those issues are being dealt with early on. During the VE process you’re basically taking to subcontractors and saying “here’s what we’ve got so what do you think the number is going to be” so you’re actually getting early pricing from them that allows you to make a somewhat informed decision. It’s fairly fluid, so what happens is that after the early information you get some additional information and you have to make some modifications. Every job these days has a fairly extensive VE process.

BizBall: The Nationals design breaks with nostalgic design that has been a large part of ballpark designs by HOK in the recent past. Was there much discussion as to whether to go this route, or was there an effort to have the urban design fit in with some of the other architecture in the Near SE area that is being developed?

Santee: I think the design that was shown yesterday (3/14/06) was really a fairly common design objective that was shown by the city and the sports commission, as well as, the planning commission. It was a fairly common position for what the design should be, and our job was to organize it in a way that gives it a rationale for its purpose and what it looks like.

From what I’ve seen so far the press clippings have been fairly complimentary and people have commented that it took a break, but I’m not certain that if you look at that area there aren’t some changes within four or five or six blocks where there are buildings that have historical value. When you look at DC it has its own history. It’s not like we need to re-create it within a ballpark.

BizBall: Was the placement of the parking structures toward centerfield a design concern in terms of the viewing aesthetics looking out of the ballpark?

Santee: Yes. As architects we thought over everything with those kinds of details. It’s a concern about how big the buildings are and what’s the view to the Capitol—can people see into the ballpark from that side of the city—so those are always concerns.

How they are going to be developed is another question, and those are future questions that I don’t know if they have answers to right now.

BizBall: How important is site selection to the overall astetics of the stadium design? Did that have any impacts to the Nationals design given the unique process that MLB and the District were under?

Santee: The one thing that's different about the DC job is that in most cases is that historically we do the site selection.

Site selection is one of the most crucial aspects of whether or not you create a great building. I think the site we have in Pittsburgh is incredible and immaculate. In DC, that process was an independent process. We were given a program and given a budget and given a site, and asked to design a building and that's where we are today.

BizBall: What type of designs do you feel we’ll see in the next 10 years? Is there the capacity for a radical departure from what we are now seeing?

Santee: I think it depends on the client and the design climate.

Some clients like the Marlins, we had an even more modern looking building than DC and with a roof, and that was because the owner of the team wanted a piece of sculpture.

It just depends on the client and how they see the branding of their franchise and the community and how that’s represented. So I think you’ll see more projects like this one. We’ve embraced the Nationals job and that’s important to us because it does allow us to spread our wings a little bit. We can design modern buildings and we do it all the time. It just happens to be that we have quite a few buildings that have red brick or limestone or something that looks like it has a more traditional feel to it. We can design modern buildings, so I think the Nationals project is an important project for us. It just changes how people perceive how the success of a different design might have on their franchise within their community.

BizBall: Finally, given the number of ballpark designs that HOK has, done as well as those in process, is there ever a worry that HOK might rest on its laurels?

Santee: That’s one of my personality flaws I guess! I want them to be unique and distinctive. Absolutely. It’s part of how you start the process. You have to look at the city first and then you look at the client and then you look at the site possibilities, and all those things kind of drive it. The fresh side of it is that we challenge ourselves to do bigger and better things. Because we’re not a factory; we’re trying to keep this as creative as we can.

Fortunately for us we’re an international company so we go overseas and look at international buildings and study the architecture as an idea to create more interesting things for our clients. I think it’s just the way we’re organized. People call us a corporation but we’re just a group of individuals that love doing what we do and we don’t want to repeat something that we did before. We want every project to be new and fresh because that’s what motivates us to continue.

Let me close on this...one of the things we actually do is listen to peoples' feedback about our facilities. We read the press and we understand that we have a lot of design goals, and we're trying to do all we can do to make every building special to those communities.

In some cases we get opportunities like the Marlins job, which is a very interesting piece of sculpture, and a lot of that depends on how the client is. We have a great enthusiasm to try new and different things.

We have design studio that is full of young architects that we hire from all over the country to come work here and incubate ideas. I think that some of that manifests itself in our buildings as time goes on.


The following interview was originally published on the SABR Business of Baseball website, and can be read here: SABR Business of Baseball Interviews Page

Interview conducted by Maury Brown on 3/15/06
Transcribed by Galen Antle

Edited by Maury Brown
Graphics and layout by Maury Brown

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?